Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cameron to defend NHS reform agenda

  • 6 Comments

David Cameron will signal his determination to press ahead with “deep change” in the NHS, warning it faces a fundamental crisis in the future if reforms are blocked.

The prime minister will use a keynote speech to detail some of the reworking being done of the government’s health service shake-up to meet widespread political and professional hostility.

But he will make clear that the controversial package drawn up by Health Secretary Andrew Lansley will not be abandoned as Labour seeks to exploit tensions within the Tory-Lib Dem coalition over the plans.

Speaking at a London hospital, the premier is expected to say: “We save the NHS by changing it. We risk its long-term future by resisting change now.

“I know that some people still have concerns. They might be listening to this and thinking: ‘OK, but if you love the NHS so much, if you don’t want to take any risks with it, why do you want to change it?

“But this is the point: it’s because I love the NHS so much that I want to change it. It needs to change to make it work better today and it needs to change to avoid a crisis tomorrow.”

Mr Cameron’s speech came after a weekend of continued focus on fears among health professionals and patients that the reforms will “destroy essential services”.

Ministers have promised “substantial” changes after buying time by calling a “pause” to the progress of the Health and Social Care Bill pending the results of a “listening exercise” involving patients and health professionals.

The senior doctor leading the urgent review used a newspaper interview to detail a series of concerns highlighted by the process so far - mostly surrounding a push to increase competition.

Professor Steve Field, who chairs the NHS Future Forum, said: “If you had a free market, that would destroy essential services in very big hospitals but also might destroy the services that need to be provided in small hospitals.”

Under the proposals, groups of GPs would be handed control of around £80 billion worth of NHS spending, with a remit to commission treatment and services from “any willing provider” - including private companies.

Labour and other critics warn the changes open the health service to full-blown privatisation - a charge Mr Cameron will again seek to quash in his speech.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has vowed to veto the legislation - elements of which are deeply unpopular among Liberal Democrat MPs and activists - as part of efforts to demonstrate a greater influence by his party in the Tory-led government.

Mr Cameron will say that the “raised passions” in the debate over the Bill proved only that the NHS “is the most important thing to Britain’s families” and that he was right to make it his top priority.

“We have an institution - a precious idea - that says we are in this together; looking out for each other. So this government will never, ever take risks with the NHS. We will make it better,” he is expected to tell his audience.

“I’ll say it again: I love the NHS. But I’m sorry, I just do not think we do anyone any favours, not the patients who use our health service, the professionals who work in it or the taxpayers who pay for it, if we deny that there are problems with the way the NHS works today.”

He will say that the “resounding message” from the patients, doctors and nurses he had met during the listening exercise was: “Yes, we love the NHS but yes, there are some real problems.”

There was waste and inefficiency, too much “top-down control”, inflexibility, a lack of co-ordination and wide disparities of quality of service and of health outcomes in different parts of the country.

“Sticking with the status quo and hoping we can get by with a bit more money is simply not an option. If we stay as we are, the NHS will need £130 billion a year by 2015 - meaning a potential funding gap of £20 billion.”

 

  • 6 Comments

Readers' comments (6)

  • here goes the son of thatcher again

    they are just not listening, people dont want this change, this privatisation of our nhs

    these reforms are not needed and especially now with the savings that have to be made

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here here!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mr Cameron why don't you just go over to the American system where only the ruch can afford health care and you will not be treated if you have insurance and then get kicked out of hospital once it runs out(!)(!)(!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So much for the vaunted 'listening excercise then eh?

    “Yes, we love the NHS but yes, there are some real problems.”

    That is NOT the resounding message from healthcare professionals Cameron, not unless you count the hand wringing yes men and nodding dogs you would have cherry picked for your consultations.

    As I have said on another post, I find the way they are doing this very worrying. Yes, we all know there are huge problems with the NHS, and we all have been saying for a long time things need to change. HOWEVER, that does not mean that THESE changes are the right ones, that does not mean that the government can ride roughshod over the considered opinions of experts 'on the frontline' such as us just so they can drive through their reforms, especially when Doctors, Nurses and other health professionals alike have said they will not work and will cause a lot more problems in the long run. THAT is the overiding message from us. For example, Cameron is right in the fact that clinicians need to be in charge of the NHS, not a tier of management. But why does 'clinician' for the government simply mean GP? Why does he think that handing control solely to GP consortiums would get rid of “top-down control, inflexibility, and a lack of co-ordination"???? Why will introducing privatisation into the NHS be a magic panacea for all its ills? Yes I agree that some aspects of it has merits, however, so does continuing to run the NHS as a solely state funded body but with vastly decreased wastage of funds.

    Yes there are changes - perhaps some big ones - that need to be made within the NHS, but these are not the right changes, and this is not the way to go about doing them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As our line manager said today "there will be a copy of this proposal sent out for consultation, but I would remind you that consultation is NOT negotiation."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Deirdre Budd | 16-May-2011 6:32 pm

    Unfortunately, this is an attitude shared by rather too many managers. I wonder how the 'no negotiation' stance would change if nurses actually refused to accept the unacceptable and took action?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.