Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Review

Factors affecting patient outcomes in acute non-invasive ventilation

  • Comment

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death undertook a study to ascertain aspects of care that could be improved for patients receiving non-invasive ventilation

Abstract

Many patients need to be treated with acute non-invasive ventilation in hospital but the care they receive is not always adequate or standardised. Several factors can negatively affect mortality so it is important that health professionals and hospital managers know what these are, and that staff are assessed to ensure they have the necessary competencies to provide non-invasive ventilation. This article summarises the findings of a recent report by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death that was undertaken to identify the factors that have a negative effect on patient care that can be avoided or remedied.

Citation: Ellis G (2018) Factors affecting outcomes in patients receiving acute non-invasive ventilation. Nursing Times [online]; 114: 3, 34-37.

Author: Gemma Ellis is clinical coordinator at the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, London.

Introduction

Acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is most commonly used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD is the second most common reason for hospital admission and accounts for 25% of all deaths from lung disease in the UK (British Lung Foundation, 2008), so it is vital to ensure that patients with the condition receive appropriate treatment.

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death undertook a review of the provision of NIV in the UK (NCEPOD, 2017). The overall aim of the study was to identify and explore avoidable and remediable factors in the process of care for patients treated acutely with NIV. The study objectives focused on:

  • Prompt recognition of ventilatory failure and rapid initiation of NIV;
  • Appropriate documentation and management of ventilator settings;
  • Escalation of treatment decisions and planning, including admission to critical care;
  • Organisational aspects of care delivery for NIV.

Method

The study population consisted of patients aged 16 years or older who were admitted as an emergency between 1 February 2015 and 31 March 2015 inclusive, and who received NIV acutely. Patients were excluded if they were already on long-term NIV treatment or if they received continuous positive airway pressure and not NIV (both have the same Office of Population Censuses and Surveys code, which is the procedural classification used by clinical coders in the NHS).

Study population and design

In total, 9,299 patients were identified and a sample of 678 cases – which was limited to five cases per hospital within the UK – was selected for analysis through the use of a clinical questionnaire completed by the consultant responsible for the patient. Photocopied case-note extracts were reviewed in detail by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, and a total of 353 sets of notes and 432 clinical questionnaires were completed. Data was also requested from each organisation in the form of a questionnaire, which included information on:

  • The staff that manage NIV;
  • Locations where patients treated with NIV were managed;
  • Guidelines and standard operating procedures relevant to the management of patients on NIV.

Key findings

Within the patient group studied, 43.1% were male. The average age of males was 71.1 years, and 72.3 years for females. The majority of these patients were moderately or severely frail, as identified by the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood et al, 2005), and 53% had two or more comorbid conditions.

Clinical frailty on its own is increasingly recognised as a syndrome associated with poor clinical outcomes and has also been shown to be an independent predictor of inpatient mortality. In 70% of the cases studied, the primary admission diagnosis was COPD.

The overall mortality rate in the peer-reviewed cases was 34.6%. The factors associated with mortality in patients treated with acute NIV are outlined in Table 1.

table 1 factors associated with mortality in patients treated with niv

Monitoring

Physiological track-and-trigger systems have been recommended for use in all acute areas (1000 Lives Improvement, 2013; Royal College of Physicians, 2012; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2007; NCEPOD, 2005). The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) was introduced by the Royal College of Physicians in 2012 as the recommended track-and-trigger system in the UK. This is a validated system used for hospital patients: the higher a patient’s score, the higher their risk of death. Escalation and clinical review are built into the NEWS system and a score of 5-6 requires urgent review by a doctor or acute team nurse.

Early warning scores were not consistently documented in the study population – in 47% of cases, they were not used. In those individuals for whom NEWS was used, 56% had a score of six or more, indicating the need for urgent clinical review (Fig 1). At initial triage, the score was nine or more in 17% of patients, suggesting the need for a critical care assessment; this group of patients requires rapid assessment and frequent monitoring.

fig 1 initial scores in patients with early warning scores

Oxygen

For patients with COPD, a target oxygen saturation of 88-92% is recommended (British Thoracic Society [BTS], 2017) as higher levels of oxygen can contribute to acute hypercapnic ventilator failure and, as such, a requirement for NIV. At initial triage, 47% of the patients studied had an oxygen saturation >92%. Peer reviewers considered that oxygen toxicity contributed to hypercapnia in 27% of the cases, while clinicians in their own hospitals considered that oxygen toxicity contributed to hypercapnia in 23% of patients.

In almost a third of cases (32%), the reviewers found that oxygen was not administered appropriately in the emergency department and, where the oxygen delivery device was recorded, only 17% used a venturi mask. Achieving the appropriate target oxygen saturation and better-controlled oxygen delivery will improve the care of this patient group and potentially reduce the need for NIV.

Service organisation and protocols

There is clear variation in how NIV services are organised: only 23% of hospitals had out-of-hours cover by a respiratory consultant at all times, while only 80% of respiratory wards were able to provide continuous oxygen saturation monitoring. Just under half of the hospitals in the study (49%) had a defined ratio of nurses to NIV patients, as previously recommended by the BTS (2008).

As recommended in the BTS (2008) guidelines, 97% of the hospitals had a local guideline or protocol for the provision of NIV. Most of these listed indications, contraindications and a recommendation to make an escalation plan when initiating NIV treatment. Prescription forms, on the other hand, were not used in 31% of the hospitals and 17% did not have an NIV-specific observation chart.

Documentation

Reviewers felt that monitoring could have been improved in 46% of the cases and that the frequency of documented NIV observations was not appropriate in 33% of cases reviewed. The reviewers were also of the opinion that ventilator settings were not adequately documented in 51% of the cases. Use of a prescription form and a standard NIV observation chart can improve reliability of patient treatment and monitoring. Some hospitals had exceptionally well-structured observation charts but, at times, these were inadequately completed, as highlighted by the case study in Box 1.

Box 1. Case study

A patient with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was admitted to the acute respiratory unit with a respiratory rate of 28, a CO2 level of 9.4kPa and a pH of 7.25. He was started promptly on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and slowly improved. Ventilation was continued for four days and the patient was discharged a week later. The reviewers commented that the records contained a well-designed NIV observation chart. Despite the good outcome, it was difficult to comment on the quality of NIV treatment as the chart for monitoring vital signs and ventilator settings was poorly completed.

Source: NCEPOD, 2017

Ventilator management

Ventilator management was felt to be inappropriate in 35% of the cases reviewed, with inspired positive airway pressure not documented in 25% of the cases. Despite 82% of the hospitals reporting a competency assessment for the delivery of NIV, more than a third allowed staff without this competency to supervise patients on NIV.

Implications for nursing and nursing services

There are many opportunities for nurses to improve the quality and consistency of care for patients requiring acute NIV. Physiological track-and-trigger systems provide a common language for the monitoring, review and escalation of patients who are at risk of deterioration. Patients requiring acute NIV are mostly older people, frail and vulnerable. They will require rapid assessment and frequent monitoring; vital signs should be recorded at least hourly until the respiratory acidosis has resolved.

Documentation of all changes to ventilator settings is essential and NCEPOD recommends the use of a standardised pro forma, an example of which is provided in the appendices of its report (NCEPOD, 2017). To provide patients with the close monitoring they require during the acute phase of NIV, NCEPOD also concurs with the BTS recommendations that a ratio of one nurse to two patients be required as a minimum. It is recognised that the length of time for which this should continue will be determined by each patient’s response to NIV; this does not necessarily mean the patient will require transfer to a level 2 area (high dependency unit) and will depend on how services are organised within individual hospitals.

Having the correct level of competency to care for patients requiring NIV is essential. NCEPOD recommends that all staff who prescribe, or make changes to, acute NIV treatment must have the required level of competency as stated in their hospital operational policy. A list of competent staff should be maintained. The operational policy should include:

  • Appropriate clinical areas in which acute NIV can be provided, along with the minimum safe level of staff competencies in those areas;
  • Staff-patient ratios for the care of patients requiring acute NIV;
  • Escalation of treatment and step-down care procedures;
  • Standardised documentation;
  • Minimum frequency of clinical review and seniority of the reviewing clinician. Compliance with this policy should be part of each hospital’s annual audit process.

