Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals Foundation Trust

Short staffing and culture concerns exposed at Wexham Park


An unannounced inspection at Wexham Park Hospital in Slough found evidence of inadequate care, regular short staffing on “almost all wards”, and a culture where “staff did not always feel they could raise concerns”.

The Care Quality Commission has told Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals Foundation Trust, which runs the hospital, to make urgent improvements, after inspectors concluded it was more focused on “responding to… targets” than “ensuring that overall patient experiences were positive”.

Findings from the CQC’s visit to the trust in October were published today. It discovered poor standards of cleanliness and inadequate infection control, evidence of poor record keeping, and that “people’s privacy and dignity was not always respected”.

Of the nine standards checked during the inspection, the trust was judged to have failed all except one – management of medicines.

The regulator raised concerns over leadership and care delivery in Wards 7, 4 and the Acute Medical Unit, where inspectors saw a number of occasions where the quality of care given to patients was below standard.

Inspectors also heard complaints from patients about the quality of nursing care and poor communication, which had resulted in people’s privacy and dignity not always being respected.

Despite a previous warning from the CQC about staffing levels and on-going recruitment efforts by the trust, almost all the wards inspected were found to be regularly short staffed.

In addition, staff did not always feel they could raise concerns or make suggestions, the CQC said, and number of staff expressed concerns about bullying and harassment from managers. In some cases, staff raised concerns with inspectors but were reluctant to be named for fear of reprisals.

CQC regional director Adrian Hughes said: “We found there was a clear emphasis on responding to national and local clinical targets but less emphasis on ensuring that overall patient experiences were positive.”

Mr Hughes added that the regulator would monitor the trust’s improvement actions “closely”, and that it would return to inspect the trust on 11 February.

It is not the first time the CQC has raised concerns and issued warning notices to the trust, which provides services to a population of 450,000 across Ascot, Bracknell, Maidenhead, Slough, south Buckinghamshire and Windsor.

Following an inspection last May, the CQC released an equally damning report which identified quality and management failings and similar problems with staffing levels and patient dignity.

Responding to today’s report, the trust said it was taking a “two-pronged approach of extra training… and improved performance management to ensure all our staff deliver acceptable care”.

It said it had invested over £2m in new staff in the last 12 months and would “continue to actively recruit and use temporary staff where necessary”.

The trust added: “We are disappointed that we have not made as much improvement as the CQC believed we should have in five months. We are committed to making sustainable change and will continue to work hard to drive the improvements we all want to see.”

Following the CQC’s latest warning notices, its fellow regulator Monitor announced a package of regulatory measures to try to help the trust improve.

These include appointment of an improvement director to hold management to account against their action plan, and provision of external expertise to support the trust.


Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


Readers' comments (10)

  • '... and a culture where “staff did not always feel they could raise concerns”.'

    What a surprise!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With the NMCs new revalidation proposals, qualified nurses well now be far less likely to raise concerns for fear of losing their livelihood!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Most nurses are not able to make complaints. I did as a bank nurse and was refused any more shifts at Sunderland Royal Hospital. Staff, those in the NHS and private are effectively gagged
    Grievances are simply ignored
    The majority of staff are dependent on their jobs and that is what managers & companies use against staff. I am at a stage where I can speak out freely against the abuse and poor standards anyone can send me detail and Ill forward the complaint

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Surprise visit booked for 11 February.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 8-Jan-2014 3:50 pm

    What does that mean Tink ?

    Are you going to turn up on the 11th Feb at WPH dressed as a fairy, and then surprise them all by whipping off your outer garments to reveal that you are actually a pixie ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yet more evidence of grossly incompetent "management".

    These clowns need to be held to account.

    The continuing and repeated saga of a management culture associated with an "I don't care" attitude coupled with expectation of a bigger bonus must be bought to an end.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    michael stone | 9-Jan-2014 1:52 pm
    No, not quite. What I mean is I have a feeling that the 11 February will be a very contrived, rehearsed day, with the most outspoken staff, if any, on a day off and the area fully staffed until 12 February.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 9-Jan-2014 6:08 pm

    I must admit to not being acquainted with the detail to this one, but clearly there is to be an inspection on Feb 11th. In the context of that, I'm fairly certain that your comment is right - which is why announced inspections are frequently pointless, of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, there's a surprise... Who would have ever thought Nursing shortages would lead to a problem in the workplace?

    The thought never occurred to Hospital Management 'teams' and their accountancy based masters, who are after all only concerned with bean counting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Government pushed for meeting targets. The ammount of times it was said that these targets were dangerous when working on a day surgery unit with 2 or three patients to a bed or trolley. How could you meet someones privacy and dignity when admitting them in the middle of a waiting room because their trolley space had someone in it. Business managers who had just left university did not understand and would not listen to nurses WHO TOLD THEM IT WAS DANGEROUS because that would mean that targets were not met. These targets ended the real compassion in nursing. Nurses have always been caring and compassionate but were not allowed to be.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs