Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

In depth

Ensuring safe and appropriate discharge for people who are homeless or in housing need

  • 1 Comment

An outline of the factors nurses need to consider when preparing homeless people for discharge from hospital

 

 

Authors

Kate Tansley, BA, NVQ, is homeless health initiative coordinator, Queen’s Nursing Institute; Jane Gray, PGCert, BSc, RGN, INP, is consultant nurse, Leicester Homeless Healthcare Service.
 

Abstract

Tansley, K., Gray, J. (2009) Ensuring safe and appropriate discharge for people who are homeless or in housing need. Nursing Times; 105: 40, early online publication.

Inappropriate admission and discharge practice is common for homeless and vulnerably housed people. This article outlines the key points from protocol guidance and details some DH case studies, highlighting the essential practice points for nurses.

Keywords: Homelessness, Hospital discharge, Hospital admission

  • This article has been double-blind peer-reviewed.

 

Practice points

  • Nurses working with homeless and vulnerably housed people and involved in hospital discharge can take the following steps to improve practice:Read the hospital admission and discharge protocol guidance (see Box 1) and consider how to adopt this locally;
  • Contact local homelessness services and, where they exist, homeless health services, to build links. This can often be done with the support of the Queen’s Nursing Institute Homeless Health Initiative to find relevant contacts (see Box 1).
  • Join the QNI Homeless Health Initiative, which is free to join for nurses working with homeless people and offers support.


Introduction

Homeless people and hospitals are often blighted by inappropriate admission and discharge practice, which creates a “revolving door” situation, where homeless people’s multiple health and other needs are never fully addressed. This can lead to regular readmissions, lengthy hospital stays, and loss of housing or failure to find appropriate accommodation. Often this problem is due to a lack of communication between services and lack of the appropriate procedures and can happen in both general and mental health facilities. 
Staff working in both health and homelessness services can find admission, discharge and joint working challenging. They need more support and information to ensure safe and appropriate discharge for homeless people. Nurses are often the key professionals who can take this work forward. This article provides information about guidance on improving care for homeless people, including national government guidance and recent case studies.


Background

Homeless people experience significant health inequalities. For example, the average life expectancy for rough sleepers is 42 (Crisis, 1996). Homeless people are 40 times more likely to not be registered with a GP, yet four times more likely to use A&E, than the general population (Crisis, 2002). Examples of local homelessness services include day centres, hostels, soup runs and housing advice centres. Specialist homeless health services may sometimes be offered at such venues, but this varies in different areas.

National guidance on homelessness and hospital admission and discharge concludes: “Most homeless people….have poorer health than the general population. People living in temporary or insecure accommodation have difficulty accessing primary care which means that they often do not seek treatment until the problem is at an advanced stage. Once admitted to hospital, they can present a complex medical and social picture” (Department of Communities and Local Government et al, 2006). The guidance states that homeless people often self-discharge due to sometimes unrecognised mental health or substance misuse problems, or anxiety about losing insecure accommodation.
The first key action point when working with patients is identifying their housing status, vulnerabilities and any key working at an early stage. This should ideally be established on admission.
Hospital staff may not be aware when people are homeless. Not all homeless people will be recorded as no fixed abode (NFA) or  hostel dwellers.  Those staying temporarily with friends may give their friends’ address or hostel as their home. Therefore it is vital to ask about housing status directly.

Unfortunately, hostels may also be unaware that a resident has been admitted to hospital, so their bed may be given to someone else. On discharge, lack of notice can mean unnecessary, distressing delays in locating another hostel space.
Rough sleepers who are ready for discharge will almost certainly have ongoing health needs needing careful follow up. They need somewhere safe and warm to go to ensure full recovery, but often discharge is delayed due to lack of a place being found, or they are simply discharged back onto the street. Some areas may discharge homeless people and signpost them to the local housing department, without realising that finding a hostel bed takes notice and planning.

The relationship between poor health and lack of housing is significant, and yet may not be considered by healthcare professionals preparing a homeless person for discharge. This might be the case even though considerable time, effort and funding may have been invested in that person’s care while an inpatient. Unfortunately, discharging to no fixed abode can result in rapid deterioration in health and readmission.  

