Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Guided learning

Adult obesity 2: treatment and management options for weight loss and maintenance

  • 2 Comments

Nurses need to know about the main management options for treating this increasingly common condition, and how best to help patients maintain weight loss

 

  

Author

Debbie Cook, BSc, Dip Nurse Practitioner, is clinical nurse manager, Rydal Practice, Woodford Green, Essex, and is a board member of the National Obesity Forum.

 

Abstract

Cook D (2009) Adult obesity 2: treatment and management options for weight loss and maintenance. Nursing Times; 105: 46, early online publication.

This second in a two-part unit discusses the various management options available to treat overweight and obesity. Part 1 examined the multifaceted causes of this condition, the rising prevalence, consequences and patient assessment.

This part outlines management options including dietary change, physical activity, pharmacotherapy and surgery. The issue of how to maintain weight once lost is also examined.

Keywords: Obesity, Intervention, Dietary change, Physical activity

  • This article has been double blind peer-reviewed

 

 

Learning objectives

1. Know how to discuss dietary changes with patients and the main components of effective weight-loss strategies.

2. Understand the indications and criteria for using medication and surgery.

 

 

Introduction

Overweight children become overweight adults (Bibbins-Domingo et al, 2007) and stopping this generational pattern is a major problem for the UK. Jeffery et al (2005) found that only a quarter of parents recognised overweight in their child and, even when obese, as many as 33% of mothers and 57% of fathers saw their child’s weight as “about right”.

Foresight (2007) reported that 10% of children were obese and a further 20-25% were overweight, and if current trends continue, 40% of Britons will be obese by 2025.   

Tackling this serious public health concern involves healthcare professionals at all levels in all settings. Croker (2007) argued that behavioural strategies help families make sustainable changes together. However, Milligan (2008) was unconvinced, and showed that even large-scale programmes such as family interventions and costly media campaigns have little evidence of effect in tackling either child or adult obesity.

The economic and psychological impact of obesity on society cannot be overestimated (Shan, 2008). Some healthcare professionals still fear they are being asked to treat what is fundamentally a societal problem, but losing weight is an individual responsibility (Pryke and Docherty, 2008). Most now agree that clinical and morbid obesity must be tackled, not least because of the enormous cost of over £1bn per year in the UK (Shan, 2008).

Weight-management strategies

Treating overweight and obesity is undertaken in a variety of settings. After initial assessment, healthcare professionals need to work with patients to try to understand the causes of their condition, teasing out their healthcare beliefs and understanding of their nutritional status.

Food is consumed not just for taste or nutritional value but also for its symbolic value (Helman, 2007). Often patients’ deep-rooted misunderstandings about meals and exercise need unravelling. Translating technically complex nutritional issues into an everyday, easy-to-understand language for patients is an important issue.

NICE (2006) recommended multicomponent interventions with structured programmes run by multiprofessional teams delivered in a variety of settings, aimed at reducing calorie load and increasing physical activity. Targets should be agreed, taking into account patients’ cultural and individual preferences and the general aim should be around a 600 kcal/day deficit, using the modified Harris-Benedict equation (Barnett et al, 2009). This formula applies an activity rating factor to the basic metabolic rate calculation to determine daily energy expenditure requirements.

NICE recommended that physical activity is important to everyone; it is particularly beneficial in those who are overweight or obese and have co-morbidities (Stear, 2004).

Evidence points to a structured approach as the most successful, with regular visits to healthcare professionals (Haslam et al, 2009; NICE, 2006; Avenell et al, 2004). This should follow a system which involves eating fewer energy-dense nutrients and raising exercise levels (see Box 1 on physical activity).

Therapies for managing patients include motivational interviewing, motivating change and goal setting (Turner, 2007). However, others disagree and feel that strategies should focus less on rigorous dietary regimens and attempt to tackle some of the underlying issues such as emotional overeating, which can actually be more successful (MacDonald, 2009). Patients are extremely different in their needs and levels of understanding and even healthcare professionals find it daunting to understand the difference between a low glycaemic index, low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet.

Showing compassion and understanding are key areas where nurses can help patients; understanding their own personal issues with body size and image can help nurses support patients in the psychologically and emotionally complex task of tackling eating behaviours (MacDonald, 2009).

A one-size-fits-all conventional approach can end up being less than successful and alternative therapies such as neurolinguistic programming or behaviour therapy can have better results (Avenell et al, 2004). Pryke and Docherty (2008) went even further and advocated the need to look at “weight constancy” as an outcome measure, rather than the harder to achieve usual target of losing 5% of initial body weight.

NICE (2006) recommended using diet and exercise interventions first-line as part of a multicomponent regimen. Diets should be nutritionally sound and not unnecessarily restrictive. Very low calorie diets are recommended only for obese people who have reached a plateau and should be carefully supervised and medically managed.

When adults do not reach their target weight loss or have reached a plateau on dietary, activity and behavioural change alone, pharmacotherapy may be included in the strategy (NICE, 2006).

 

Box 1. Physical activity

  • Physical activity is a major part of all obesity strategies.
  • There is well documented evidence for including physical activity programmes in weight-management programmes (Barnett et al, 2009; NICE, 2006).
  • To lose weight or maintain weight lost, people should exercise for 60-90 minutes on at least five days per week.
  • However, over 60% of the world’s population are not active enough. The benefits of physical activity have not yet been fully appreciated (Stear, 2004).

