Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NHS must reform to survive - Lansley

  • 4 Comments

The NHS will not be able to meet the demands of people with long-term conditions such as diabetes and asthma unless it changes, according to the health secretary.

There will be a 252% increase in the number of over-65s with one or more such conditions by 2050, Andrew Lansley said.

Almost one in three people currently have a long-term condition, such as asthma, heart and lung disease, arthritis, high blood pressure or diabetes.

Mr Lansley said the NHS needs to change if it is to cope with the growing numbers, including providing more support to keep people out of hospital, which also saves money.

But the head of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) said Mr Lansley’s NHS reforms are leading to thousands of job cuts, including among nurses who specialise in long-term conditions.

Dr Peter Carter said the cuts will put vulnerable patients at risk and the reforms will cost billions.

Mr Lansley’s overhaul of the NHS, which will see 80% of the budget handed to GPs to commission services, has come in for widespread criticism.

Several unions have raised fears over the increased use of private companies, while doctors, nurses and midwives have raised concerns about the impact on patient care.

Figures from the Department of Health show people with long-term conditions are the biggest users of the NHS, accounting for about 50% of GP appointments and 70% of inpatient hospital beds.

Mr Lansley said: “An increasing number of people are living with long-term illness, and increasingly two or more serious illnesses.

“The average cost of someone without a long-term condition is around £1,000, which rises to £3,000 for someone with one condition and to £8,000 for people with three or more conditions.

“The additional associated cost pressure of caring for people with multiple co-morbidities could reach £4 billion by 2016.

“That’s one reason why we need to modernise the health service and the way we care for patients.

“There isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution to our health - particularly for those who have a number of different conditions.”

Mr Lansley said the “modernised NHS” will see local health experts in charge, who will have the “power and the budget to put the overall health of their patient first.”

Sir John Oldham, national clinical lead for quality and productivity for the NHS, said: “If we continue to manage people with long-term conditions as we do now, the NHS is not sustainable.

“We have unwittingly created a more fragmented system.”

He said patients received “sub-optimal care” if they were cared for by lots of different people in a fragmented service rather than one team.

Follow @Aseatontheboard on twitter follow for all the latest campaign news! Sign now and ensure nurses have a seat on consortia boards.

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • what planet is this bafoon on!!!

    thousands of nurses are loosing their jobs as we speak
    this re-organisation is costing 3 billion pounds!!

    but its ok because the private companies, who be such a coincidence, bankroll these tory idiots, will profit when this privatisation of the nhs goes ahead
    well thats ok then bankers get richer by the day and these companies are rubbing their hands at having a slice of this 80 billion

    this idiot has to be stopped because if not the nhs will be lost for ever....funny just what thatcher wanted as well!!!!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sally Low, Mr Landsleys missus is director of a lobbying consultancy Low Associates which has been employed by Tribal a healthcare outsourcing provider to provide tame G.Ps to sell to the public the benefits of G.P. managed fundholding.

    Souce spinwatch.org

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


  • For a more balanced picture see also:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coalition-may-backtrack-on-nhs-reform-plans-2240977.html
    and
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/13/nhs-reforms-overhaul-liberal-democrats
    and
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/8379284/Andrew-Lansley-signals-retreat-over-NHS-reforms.html

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • having lived and worked in the USA where this crap system is in place I have seen what misery it can cause

    if you have the money..your fine you get the best

    if you have not..forget it

    i remember a friend of mine had a jet ski accident in which he collided head on with another jet skier
    he would not go to hospital and get checked for fear of how much it would cost

    few days later he blacked out and was found to have a clot on his brain
    is this the way we are going to go??

    lansley your an idiot (carnt write the exact phrase I was going to use!!!)
    leave our nhs alone and go and play in the traffic!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs