Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Call to cut women's exposure to cancer-risk chemical

  • 2 Comments

“Urgent” action is needed to reduce women’s exposure to cancer-causing chemicals, a charity said.

Breast Cancer UK said there is “compelling” evidence that Bisphenol A (BPA) could be contributing to the rapid increase in the number of women being diagnosed with the disease.

Every year in England there are nearly 42,000 new cases of breast cancer and incidence rates have increased by 90% since 1971, the charity said.

In a new report, it said that low dose exposure to the chemical, which is routinely used in a variety of consumer products including tin cans, plastic food packaging, water bottles and lunch boxes, has been linked to breast cancer and other diseases.

The charity is calling for the hormone-disrupting chemical to be banned from all food and drinks packaging.

The report states: “The European Food Safety Authority… and the UK’s Food Standards Agency claim that BPA is safe, based on their assertion that our exposure to BPA is allegedly low and that humans rapidly eliminate it from the body.

“In reality, it remains unclear exactly how much BPA we as humans are exposed to on a daily basis. Tests reveal that our daily exposure could be as much as eight times more than the so-called ‘safe’ limit.

“In addition to evidence to suggest that BPA could be a causative factor in breast cancer, studies show that it may also be implicated in other health problems such as infertility, obesity, prostate cancer, brain tumours, diabetes, heart disease and neurological and behavioural disorders. Urgent action is needed to reduce human exposure to BPA.”

Lynn Ladbrook, Breast Cancer UK campaigns manager, said: “The government can no longer sweep this sort of overwhelming evidence under the carpet.

“It must acknowledge that our routine exposure to chemicals, like BPA, is a key part of the cancer prevention puzzle, one that is currently missing from its cancer and public health strategies.

“We must redress this gap if we are to begin to help protect the health of future generations.”

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • This is good news, too long have we been forced to endure exposure to such chemicals yet being assured they are safe, when common sense should say otherwise. This needs to go forward and be supported. How many of us are suffering from and dying of cancer because it's cheaper to ignore the warning signs of tests and evidence to the contrary? If we know something is carcinogenic even in small yet unknown quantities alternatives should be found wherever possible. We are exposed to a cocktail of harmful substances no wonder cancer is problem in the Western world!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • other high frequency occurrences of biphosphenol is in recycled paper such as loo paper and the receipts at cash checkouts as well as plastic feeding bottles and food and drinks packaging for babies, toddlers and young children.

    slightly off topic but also of concern is parabens. some claim the quantities used are harmless but then why do some products feel a need to claim they are paraben free. if this is the case what substitutes are they using and could these be equally or more toxic?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.