Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Newly qualified nurses must have proper support, says government advisor

  • 5 Comments

A senior government advisor on NHS education and training has spoken of her “concern” at some trusts’ “disinterest” in training and called for newly qualified nurses to be properly supported.

The call comes as evidence shows of a lack of nursing input into the new bodies due to take over control of local education and training budgets for NHS staff.

Dame Julie Moore, chief executive of University of Birmingham Hospitals Foundation Trust, was the lead author of a report on education and training submitted to ministers last week by the NHS Future Forum.

Dame Julie, who has a nursing background, told Nursing Times: “I’m concerned in some areas there’s a lack of interest in training. Education is often seen as a second tier activity compared with research.”

She emphasised her report’s findings that many nurses were not being offered a preceptorship after qualifying, an issue also identified by the Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery in 2010.

Dame Julie said: “A lot of people coming into nursing are young people who need the right support and guidance in the right environment, and to be sure of the standards that are expected. Employers must ensure they provide this.”

She suggested Department of Health plans to hold trusts to account for training budgets would provide a greater “incentive” for them to prioritise it.

But Nursing Times has found nursing leaders are being given little input into the local boards being set up to distribute and monitor £5bn of training money to trusts in future. This is despite the fact that nurses make up around half of the clinical workforce.

Evidence gathered by Nursing Times suggests there will at least 14 Local Education and Training Boards around the country, which will operate in shadow form from April and become fully operational in 2013.

But the shadow board of 14 for the South Central region has no nurses on it and the North East looks set to have a steering group led by trust chief executives, with nurses only present on a secondary “partnership council”. The North West’s three emerging boards will have two nurse directors, while Yorkshire’s shadow board has one nurse but four doctors.

Board papers reveal that the Royal College of Nursing has raised concerns about the situation in the North West.

  • 5 Comments

Readers' comments (5)

  • I believe better support will be given to newly qualified nurses if preceptorship is made mandatory in all NHS Trusts by the NMC.

    When I started work as a newly qualified nurse, I was promised preceptorship by my Trust but did i receive any? No. And to make matters worse, I was functioning in the role of a band 6 within 4 months of starting the job because they were short staffed.

    There was no professional or personal support whatsoever, instead I was forced to work within a role I was not employed or qualified to do and I was still expected to deliver.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "I was forced to work within a role I was not employed or qualified to do and I was still expected to deliver."

    what are the legal implications of this? this must be the responsibility of the employers and for which there must be some recourse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As the above comments not enough staff for proper support. When I first qualified i was thrown in the deep end.


    MOre staff =better support=better care=outcome measures=good pay for everyone

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I qualified in 2008, went straight into Theatre(big mistake). I was promised one to one teaching, which didn't happen, I was working with agency nurses which didn't care whether I learnt the job or not. I was thrown in the deep end for 7 months, I didn't have a clue what I was doing which was dangerous. I pointed this out to surgeons & management and they decided that I was underperforming and after an investigation I was down graded to a band 3. How unfair is that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Training costs time and money, so the bean-counters are always tempted to cut down on it.

    But my instinct here (I could well be wrong about this, and please let me know if I am wrong about it) is that junior doctors are much more intensively trained, and kick up a much louder fuss when their training is being neglected, than junior nurses are/do ?

    Which is either 'nurses are being neglected', or 'nurses are not being assertive enough to press for better nurse training/development' - or possibly both.

    I would like properly trained and competent clinicians, full stop - better for everyone !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.