Pharmacotherapy

There are currently only two types of prescription medication for treating overweight and obesity, which should be used to reduce health risks in obese patients (Royal College of Physicians, 2003). The use of these drugs is governed by NICE (2006) guidance; they should not be used in combination, and the choice of drug should be carefully negotiated between patient and prescriber.

NICE (2006) guidance states that both orlistat and sibutramine should be prescribed only as part of an overall plan for managing obesity in adults who meet certain criteria (see below).

Orlistat 120mg given three times a day with food is a lipase inhibitor, not systemically absorbed, which inhibits pancreatic and gastric lipases. The drug has a mild appetite suppressant effect and fat excretion is increased (Shan, 2008). It is recommended for use in those with a BMI of 30kg/m or more, or 28kg/m or more with associated risk factors (NICE, 2006).

Side effects include liquid or oily stools and faecal incontinence (British National Formulary, 2009), but this can be minimised by strict adherence to the low-fat diet recommended for use with it. It can be continued for over 12 months if deemed appropriate (Barnett et al, 2009; NICE, 2006).

Sibutramine, a centrally-acting reuptake inhibitor of noradrenaline, increases a feeling of fulness. This drug has a more powerful systemic effect than orlistat and can result in weight loss by reducing food cravings, although it should not be used for more than a year (NICE, 2006).

It is recommended for use in those with a BMI of 30kg/m or more, or 27kg/m or more and other obesity-related risk factors such as type 2 diabetes or dyslipidaemia. Side effects include constipation, insomnia, nausea and palpitations (BNF, 2009).

NICE (2006) recommended that both drugs should only be continued for more than three months if patients have lost at least 5% of their initial body weight since starting drug treatment.

A new innovation - approved by the government in a bid to involve pharmacies in supporting patients to self care - is the introduction of alli. This is a low-dose formulation of orlistat that is available as a pharmacy-only drug and does not require a prescription (Finer, 2009). The drug is suitable for people over 18 with a BMI of 28 or more who commit to a healthy lifestyle (reduced calorie, lower-fat diet and increased physical activity) (GlaxoSmithKline, 2009). 

However, the cost of this drug may be counter-productive in reducing obesity/overweight as those from lower-income groups may not be able to afford it.

Surgery

For some, the options of dieting, physical activity and/or pharmacotherapy are not sufficient and NICE (2006) recommended bariatric surgery for certain patients if these have been tried unsuccessfully. There are several types of surgery, including gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion (BDP) and duodenal switch. Weight reduction is likely to be greatest after BDP but the Roux-en-Y bypass can result in weight losses of as much as 80% of original body weight by four years post operatively (Haslam et al, 2009).

Criteria for bariatric surgery

NICE (2006) developed strict criteria for bariatric surgery. It is recommended as a treatment option for people with obesity if all of the following are met:

  • Patients have a BMI of 40kg/m or more, or 35-40kg/m and other significant disease, such as type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure;
  • They have tried all appropriate non-surgical measures for at least six months before but have failed to achieve or maintain adequate weight loss;
  • They have been receiving or will receive intensive management in a specialist obesity service;
  • Patients are fit for anaesthesia and surgery;
  • They commit to the need for long-term follow up.

Patients with a BMI of >50kg/m should be offered bariatric surgery as a first-line intervention if they are fit for surgery (NICE, 2006).

What is not always clear to both patients and healthcare professionals is the need for long-term follow up, including regular reviews and reappraisals as patients continue on their weight-loss journey (Haslam et al, 2009).

Weight maintenance

As with all modalities for losing weight, maintenance is a key issue. Engaging patients to keep trying to maintain a healthy lifestyle even when results are poor can be extremely de-motivating.

After six months of weight loss, programmes to encourage weight maintenance and prevent regain should be put in place, and the combination of continued behaviour therapy, dietary therapy and physical activity is deemed to be the most successful (Barnett et al, 2009).

Weight-loss drugs tend to be effective during the course of treatment but weight gain may occur when the course is completed unless patients are motivated to use non-pharmacological methods. Even though surgical options can lead to dramatic weight loss, unless a weight maintenance programme is put in place, the tendency is for much if not all of the weight to be regained.

Pryke and Docherty (2008) advocated focusing more on weight constancy than on weight loss as a measure of success.

The Counterweight Project Team (2008) showed that all interventions plateau and weight regain is often no more than the normal 1-2kg/year that the general population put on. This suggests that while patients do reach a plateau on weight-loss programmes, they are nonetheless worthwhile to reduce the risks associated with obesity.

Conclusion

The obesity epidemic affects us all and nurses will increasingly interact with patients with varying levels of overweight and obesity. Encouraging patients to become aware of their risk status and to engage with activities and programmes to reduce their risk of significant disease associated with obesity is the duty of all healthcare professionals.

 

Online CPD

For the Portfolio Pages corresponding to this unit see the document above.

Portfolio Pages contain activities that correspond to the learning objectives in the unit. They are presented in a convenient format for you to print out or work through on screen and can be filed in your professional portfolio as evidence of your learning and professional development.

Click here for more Guided learning units

 

 

 

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • Ian McAllister

    Structured patient education plays a vital role in helping people who are overweight or obese, to understand the importance of achieving and maintaining a healthy weight range.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • hello, i have used this website in my coursework and i put:"Barnett A et al (2009) Managing adult obesity in primary care - a consensus algorithm (roundtable discussion). Supplement to Diabetes andPrimary Care; 11: 1, 53-62." as a reference but in my refernce list i need to put the whole names of the writers and i couldn't find it so please i would like some help thank you ASAP

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.