Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hospitals can be dangerous - medics

  • 3 Comments

Patients should be treated in the community rather than in hospitals because they can be “dangerous places”, some of the UK’s leading doctors have warned.

The NHS Alliance, which represents GPs and primary care staff, said that all non-urgent care should be shifted from hospitals into the community as an “immediate imperative” to keep people safe.

The appeal comes as the government’s new health adviser warned that a robust new culture was needed in the NHS to restore public trust to the health service.

Professor Don Berwick, who has been appointed to lead a review of patient safety in the NHS in the wake of the Mid Staffordshire hospital scandal, said that “zero harm” was the only way for the NHS to go, saying: “Why should we tolerate a single injury?”

The NHS Alliance said that only the most serious cases should be treated in hospital, as they “dangerous places” shunned by their own medical staff, the Times said.

In a letter to the newspaper the alliance’s president Dr Chris Drinkwater and chairman Dr Michael Dixon said: “If we are to put people before numbers and achieve high quality of care, as well as keeping an NHS free at the point of need for future generations we must, as an immediate imperative, shift all non-urgent care from hospital into the community.”

The alliance is also calling for the appointment of a GP with the same level of seniority as the Chief Medical Officer.

Dr Dixon told The Times: “We need to work towards the point when acute hospital admissions should be regarded as a failure rather than a default position.

“Hospitals can be dangerous, particularly for older patients and those with long-term conditions. There is a risk of infection and nutrition is complicated for those who cannot feed themselves.

“We should aim to keep them out of hospital as long as possible.”

He added: “Primary care holds the key to improving patient health. Over the past few years there has been an enormous shift (of resources) from primary to secondary care. Now people are fighting their own bit of their health corner.”

Prof Berwick, who used to advise US president Barack Obama, told the Daily Telegraph the NHS could become the safest health care system in the world, and should aspire to be as safe as the aviation industry.

Citing the Mid Staffordshire “tragedy” as a catalyst for improvements, he said “Zero harm is morally and ethically the right way to go. Why should we tolerate a single injury? There is no reason why English health care cannot aspire to be and become the safest health care in the world.”

But he said attitudes needed to change so that “no harm should be regarded as acceptable.

“That may be very aspirational, but in the world-class safety systems they generally have an attitude that even a single injury is problematic.

“Airlines have now achieved safety that many would have thought impossible in such a complex area.”

 

Sign our Speak Out Safely petition to support a transparent and open NHS. We are calling on the government to implement recommendations from the Francis report that will increase protection for staff who raise concerns about patient care.

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • acute hospital admissions a failure - no, it's because people become acutely sick. Patients, regardless of age or condition get admitted because there is no alternative.

    the airline industry safe? - really, how many deaths have there been - nearly 3,000 when I looked it up.

    shifting to the community - we have all been saying that for years since the last conservative govt decided that they needed to close hospitals. There was and still is insufficient community care, nursing homes, long-stay hospitals, mental health units- etc. etc. the list goes on and on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • English health care? Seems the Taffs and the Jocks will be having their own. Roll on devolution, I'll move to Rhyl.

    Also, NT, the quality of the writing in a lot of your reports leaves a lot to be desired. Do you have a room full of chimps mashing a keyboard until one comes up with something that looks like it could possibly be in English?

    As for the good Prof, unless we get staff or are allowed to bed restrain certain patients, then this no injury wish will be like my ma's piecrusts- nice, crumbles at the first inspection.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • what is an injury? - a fall that cannot be prevented, a pressure sore that cannot be prevented, weight loss that cannot be prevented?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.