Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

RCN questions necessity new wilful neglect offence for NHS staff


Nurses and other clinicians found guilty of “wilful neglect” of patients could face prison, under measures due to be published next week by the government, the prime minister has said.

However, the Royal College of Nursing has questioned the necessity of the new law and argued that action should instead be focused on legally enforceable staffing levels.

Wilful neglect will be made a criminal offence and be modelled on one punishable by up to five years in prison under the Mental Capacity Act, according to reports.

The policy is being trailed in the national media today ahead of major government announcements on health and the NHS next week.

It will be officially unveiled next week when ministers publish their full response to the Francis report on care failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust and a series of other high profile reviews that have taken place this year.

A sanction for wilful neglect was one of the recommendations made by Professor Don Berwick in his review of NHS patient safety, the findings of which were published in August.

The involvement of No 10 reveals the importance with which the government response to Francis and the other reviews is being taken.

Commenting on the new law on wilful neglect, David Cameron said: “The NHS is full of brilliant doctors, nurses and other health workers who dedicate their lives to caring for our loved ones.

“But Mid-Staffordshire hospital showed that sometimes the standard of care is not good enough. That is why we have taken a number of different steps that will improve patient care and improve how we spot bad practice.”

He added: “Never again will we allow substandard care, cruelty or neglect to go unnoticed”.

“This is not about a hospital worker who makes a mistake, but specific cases where a patient has been neglected or ill-treated. This offence will make clear that neglect is unacceptable and those who do so will feel the full force of the law.”

In response, Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the RCN, said he would “never excuse those who wilfully neglect patients”.

But he argued that “remedies already exist to tackle staff who are guilty of harming patients and we would question whether a new law is actually required”.

“When things go wrong, as well as looking at the actions of an individual clinician, we also need to look at the whole system that surrounds a care failing. Too often, frontline staff are trying to deliver care against a backdrop of intense pressure and woefully inadequate staffing levels,” he said. 

“If the government are willing to look at introducing new legislation to protect patients, then the area they should be concentrating on is ensuring legally enforceable safe staffing levels. This measure would have the single biggest impact in improving care across the NHS,” he added.

Documents obtained by Nursing Times reveal that the government is planning to tell trusts to act on staffing levels in its response to Francis report, but it will not support a minimum staffing ratio.


Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


Readers' comments (35)

  • I'm curious about what criteria will define 'wilful neglect'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tell you what Dave. You first!! For wilful and malicious destruction of the National Health Service and creating conditions whereby our patients are daily exposed to danger with only the dedicated and courageous staff you are so keen to threaten standing between them and disaster. You and your bunch of criminal henchmen make me sick!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I welcome this proposal: I think the thought of five years behind bars, permanent removal from the NMC register or GMC or whatever, will concentrate the minds of those who may be inclined to do harm to patients through penny-pinching, shockingly-bad management, withholding treatment etc., etc. I think this is long overdue!

    As per usual, Peter Carter and his Stepford tribe just don't get it, their response does not surprise me one little bit.

    These proposals should be welcomed by any hard working nurse as you've nothing to fear from this, but those who collect the large salaries, who make decisions that put people at risk without ever having to meet a patient face-to-face I hope it makes you think twice!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What action will be taken against those who have cut beds, cut staffing, cut budgets, ration treatment, ignore vulnerable groups and wilfully neglect the wellbeing of staff.
    Are doctors and nurses the only people who are involved in patient care?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is focused on some of the examples where nursing staff abused vulnerable patients like those in Winterbourne.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Every other media outlet that covered this story explicitly mentioned hospital managers, but NT - which now seems to be one of the official mouthpieces of the RCN - has chosen to omit this particular noun for effect.

    'All NHS staff, including hospital managers, could face five years in jail if they are found guilty of the most extreme types of poor care' Telegraph, November 16, 2013.

    I really welcome these proposals as I think for too long now, some Consultants, hospital managers and senior nurses have been allowed to get away with making some absolutely shocking decisions that have put patients at serious risk of harm safe in the knowledge that they'd never be held to account for their actions.

    Hopefully just the thought of prison will be enough to make those decision makers think twice, but everyone else has to make sure that they document and report concerns about staffing, decisions to move patients and unsafe practices etc., via IR1s (or whatever your Trust uses). If everyone does it then individuals can't be singled out and bullied.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • People keep saying here, "the thought of prison".
    How about the thought of prison for doing their job keeps people from wanting to become carers, ever!
    I see malicious and ambulance chasing lawyers all over this legislation with trivial claims.
    And no nurse would ever want to be a manager now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nurse Managers will have nothing to fear from these proposals. They will further close ranks and cover their tracks. Remember, they have been doing it for years and are very clever at it. Those ordinary nurses doing a good job actually have a great deal to fear, particularly if they raise concerns. Managers can make it look like your fault. Why can't people understand this? Just ask yourselves why only nurses are singled out for blame and focus of sanctions when all that is wrong in healthcare systems and institutions is complex and multifaceted. It is 'lack of compassion' in the Nursing profession that is exclusively given as the reason.
    These proposals do nothing to address the culture of fear and bullying within healthcare. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see those responsible for neglect go to jail, but they won't, because other things need to change before they can be caught and held to account. Jan Harry, and the lack of complete consequences for her actions and inactions at Mid Staffs, being a case in point. Don't kid yourselves. No managers will go to jail as a result of these proposals and patients will not be better protected. You, on the other hand, had better watch your back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nick Davies | 17-Nov-2013 7:20 am

    "I see malicious and ambulance chasing lawyers all over this legislation with trivial claims."

    Exactly, and people need to wise up about that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We are all already accountable to parliament and the law. We are already vulnerable to being struck off the registers permanently,...well maybe in a yearor two when the NMC has cleared its backlog and not resorting to pragmatic cautions.
    When a govt of PR millionaires introduces a fear based move like this without the necessary changes to enable the problems to be resolved either concommitently or at least in short succession, then the situation will result in further institutionalised bullying and harrassment. You cannot ask, demand or exact something from someone when you are preventing or obstructing their way to managing or resolving the problem.
    Again this translates as another way of holding power over.
    It does however enable an open door for privatising the whole system with the apparent lure of private corporations able to apparently throw money at the problems in a PR glossy hype.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.