The Department of Communities and Local Government, Department of Health, Homeless Link and the London Network for Nurses and Midwives published joint guidance on hospital admission and discharge for homeless people (Department of Communities and Local Government et al, 2006). This provides a vital and valuable framework and has been used successfully in some areas. Yet many other areas remain unaware or have still not implemented it, causing ongoing problems for hospitals and homeless people.


Key aspects of the guidance

The aims of the guidance are to enable timely, appropriate and safe discharge, and reduce readmissions, length of hospital stays and self-discharge by guiding professionals in how to set up a local protocol.
Partnership working is the key to this and its value cannot be overstated. The protocol identifies nine important steps to implement better hospital admission and discharge for homeless people. A summary of these is given below.
Step one: identify relevant organisations, such as hospital, PCT, housing department, social services, and voluntary sector (including local homelessness hostels and day centres). It is essential for all agencies to feel ownership of the protocol to be developed. Involving key people and demonstrating to them the good practice and cost effectiveness of such protocols is crucial. Ideally, champions in each organisation should be found.
Step two: set up a steering group – ensure all relevant groups are represented, establish roles and responsibilities, set progress review dates, and consider the long term need for such a group.
Step three: review existing systems including what happens currently when homeless people are admitted and discharged, and consider potential gaps and need for new systems. A larger information-gathering meeting involving many partners could be held for this purpose.
Step four: identify training and resource needs. This involves identifying key skills and extra resources needed to implement such a protocol, for example, look at the training for hospital staff on understanding homelessness, and set up a resource book or other source of information on homelessness and services in the local area.
Step five: develop a protocol building on existing systems – it should link to current processes. Identify key people to lead on implementation, and set up a protocol for sharing information.
Step six: ensure the protocol is fit for purpose. Ideally it should include: establishing patients’ housing status on admission; procedures for obtaining consent to information-sharing; procedures for ensuring accommodation is not lost (such as communicating with hostels, landlords and so on); identifying key agencies to notify about a homeless person’s hospital admission; developing resources and training needed; and involving key agencies such as NHS, local authority and voluntary sector organisations. Step seven: test and monitor the protocol. Ensure it is piloted and the impact is monitored, and that the steering group remains in place to oversee implementation. Finally, brief appropriate staff.
Step eight: Set up audit arrangements - ensure the audit procedure is in place to monitor the protocol’s impact on staff and patient experiences, patterns of admission, readmission and discharge for homeless people, level of self-discharge and actual date of discharge.
Step nine: review and refine the protocol in response to feedback from homeless people, health staff, local authority staff, voluntary sector staff (and volunteers), incident reports/complaints and audits.

Recent evidence

St Mungo’s Health Report (Bilton, 2008) showed that 83% of homeless people were discharged without a treatment plan. Their Health Strategy (St Mungo’s, 2008) added: “We have particular concerns about the small number of people who are discharged each year for whom there is no suitable destination in the community and who died without dignity as a result.”
Another recent report, Discharged to no Fixed Abode (Shapps, 2008), revealed that between 2003 and 2007, there was a 36% rise in the number of homeless people being discharged from hospital with no fixed abode.In this report, 67% of hospital trusts responding to a survey were unable to identify “an existing policy addressing homeless patients”.
The QNI Homeless Health Initiative (HHI) began operating in June 2007, providing support to nurses working with people without a secure home. The Big Lottery Fund provided funding for three years and HHI offers professional development, resources and networking opportunities. We now have around 500 members working across the country with homeless people. 
We have discussed hospital admission and discharge with frontline nurses and through our research with 25 homeless people commissioned through Groundswell UK (2008), a service user involvement organisation.

One extreme case highlighted in this research was a homeless person who reported: “I was beaten up and I had stitches. Two o’clock in the morning they’re throwing me out. The next day I was vomiting blood.” But even in less extreme cases, the majority were negative experiences, although there were a couple of encouraging examples.
On a positive note, through a recent study of the work of the HHI, wehave noted improvements in hospital discharge in some areas. A number of forthcoming HHI case studies, written from May-June 2009 and due to be published in November, have identified achievements in improving hospital admission and discharge for homeless people.

