Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

WHO calls for ban on indoor use of e-cigarettes


Electronic cigarettes should face greater restrictions on their use, sale and promotion, the World Health Organization (WHO) has said.

Although less harmful than real cigarettes, the nicotine vapour inhalers carry a passive smoking risk that mean they should be banned indoors, the United Nations healthcare organisation said.

It also said they were dangerous to children and recommended a clampdown on sales to minors with vending machines removed “in almost all locations”.

There is only “limited” evidence that e-cigarettes help smokers quit, which “does not allow conclusions to be reached”, it added. It called for a ban on marketing them as “smoking cessation aids” without more evidence.

“There is a need for research to understand the health impacts of e-cigarettes on both the user and bystanders”

Ram Moorthy

The British Medical Association welcomed the report, released ahead of October’s WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Moscow. But health charity Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) said it opposed including e-cigarettes in “smoke-free” legislation.

In its report on electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), the WHO said: “The fact that ENDS exhaled aerosol contains on average lower levels of toxicants than the emissions from combusted tobacco does not mean that these levels are acceptable to involuntarily exposed bystanders.

“In fact, exhaled aerosol is likely to increase above background levels the risk of disease to bystanders, especially in the case of some ENDS that produce toxicant levels in the range of that produced by some cigarettes,” it said.

Regarding the claims they help people quit smoking, it added: “Although anecdotal reports indicate that an undetermined proportion of ENDS users have quit smoking using these products, their efficacy has not been systematically evaluated yet.

The one “randomised control trial” that has been carried out found that ENDS were about as effective as nicotine patches, the WHO report said.

Electronic cigarettes are currently regulated as consumer products in the UK, but from 2016 any nicotine-containing products (NCPs) which make medicinal claims – such as claiming they are a stop-smoking aid – will be regulated by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.


Ram Moorthy

Dr Ram Moorthy, deputy chair of the BMA’s board of science committee, said the report was encouraging and that tighter regulation was needed to prevent the “normalisation” of smoking.

He said: “There is a need for research to understand the health impacts of e-cigarettes on both the user and bystanders, and it is vital that the sale of e-cigarettes is appropriately regulated to ensure they are not sold to minors, and are not aggressively marketed to young people as tobacco was in the past.

“Any health claims must be substantiated by robust independent scientific evidence to ensure that the consumer is fully informed regarding potential benefits and risks of e-cigarettes.”

“Although we cannot be sure that electronic cigarettes are completely safe, as the WHO acknowledges, they are considerably less harmful than smoking tobacco”

Hazel Cheeseman

But Ash said that regulation needed to be proportionate. Hazel Cheeseman, its director of policy and research, said there was “no evidence of any harm to bystanders from use of these devices”.

She said: “Smokers who switch to using electronic cigarettes in whole or in part are likely to substantially reduce their health risks.

“Although we cannot be sure that electronic cigarettes are completely safe, as the WHO acknowledges, they are considerably less harmful than smoking tobacco and research suggests that they are already helping smokers to quit,” she said.

“The planned regulatory approach in the UK is consistent with the suggestions made by the WHO and balances risks and opportunities of these products,” said Ms Cheeseman.

She added: “It is hoped that our regulatory regime will promote the development of safer and more effective products while ensuring that electronic cigarettes continue to be widely available to those smokers who want to use them.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “More and more people are using e-cigarettes and we want to make sure they are properly regulated so we can be sure of their safety.

“We have already set out our intention to change the law to ban the sale of e-cigarettes to children under 18,2 she said.

“The UK has an existing licensing system for higher strength products and those that claim to help people quit,” she added.

“We are also bringing in new European rules to cover lower strength products which will ban most advertising, limit nicotine levels and set standards for ingredients, labelling and packaging.”


What do you think of WHO’s recommendations to ban the use of e-cigarettes indoors?

Share your thoughts below or join the live chat at 1pm today (Wednesday 27 August) on twitter - to join in, simply search for #NTtwitchat and use this hashtag in all your tweets


Readers' comments (2)

  • You'll just be driving people out with the cig smokers outside, where they may be easily tempted to slip back into cigarette smoking. Much better to make a clear distinction between smoking and using e-cigs.
    And where does this desire to control other people's behaviour come from in our legislators

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rebecca Kidman

    It is not so much controlling others behaviour I feel but I know that in any circumstances, whether on a ward or out in public, I (and others) don't want to smell any kind of vapour whether that's cigs or e-cigs. In the same way, I wouldn't just rock up to a ward and want to use incense/air fresheners or spray perfume in peoples faces. I do agree however with David, that ecig users will end up outside with the cig smokers. So the question is, how do we tackle that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs