Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

RCN issues warning over public health nursing workforce


The government must clarify what will happen to the public health nursing workforce before it attempts to implement its reforms on the ground, the Royal College of Nursing has warned.

The Department of Health yesterday published details of the public health outcomes framework, the system under which the progress of local authorities will be judged after responsibility for public health is transferred to them from primary care trusts in April 2013.

The 66 indicators in the framework are grouped into four domains: improving the wider determinants of health; health improvement; health protection; and healthcare public health and preventing premature mortality.

But RCN chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter said that while the college welcomed the document it was also “acutely aware that changes have already been happening on the ground”.

He said: “There is certainly a great deal of work to be done in tackling major public health issues such as obesity, alcohol and sexual health and nurses have a key role to play in this.

“In order to achieve these goals the government needs to take its dedicated NHS staff with them, yet it appears to have completely disregarded the impact these changes will have on the workforce with many set to be transferred to local authorities without fair consultation.

“The RCN has consistently argued that trade unions should be fully engaged as stakeholders in this process and that staff retain NHS pay, terms and conditions, with access to an NHS pension,” Mr Carter warned.

“Anything less could lead to fragmentation and put people off public health as a career path. Information on the workforce strategy must be made available as soon as possible or the government risks damaging the very system it wants to improve,” he said.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley also announced on Monday that around £5.2bn would be allocated in total for public health in 2013-14.

The Department of Health confirmed to Nursing Times that around £2.2bn of the total would go to local authorities, £2.2bn to the NHS commissioning Board, £210m to Public Health England, and £620m to the Department of Health for campaigns.

Full responsibility for public health will pass from PCTs to councils from April 2013, though councils are set to receive “shadow” budget allocations for 2012-13 over coming weeks so they can start to work more closely with PCTs on planning public health services.

The £5.2bn represents the first time the government has set a figure for public health funding since a questionable £4bn estimate of current spending was first mentioned in the white paper in November 2010.

The government was strongly criticised by the Commons health committee for failing to explain how it had arrived at the £4bn estimate in October last year.

King’s Fund senior fellow on public health David Buck said the rise from the £4bn estimate to the £5.2bn figure did not mean the government was “being more generous”, rather that the new number was a “more tangible figure”.

He added that “£2.2bn divided by 150 [upper unitary councils] doesn’t look very much”.  

In December 2010 the Department of Health published proposals on who would have primary responsibility for funding, commissioning and providing different public health services.

Most local public health services, including sexual health, school nursing and other services for children and young people aged five to 19, will be funded and commissioned by local authorities from their new public health budget allocation.

Other services will be commissioned by the NHS Commissioning Board. These include health visiting, the Family Nurse Partnership, immunisation, screening and public health for those in prison or custody.


Readers' comments (6)

  • Didn't you know that nurses are part human/part robot? When we signed up for nurse training we all agreed to have frontal lobotomies so that we could work long hours and regularly take part in complex emotional scenarios without it affecting us at all....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Steve Williams

    Great Job NT Tl;DR (if you don't get the joke go to;DR and maybe you might get an idea)

    Once again the RCN/NT media uses smoke and mirrors in order to deflect Nurses from the real issues that are actually happening at this time,

    Playing the government's tune or what?

    A non-story compared to the end of the NHS or what?


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Look away now if you don't like swear words, no not really only joking. Think i have got the swearing off my chest for this week about this governments treachery. will try to spend it serenely thinking of fluffy kittens, and walking around with my blindfold on, my sanity hanging by a thread. I can stans it no longer, feeling the swearing coming back. It's only our wonderful NHS on the line,going down the tubes pronto, what the F*** does anyone care about that. Still at least eastenders is on tonight.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    What if the clarification is 'your services are no longer required?'

    I have thrown all my toys out of the pram now and only have my rattle left. Mr Lansley you have my address, pop over, bend closely into my pram, whack!. That for you.

    You can get more with a smile and a rattle than you can with just a smile. Swearing alone is not going to do it for me anymore, I am moving up the continium of passive, assertive towards aggressive.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Given the RCN's long and ignoble history of backstabbing health visiting, I doubt if they mean this, or even fully understand the issues.

    They're in a little world of their own in Cav Square, secure jobs, overpaid and with plump pensions to look forward to. There's only so much nonsense I am prepared to fund from my hard earned salary. I shall cancel my membership forthwith.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do they meant the councils will have control over nurses? Why? I don't understand any of this...
    Someone please explain...
    Thank you!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.