In one of these case studies, a nurse said her local hospital had often been discharging people who were NFA to the street, particularly after hours. The nurse drew up an admission and discharge protocol in partnership with other agencies after seeing all the information through HHI. The nurse reported: “The audit clearly shows an excellent improvement in ensuring discharging [to] NFA isn’t the norm, particularly at night. It also shows how agencies are communicating better regarding risks etc.”
Another HHI member’s analysis of hospital admissions and discharges in her local hospital identified a number of people making unplanned visits to hospital who had no address and/or GP. She approached HHI for support and was invited to join the initiative and attend a Growing your homeless health service workshop. Her colleague reported: “Practice at how to present information to access money, to improve services, has resulted in my colleague securing funds to be seconded from her current position as community matron, to enable her to shape services for homeless individuals with chronic, complex health issues, with a view to preventing revolving door attendance at A&E and unnecessary hospital admissions.”

These and other HHI case studies due to be published in November 2009 demonstrate the important leadership role that nurses can take in improving hospital admission and discharge for homeless people.
 

New case studies

In July 2009, the DH published three useful case studies of areas in which protocols or specialist roles had been developed (Housing Learning and Improvement Network, 2009). The publication of these diverse studies focuses fresh attention on how hospital admission and discharge for homeless people can be improved.
The author argues convincingly that hospital admission is an opportunity for homeless people and services: “The rough sleepers outreach service describes its work in terms of windows of opportunity, describing how homeless people go through moments when they are really motivated to change their situation. An admission to hospital, when they are alone, out of the madness of life on the street, scared about their health and de-toxed, offers a massive opportunity to services to start working with that individual.”


Case study: London (Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals)

Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals appointed a discharge coordinator for homeless patients, with previous experience of homelessness services, over two years ago.

One hospital staff member described what happened before this post existed: “We pretty much just kicked them out to the homeless persons unit – [although] with those that had obvious issues such as mental health or substance misuse issues we would try to link them in somewhere. It was very ad hoc.”
The street outreach service agreed: “They would be rushed out with no forward planning and six days later they would be back.”
The hospitals can refer patients who are unable to return home, but are reasonably self caring,tothe nearby Simon Patient Hotel for patients. They can stay there between one day and six weeks. This is paid for by the NHS and can be used for homeless people seeking alternative accommodation.
Examples of the coordinator’s work:

  • Contacted all street outreach services, day centres and hostels to make her service known and explain the hospital system and pressure on hospitals to discharge medically fit people;
  • Ensured that posters are displayed on all the wards about her role;
  • Ensured staff are aware that on admission, patients should be asked about their housing status and, if homeless, refer to her;
  • Accessed the LondonCombined Homelessness and Information System (CHAIN), to view the history of clients’ engagement with services and access information to help with support planning and linking to services.

Benefits of this work:

  • Street outreach respondents say they are now generally given notice of discharges, can ensure prescriptions are ready and coordinate with hospitals. This includes more key worker involvement;
  • Better informed, more efficient discharges – the coordinator has access to vital information on patients’ housing history and other details:“Before we were literally discharging onto a blank canvas… When she is on leave a whole day can be spent chasing housing benefits, ID, birth certificates, someone with specialist knowledge can cut through a lot of it”;
  • Helping to keep hostel beds open for patients where possible; 
  • Complex cases are reviewed at meetings;
  • Better coordination between hospitals and homelessness staff;
  • Hospital staff now have a better understanding of homeless people, can draw on expertise and can avoid feeling so overwhelmed by their needs.

 

 Case study: West Sussex

A post ofhousing health and social care coordinator was createdto take forward the older people’s strategy, and later extended to all adults.Before this post was put in place, healthcare staff were concerned that there were a small number of people with complex health, social care and housing needs occupying hospital beds for long periods. They needed a furnished and disabled-adapted property for people waiting for a housing solution.
Housing staff were concerned that people were often discharged to the homelessness team, with just a letter stating there was a housing need. They said they needed to know from admission about any housing needs.  
This led to the creation of the new post. Relevant staff were invited to a multidisciplinary meeting and a work plan was developed. The plan was then taken forward by the coordinator and through homelessness forums. Examples of work carried out included:

  • Homelessness was included in a review of the hospital’s discharge process;
  • Discharge folders were created with information on local housing/homelessness services;
  • A flowchart was included in the discharge procedure on what staff need to do if someone is homeless;
  • Staff now fill in housing register applications, and carry out any investigations into homelessness, while the person is in hospital. This avoids bed-blocking;
  • Training was offered on housing and homelessness for hospital staff.