NCEPOD’s findings show there is wide variation in both the organisation of services and the clinical care provided. Overall, the study found that the care of patients was rated less than good in 80% of the cases reviewed, with inadequate clinical care being identified in 34% of cases reviewed and a combination of clinical and organisational care in 27% of cases.

NCEPOD made a total of 21 key recommendations as a result of the study findings to improve the quality of care provided to patients receiving acute NIV, which are summarised in Box 2. Nurses are key to many of these, so the study has raised a number of implications specific to nursing practice:

  • Appropriate physiological monitoring of patients receiving acute NIV is crucial and the use of NEWS is recommended;
  • Ensuring that patients receiving acute NIV are cared for in clinical areas that are equipped to provide continuous oxygen therapy and electrocardiogram monitoring, and have rapid access to the results of blood-gas analysis is key;
  • Well-designed pro formas will greatly enhance the care of patients receiving acute NIV – the examples of a prescription chart and changes to NIV settings chart provided in the appendices of the report will improve the reliability of patient treatment and monitoring;
  • Nursing staff providing care for patients receiving acute NIV must be competent to do so regardless of patient location, in line with the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s (2015) guidance;
  • Minimum staffing levels will always be a challenge for nurses to adhere to in times of austerity but, as previously recommended by the BTS, a minimum staffing ratio of one nurse to two patients receiving acute NIV must be in place. As the data suggests, this is a particularly vulnerable group of patients who are acutely ill – older people and those who are frail.

Hospital managers and staff members should do their best to improve patient care by ensuring that the suggested recommendations are not only put in place, but also adhered to.

Box 2. Summary of recommendations

  1. All hospitals should have a clinical lead for their acute NIV service
  2. Continuous positive airways pressure should be coded separately
  3. Acute NIV should only be provided in clinical areas equipped with continuous pulse oximetry and electrocardiogram monitoring, and rapid access to results of blood gas analysis
  4. Patients with known COPD or other risk factors for hypercapnic respiratory failure should have an oxygen saturation of 88-92% maintained
  5. Treatment with NIV must be started within one hour of identified need
  6. A minimum ratio of one nurse to two acute NIV patients must be maintained
  7. All hospitals where NIV is provided must have an operational policy to guide staff
  8. All staff who prescribe/change NIV treatment must have the required level of competency as stated in their hospital operational policy
  9. All patients treated with NIV must have an escalation plan in place before beginning treatment
  10. All patients treated with acute NIV must be discussed with a specialist competent in its management when treatment is started or as soon as possible after
  11. All patients receiving acute NIV should have, as a minimum, daily consultant review
  12. All patients treated with acute NIV must have their vital signs recorded at least hourly until respiratory acidosis has resolved
  13. All changes to ventilator settings should be documented; use of a standardised pro forma is recommended
  14. Use of acute NIV could act as a flag to consider referral to palliative care services
  15. Following an episode of acute NIV, a structured plan for future treatment should be discussed with the patient and/or carer at the point of discharge or at subsequent follow-up
  16. In the absence of a recognised indication for its use (e.g. COPD), acute NIV should not be considered standard treatment for patients with acute ventilatory failure and evidence of pneumonia
  17. All organisations providing acute NIV should have governance arrangements in place
  18. All acute NIV services should keep records of the number of patients treated
  19. All acute NIV services should be audited annually
  20. All hospitals should monitor their acute NIV mortality rate and quality of acute NIV care; this should be reported at board level
  21. A quality standard for acute NIV is required to facilitate improvement

Source: NCEPOD, 2017

Key points

  • Acute non-invasive ventilation is most commonly used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Ventilation failure is a major factor leading to patient mortality
  • All hospitals should have a protocol or guideline for the provision of non-invasive ventilation
  • Patients receiving non-invasive ventilation must be monitored frequently
  • A standardised pro forma should be used to document all changes to ventilator settings
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.