Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC backs revalidation plans despite concerns


The Nursing and Midwifery Council has approved plans for the revalidation of the profession - provided the new system can be shown to be worth the cost.

Council members were given the opportunity to debate three options for the introduction of revalidation by 2015 at their meeting yesterday morning. However, they were unanimous in backing the third option.

This will see increased audit of post registration education and practice portfolios and require registrants to collect feedback from patients and colleagues every three years. The nurse or midwife must then declare they have had had an appraisal and are fit to practise.

Lay member Louise Scull, who is also vice chair of Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, warned any system would need to be worth the cost to the wider health and social care system. She said if this could not be proven she would prefer the second option, which involves only increased audit.

Both options have the same £4.5m start up costs and £1m annual running costs. However, the second option would not require any extra investment from employers or registrants in collecting feedback or conducting appraisals.

Other council members also raised concerns. Stephen Thornton called for the NMC to invest in a “completely independent evaluation” to look at whether revalidation had “any impact on patient safety”.

Judith Ellis told council there was concern among nurses working in academia about what revalidation would mean for them and called for all registrants to be subject to the same system of revalidation.

She also raised concerns about relying on employers to conduct good quality appraisals. The NHS staff survey for 2012 found that, although nationally 83% of staff reported having an appraisal, only 37% said they were well structured.

Professor Ellis said: “We know that the value of appraisal varies dramatically across the health service… if we are developing a system that’s reliant on other peoples’ processes, that is a concern.”

NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith acknowledged that appraisal was “variable and patchy”, but said that was “not a reason” for not introducing the proposed model of revalidation. She said revalidation could help drive up the quality of appraisal.

Speaking to Nursing Times after the meeting, NMC chair Mark Addison denied that a requirement for a nurse or midwife to sign a declaration saying they had undergone an appraisal in the last year risked becoming a “tick box exercise”.

“There are tick boxes that are lies where you haven’t had an appraisal, in which case the audit system would kick in. A tick box where a registrant will be required to say they have had an appraisal will encourage trusts and registrants to take it seriously,” he said.

The NMC will consult on the proposals until next summer and plans to begin piloting the model in early 2015.


Readers' comments (17)

  • Just a few points: how will those nurses who don't have direct patient contact or whose patients are unconscious e.g. NHS Direct, theatres and ICU get positive feedback to enable them to re-register?

    What about those who work with patients who do not have capacity e.g. Mental Health or LD nurses?

    What about nurses who work in prisons where the 'clientele' are unlikely to cooperate?

    As per usual, the NMC is run by a shower who have never been near a patient in years, they've not got a clue.

    If these plans do go ahead, I think the NHS are going to have a huge number of nurses who, due to either not having an appraisal or not being able to supply the necessary 'evidence' being unable to re-register.

    What a pantomime!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NMC:

    Nursing & Midwifery Circus

    Run by clowns

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • as it's the members who fund the NMC then we should be the ones who decide what is best.
    who is going to decide which patient will give feedback - how will this be monitored for fairness, how many patients will be asked per nurse.
    how much more will the NMC charge per registrant to put this idea into place?
    why does it need changing, what is wrong with their old system - if it failed, why did it fail and what exactly have we been paying them for?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can the unions not ballot members as to whether they have any confidence in the NMC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 13-Sep-2013 11:15 am

    Just a few points: how will those nurses who don't have direct patient contact or whose patients are unconscious e.g. NHS Direct, theatres and ICU get positive feedback to enable them to re-register?

    Good point, those unconscious patients ringing NHS Direct will be difficult to track down :)

    Linking appraisal to revalidation is not something to give up lightly. Appraisal is each registrants opportunity to sort out their development and get their concerns aired. This should be a requirement of revalidation - as it is for doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nick Addison's quote on tick boxes makes no sense. How will the NMC know which nurses ticking boxes are telling lies?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think I read on this forum (or somewhere similar) that teachers used to be regulated by an out-of-touch body like the NMC, but they managed to get rid of it. Any help on how they managed to achieve this would be greatly appreciated.

    I'm not against staff appraisals being used to revalidate someones fitness to practice, but I think this nonsense about having to get statements from patients is meaningless.

    I work for an absolutely repulsive individual who intimidates and bullies her staff and I worry - not only for myself - but for those in a similar position to me, that 'revalidation' would be yet another stick in which to threaten staff.

    Nursing being the nasty, bitchy profession that it is makes me extremely uneasy about my manager having the power to put in jeopardy my whole livelihood. Safeguards will need to be in place.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How often do the powers that be at the NMC have to revalidate ? Who do they get appraisals from? Do we even know who these faceless individuals are?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 13-Sep-2013 6:32 pm

    I think one of them might be Joe 90.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The disadvantage of directly linking employment appraisal and revalidation is that this increases the likelihood of a culture of secrecy and bad practice becoming endemic. How will the whistleblower raise concerns when they know that not only their job, but also their career is dependent on their boss's appraisal of them.
    Nursing has always had a back stabbing culture that generally has prevented bad practice persisting, however reduction in post numbers has meant that good care is almost impossible for staff to achieve best practice, even when working hours of unpaid overtime a week (which many nurses do).
    Because of the autonomous nature of their work and the culture for doctors generally, revalidation is little more than a rubber stamping operation where they have a budget for their development. How many consultants and registrars have continued to practice despite being bullies towards their staff or portraying completely unacceptable behaviour.
    Whilst the practicalities demand that non-registrants can appraise registrants for revalidation, how does a non-professional evaluate the expected and good practice behaviours of a professional. Nurses raising concerns to their management all the time may be seen as bad whereas a nurse continuing to work quietly in a poor environment may be seen as good by a management who is focused on achieving financial aims and targets.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs