Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Innovation

Complex medicines management

  • Comment

Patients with one or more long-term conditions often take multiple prescribed medications. A joint approach to drug management improved quality and cut costs

 

In this article…

  • Long-term conditions, polypharmacy and concordance
  • Working with patients to stop, reduce and change medication
  • Improving care while cutting prescription costs

Authors

Ruth Thomas is specialist practice nurse; Carol Kilbey is practice pharmacist; both at NHS Milton Keynes.

 

Abstract

Thomas R, Kilbey C (2010) Complex medicines management. Nursing Times; 107: 8, early online publication.

Patients with long term conditions (LTCs) often take many prescribed drugs. A specialist nurse and pharmacist at a Milton Keynes practice identified the need for a more coordinated medication service for patients with LTCs who take multiple medicines. Adopting a holistic approach, they set up a joint medication management project. This article describes how the one-year project improved quality and safety, reduced out-of-hours presentations and hospital admissions, and cut costs.

Keywords: Long-term conditions, Medication, management, Polypharmacy

  • This article has been double-blind peer reviewed

 

 

5 key points

1.  Patients with one or more long term condition who take multiple medicines benefit from a multidisciplinary holistic approach

2.  Patients should be fully involved to ensure they have realistic and goals

3.  Giving patients time early in the process to express any concerns and fears is critical to a positive outcome

4.  Preparation before medication reviews means the time can be used most effectively

5.  Medication changes should be communicated to everyone involved with the patient’s care, including family and carers. 

 

More than 15 million people in England have one or more long term condition (LTC), and 60% of these are aged 65 and over (Darzi, 2008). Recent government white papers, including Our Health, Our Care, Our Say (Department of Health, 2006) and High Quality Care for All (Darzi, 2008) pledged to improve the safety and quality of care for these people.

High Quality Care for All highlighted the need for “true partnerships” between patients and healthcare professionals, underpinned by care plans and better patient information (Darzi, 2008).

According to the Department of Health, care planning means fewer emergencies and fewer outpatient appointments. More than nine million people in England now have individual care plans, saving the NHS around £1 billion (DH, 2009a).

Zwarenstein et al (2009) found that multidisciplinary approaches can improve care quality and outcomes, while Øvretveit (2009) said that suboptimal care and adverse drug reactions are a huge financial burden to the NHS.

Improved LTC management should therefore result in more effective use of limited resources.

Medication management can be complex for patients with LTCs, with many taking multiple prescribed medications. This project aimed to improve the quality of care for patients receiving multiple prescribed medicines for one or more LTC, using a holistic, evidence-based approach. 

Background

We recognised that some patients with LTCs at a Milton Keynes surgery were accessing healthcare in an erratic manner, with frequent presentations to out-of-hours services. Many were receiving polypharmacy, yet their LTCs were managed in separate clinics focusing on one condition only. Most of the patients did not fit the criteria for referral to a community matron and the surgery served an area of high deprivation.

Polypharmacy has been described as the use of multiple medications, or the administration of more medications than are clinically indicated, representing unnecessary drug use and is considered to be more common among older people (Steinman, 2007).

A small pilot project, over six months during 2007-08, involved multidisciplinary reviews of four patients with complex needs. This was funded and supported by the local prescribing incentive scheme and it reduced unscheduled consultations, prescribing costs and adverse drug effects. The success of the project led to additional funding for from Quality: MK, a local quality improvement programme funded by The Health Foundation (www.qualitymk.nhs.uk).

The project

Forty patients were involved in the one year project which started in 2008. Selection was based on one or more of the following criteria:

  • Frequent visits to the accident and emergency department, or other emergency out- of-hours services, and /or frequent emergency appointments with a GP;
  • One or more long term condition;
  • Four or more prescribed medications;
  • Over use of medication, particularly analgesics;
  • Not meeting community matron or district nurse criteria.

 Aims and objectives

The aim was to provide a joint review of patients’ LTCs and their medication, and set patient-centred goals to ensure optimal management. The objectives were to:

  • Address health inequalities in a deprived area;
  • Identify patients with an LTC who would benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to improving care quality and patient satisfaction;
  • Identify and set specific patient-centered goals, using care planning to improve patient satisfaction, empowerment and engagement, and increase development of self-management skills;
  • Improve the way patients access healthcare and reduce unscheduled consultations and unnecessary hospital admissions;
  • Reduce prescribing costs and risks of adverse effects from polypharmacy.

Outcomes were measured by monitoring out-of-hours (OOH) presentations and hospital admissions, auditing staff costs and prescribing data over the one-year study period, and through patient and carer feedback.

Patient review preparation

Older people are at greater risk of polypharmacy because of the increased likelihood of multiple diseases and increased sensitivity to adverse effects and drug interactions (Sains, 2009).