Benefits identified included:

  • Significant reduction in patients being delayed in leaving hospital due to their housing needs - in 2006 32% of patients were delayed for this reason and remained in hospital beds. By 2008 this reduced to 7%;
  • Better relationships between agencies;
  • More effective early notification about patients who are either homeless or who have a housing need;
  • Savings on bed and breakfast accommodation costs;
  • Preventing the necessity for people who were/are unwell to declare themselves homeless and make a housing application through the local council on discharge from hospital;
  • Massive reduction in last minute telephone calls to the local council stating that someone was about to be discharged and requesting them to deal with this and find accommodation at very short notice;
  • Jointly commissioned a pilot for a registered social landlord to provide a disabled adapted property, and reviewed after nine months. This showed it had saved 251 hospital bed days, saving £63,000 of health resources;
  • More linking in at strategic levels regarding homelessness.

 

Lessons to learn

Another case study was from Newcastle, where no specific new post was created to address the issues, but a multidisciplinary working group was developed with a lead person identified from the local authority. Improvements were also made in this case, including better joint working, greater clarity for staff, a follow up protocol, and the feeling of a positive experience for mental health nurses. For further information, see tinyurl.com/newcastle-protocol and tinyurl.com/three-case-studies.
There are many lessons to be learnt from these case studies. The admission of a homeless person to hospital is rightly seen as a “window of opportunity” to implement improvements while they are off the streets. If this opportunity is missed, their health problems will often fail to be addressed and this can lead to repeat admissions, difficult for patients and costly to the system. The case studies also highlight how the work cuts across several sectors and the only way positive outcomes can be achieved is through good joined up working.
Local differences were important. In a large urban area with potentially higher numbers of homeless people, it can be worth creating a specialist homelessness discharge coordinator post. In areas with smaller numbers, creating such a post might not be feasible, but it may be possible to create the post of a discharge coordinator to manage all adults with housing related needs.

Another option is to set up the protocol with overall leadership from one sector such as housing or health, and a steering group with sector leads. All areas should assess homeless people’s local health needs (including hospital admission and discharge) as part of their joint strategic needs assessments.
One significant aspect to consider is the role of a champion or lead person - all the evidence suggests how important this role is. This person would take responsibility for driving through continuing improvements. There are also roles for champions/leaders in each sector, such as hospitals or homeless health services.

Nurses are important leaders in this area and are well placed to champion this both on the frontline, and in strategic roles. This can also be an excellent development opportunity for them.
Thus the role of “identified lead nurse”, to coordinate and advise, is extremely important. Other nurses and all staff (whether health, local authority or voluntary sector) involved in hospital admission and discharge also need to develop skills to ensure safe and appropriate discharge for homeless people in the absence of a lead person. No admission and discharge procedure should rely on a single person to make it happen.

Conclusion

There are many opportunities for nurses to build their knowledge and understanding of homeless people and their needs. They can also use the many other people who understand homeless people’s needs for advice and support. Key homeless agencies have already been identified in this article, and their staff can be a rich source of support, guidance and facilitate practical solutions to issues that arise. Practitioners can also choose to raise the issue locally and start the process of implementing improvements through the national guidance.

Nurses caring for homeless people and hospital nurses can build robust working relationships with each other and partner agencies, improving everyone’s understanding of roles and responsibilities. This in turn creates a collaborative environment to ensure smooth and efficient delivery of services to patients, whether they are going into hospital or coming out. It also supports homeless people to access services and routes out of homelessness, to build new lives and prevent readmissions.

Box 1. Useful resources and further reading

Department of Communities and Local Government et al (2006) Hospital Admission and Discharge: People who are Homeless or Living in

Temporary or Insecure Accommodation. London: DfCLG.

QNI Homeless Health Initiative - free support for nurses including a network, professional development and resources.
Click here or email kate.tansley@qni.org.uk to join.

Newcastle City Council’s protocol - for hospital discharge and homelessness prevention

QNI briefing paper- on health and homelessness issues

QNI article - by nurse Anne Milner on how she put the guidance into practice

Homeless UK - a national website helping to identify local homelessness services



 

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is not the staff, either in the CMHT or the council that cause our problems with housing. It's no housing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.