Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Jane Ball: 'The Francis inquiry tells us inadequate staffing costs lives'

  • 28 Comments

If anyone needed it, the Francis inquiry provides us with a significant reminder that nurse staffing levels matter, and that inadequate staffing not only damages the quality of care but ultimately leads to loss of life.

If you’ve followed the media coverage over the last few weeks, you might have formed the impression that the inquiry was primarily about how nurses came to treat patients without dignity, that it has been an investigation into abuse and neglect, looking at how the system failed to prevent or detect such neglect. And presented alongside are discussions and opinion pieces: how could nurses be so uncaring? Where has their compassion gone? And how can we change nursing, to ensure only those with compassion enter the profession in the future? And of course, the inevitable anxiety: are nurses “too posh to wash”, “too clever to care”? Do the real problems stem from an educational preparation that is too academic?

We leapfrog the concepts so quickly - bad care, bad nurses, wrong people going into nursing and wrong training. But fortunately, Robert Francis QC does not so summarily try and join the dots. He and his team have provided a detailed and insightful account that offers a carefully observed and intelligent analysis of the problems at Mid Staffordshire, and in the system of which it is a part.

And of course it a complex picture of multiple facets and layers. But there are some strong and recurring messages: a culture where staff dare not speak out; putting targets before patients; inadequate nurse staffing levels; and understanding associated risks to patients - the risks of substandard care and unnecessary death.

Sadly, understaffing is not rare in NHS hospitals. In parts of Australia where minimum staffing levels have been set, acute wards are required by law to have sufficient registered nurses on a day shift to provide a ratio of not more than five patients per registered nurse. The worry with setting such minimums is that they may become the maximum, that employers will stop trying to determine the number of staff needed (using reliable and independently validated tools as Francis suggests) and rely instead on the “just enough” minimum. It may protect from the worse extremes, but might it lead to lower levels being accepted in many hospitals?

These concerns would be entirely valid if we were confident that most hospitals have good levels of nurses on their wards. But the evidence - not just from the one trust on which Francis focused, but from national research data - is that the majority of wards do not have enough nurses on duty. Nine out of 10 nurses on acute wards say they left necessary care undone on the last shift they worked. And why? Because they lacked the time. Out of 31 trusts covered in this study, only three had an average ratio of fewer than six patients per nurse. In this context, far from reducing staffing, setting a limit of five patients per nurse would lead to a widespread increase.

The research linking nurse staffing levels to patient mortality is substantial, and nurses in practice often respond to this with amazement that it even needs doing - is it not obvious? Obvious to us as nurses it may be, but we see around us evidence of this message going unheeded. Nurse staffing levels that fall well below the standards that are deemed “basic” elsewhere mean most patient care is provided not by nurses, but by healthcare assistants. And each time financial pressures increase, it is the nursing workforce that is cut.

That inadequate registered nurse staffing levels costs lives does not appear to be driving policy or practice; in the economic climate, it is a difficult truth to face.

Jane Ball is deputy director at the National Nursing Research Unit, King’s College London

  • 28 Comments

Readers' comments (28)

  • Good article. The evidence from the Francis Report and research does indeed exist.

    "That inadequate registered nurse staffing levels costs lives does not appear to be driving policy or practice; in the economic climate, it is a difficult truth to face."

    That is the crux of the matter. I take the view, and I know that I am in the minority, that the powers that be need to be persuaded. Nurses taking effective and constructive industrial action might focus their attention better on just what should drive policy. But I won't be holding my breath.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Of course there are not enough nurses to look after patients properly, we're tired of saying the same old thing over and over again. There are no set nurse-patient ratios so nothing will change. No-one listens, no-one is ever held accountable.

    Nurses are constantly told to report unsafe staffing levels, when they do no-one does anything about it anyway. If you do report it you get ignored or fobbed off with some excuse about funding, if you don't report it you are accused of 'failing' in your duty.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • mags | 19-Mar-2013 8:24 am
    Agreed. When will nurses learn that simply complaining about staffing levels will never do any good?

    Anonymous | 19-Mar-2013 11:06 am
    Nurses in Oz took to the streets in unified action and targeted strikes and marches. Unless UK nurses are prepared to do the same, then you will still be moaning for many years to come.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 19-Mar-2013 11:06 am

    i'm afraid that they don't have to listen to you when you complain about staffing levels, because there are no compulsory minimum levels with which they must comply. that's the point. Anonymous | 19-Mar-2013 12:34 pm is right. you will continue saying the same old thing over and over again until that changes. i think that it would be better to take action similar to that in australia, than to keep on complaining to people who don't listen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Francis Report merely confirmed what common sense already told us. None of the Francis Report recommendations have been acted upon so what was the point of it.
    Until there are minimum staffing numbers, improved staff-patient ratios, regulation of HCAs, managers being accountable for failings, ward sisters actually looking after patients, staff not being bullied then management, the unions and the govt will get away scot-free and no-one will ever be held accountable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 19-Mar-2013 6:34 pm

    So stop moaning and blaming everyone else and go on strike!! Jeez.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mags, I'd be really interested to know what you think of this
    http://tinyurl.com/d4w8ktt
    I am trying to use the payments we get to directly reflect staffing levels so that in an ideal world, the busier we are/ more dependent patients we have, the more nurses. The time lag is a problem I know.
    I am also trying to use the nursing literature to put in cut offs so that if e.g. staffing drops below what the most senior nurse regards as safe, we shut the ward. The trust refuses to open new beds because of cost and I have little confidence in the CCG plans to manage demand as they've not produced much over the last few years and the trust is just getting busier and busier.
    But I think better use of the tariff might be the key even if this gets a little techie....
    Apologies for management jargon, am just trying to do my bit to help.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anon 10.30 - how do we go on strike? what do we need to do to start strike action and how long does it take to organise. Do we just refuse to go into work and what do we do in the meantime?

    what are the staffing levels like where you work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • if you shut the ward where do the patients who need to be admitted go? we used to shut wards in the 90's but we didn't seem to have so many patients in those days, do ITU's close beds nowadays when they don't have enough staff or do the staff just look after more patients?

    someone has mentioned going on strike, until we do how do we look after patients safely with the staffing and resources we have?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nothing will change until nurses reclaim their power. Yes, they are exhausted, demoralised and intimidated by unsupportive managers BUT it is only they who can do something about it.

    It is imperative that nurses engage differently with each other - break the negative cycle of moaning that pervades the NHS - overtly support each other. If nurses pull together they will have a unified voice that is hard to ignore.

    How do they do this? Dogged determination, committment and courage.

    I don't know if striking is the answer but I do know that it's unlikely to happen while nurses are as disempowered as they currently are.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.