Preparation before the patient reviews was essential so the consultation could focus on the patient’s needs. A full medication review involving the patient’s GP and pharmacist was carried out. This included reviewing the clinical need for each medication, and continued need for medications with no demonstrable therapeutic benefit; reviewing the side effects of each medication to identify risk factors for adverse drug reactions, and avoid treating side effects with another drug. We also reviewed consultant letters and medical notes and ensured all blood tests and investigations were up to date.

Patient review

Each patient had an hour-long appointment at the surgery with the specialist nurse and the practice pharmacist. Home visits were arranged for those who had difficulty attending the surgery, or if it was felt it would be better to conduct the review in the patient’s home.

The initial consultation included:

  • A full patient history and examination, and appropriate investigations such as blood pressure monitoring;
  • An assessment of patients’ understanding of their long-term condition and medication, including concordance;
  • An assessment of the need for education and support, particularly in developing self-management skills;
  • A discussion about any concerns with medication or barriers to treatment;
  • Identifying and setting realistic goals.

The consultation process allowed patients to discuss their needs and concerns in an informal and unrushed atmosphere. It also enabled them to become actively involved in decision-making and goal-setting.

We explained to each patient that any proposed changes to medication would have to be agreed with their GP. Consultations and any medication changes were documented in patients’ records, which were flagged to show they had participated in the complex patient scheme.

To improve communication between healthcare professionals, the practice pharmacist developed a document linked to patients’ practice medical records which could be accessed by the primary care team. All patients were given a copy of the document and the majority had self-management plans developed in partnership with the nurse and pharmacist.

Results

Positive measurable outcomes were achieved in all 40 multidisciplinary patient reviews.

The project saved more than £24,500 in prescribing costs over the year, and cost just £3,000. Out-of-hours presentations decreased from 95 to just two, and hospital admissions were cut from 43 to two over the year (Table 1).

Five patients were referred to other services, including smoking cessation and haematology, resulting in further medication cost savings.

All patients had changes made to their medication, including dose reductions, stopping medication no longer considered necessary, and changing to more appropriate inhaler devices. Medications such as statins were also switched to more cost-effective formulations where appropriate.

All patients expressed satisfaction with the service, and the open and honest consultation style which allowed for appropriate advice and education. This is illustrated in the case study in Box 1.

Box 1 Case study

Ivy Green had cardiorespiratory disease and reported symptoms of disabling breathlessness, leg oedema and poor mobility which had an impact on her quality of life, requiring frequent unscheduled consultations and an admission to hospital resulting in high dose diuretics. During the consultation she confided she rarely took the diuretics due to problems with incontinence. The review allowed for a large reduction in the dose that was well tolerated by Mrs Green. As a result, her symptoms were well controlled, her mobility and quality of life improved and there was no need for any further out-of-hours or unscheduled consultations.

 

Discussion

All patients said they were satisfied with the review and their care, and had improved knowledge about their LTCs.

The project saved prescribing costs, reduced adverse drug reactions and decreased out-of-hours presentations and hospital admissions. It also improved quality of care and patient satisfaction.

As a nurse and pharmacist our combine knowledge covered combined LTC assessment and management; and pharmacotherapy and drug interactions in older people. This was invaluable in improving patient outcomes.

The same multidisciplinary review framework has been used successfully in two other surgeries in the primary care trust, and Milton Keynes PCT has decided to fund a full-time pharmacist to work with other healthcare professionals in reviewing all patient medications in nursing homes. The community matrons have also reviewed and changed their referral criteria as a result of the project’s outcomes.

Initial concerns from a stakeholder GP about how long the reviews took to conduct were overcome after the GP observed many of the positive outcomes associated with the project.

For the reviews to be successful, patients need to be motivated to change, and to understand how they can benefit from being involved in their own care planning and negotiated goal setting (DH, 2009b). Patients with serious mental health issues and drug or alcohol problems were therefore considered beyond the project scope.

Further limitations of the project included time restraints, and changes in staff. To overcome some of these barriers specific time was allocated to the practice nurse each week, and the pharmacist developed a computer template linked to the patient’s medical records for all surgery staff to access.

Support from PCT stakeholders was enabled by involvement with Quality:MK, which also allowed wider promotion of the work locally. This has led to changes in practice in other surgeries within NHS Milton Keynes.

Conclusion

This project, led by a specialist practice nurse and practice pharmacist, improved the quality of patient care and outcomes.

It reduced overall prescribing and unscheduled consultation costs, and was integrated into other surgeries in the area.

Significant improvements are achievable from a multidisciplinary approach, and all the team felt personal benefit from working in this way. Click here for further information about the project.

 

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs