An extra 530,000 lower paid staff have been spared from making extra pension contributions next year after the Department of Health made a concession in the long-running pensions dispute.
Those earning £26,558 to £48,982 will contribute 1.5 per cent more and those earning £48,983 and more will contribute 2.4 per cent more.
The DH said the number of staff spared the higher contributions would rise from 100,000 to 630,000.
A DH spokeswoman previously told Nursing Times only 100,000 staff would benefit from the announcement.
No details were given about contributions from 2013-14 onwards, which are the subject of ongoing talks.
The DH said the move would prevent a situation where someone earning £60,000 contributed a lower proportion of their salary to their pension after tax relief than someone earning £15,000. This problem had been highlighted by NHS Employers in its consultation response.
Health secretary Andrew Lansley said: “Having listened to staff and stakeholders, we have improved our proposals so that an extra 530,000 NHS staff will not pay any more into their pensions next year.
“Public service pensions will remain among the very best available, providing a guaranteed pension level for all employees – today very few private sector employers still offer this. But people are living longer and pensions are costing taxpayers more and more every year.”
However, he added: “These changes alone will not be enough to ensure that NHS pensions are affordable in the long term.”
Mr Lansley said he still hoped to reach agreement with unions on wider changes to pensions by the end of the year.
The DH announcement came after between 79,000 and 400,000 NHS staff walked out on strike on 30 November.
However, Gail Cartmail, assistant general secretary of the union Unite which has 100,000 NHS members, criticised the government for its “divide and rule” negotiating strategy on public sector pensions.
She said “middle earners”, including health visitors, would still pay more and criticised ministers for “bypassing the agreed negotiating channels”.
“In its haste to sell this as good news, government is also failing to state what it plans for years two and three. It will press on as before, so this is a swindle and a short-lived one at that,” she added.
Royal College of Nursing chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter, said: “This is yet another divisive and provocative move by the government and means that more than two thirds of nurses will now face further increased pensions contributions.
“The truth is these increased contributions will not go into the NHS pension scheme, but will go to the Treasury to help pay off deficits that nurses and healthcare assistants have had no part in creating.”
Unison head of health Christina McAnea said she was “beginning to question” whether ministers were “serious about reaching a deal”.
“We are in the middle of tricky negotiations where the goalposts keep moving and where the timetable looks increasingly unrealistic,” she said.
But NHS Employers director Dean Royles said he hoped the move would “create an environment where we can have substantive discussions on the broader issue of pension reform”.
He said: “Hard choices had to be made and the change ensures that those staff on lower salaries, who provide a significant amount of patient contact, are protected from further costs in the second year of a period of pay restraint.”