Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

‘Hospital at home’ deemed safe and effective alternative to admission

  • 1 Comment

Older patients with both acute and long-term conditions can be treated safely and effectively in “hospital at home” style setting that avoid full admission, according to UK researchers.

Their study follows widespread acknowledgement that more treatment is needed in community settings to take the pressure of hospitals.

“Making a decision to admit an older patient can be difficult”

Review report

There has been a 65% increase in hospital admissions in England for those over 75 in the last decade and patients over 85 now account for 11% of emergency admissions and 25% of bed days.

The rise in numbers has been complicated by the fact that, while for some older people the decision to admit is straightforward, for others it is uncertain, noted the review’s authors.

The researchers, from Bristol University and the University of the West of England, reviewed evidence on alternative options to admitting patients aged over 65 to hospital. They looked at 19 studies and eight systematic reviews published between 2010 and 2015.

They concluded that treatment hospital at home, admission to a local community hospital or extended stays and treatment in accident and emergency were a “viable option”.

The researchers looked at mortality and clinical outcomes for patients with conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, heart failure, pulmonary embolism and pneumonia.

They found that, with the exception of stroke, the five alternatives they looked at were safe and could often be more cost-effective than acute hospital care.

In line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance, the needs of stroke patients were found to be best dealt in specialist units, said the researchers.

The five options they assessed were:

  • Interventions initiated by paramedics and other 999 ambulance staff
  • Alternatives delivered in hospital A&E departments
  • Admission to a local community hospital
  • Hospital-type services delivered in the patient’s own home
  • Hospital-type services delivered in a nursing or care home

A report on the findings, published today, said: “Alternative care to hospital at the point of potential acute admission for the population over 65 years is broadly safe with comparable mortality and clinical outcomes for a range of acute and chronic conditions.”

The report authors noted that the majority of studies in the review provided “little or no cost data”, making it difficult to compare acute hospital admission and care at home. In addition, the review did not include either patient or health professional views of alternatives to hospital admissions.

It stated: ”Whilst there is evidence that patients don’t want to go into hospital and prefer to be at home, conversely there is evidence that patients and carers expect an admission to hospital if they are very ill or have a sudden deterioration in their health.

“In terms of health professionals, making a decision to admit an older patient can be difficult,” it said. “This is illustrated by the study populations and the clinical guidelines, which reflect professional experience and are influenced by broader factors such as living conditions and individual/family/carer coping.

University of Bristol

‘Hospital at home’ approach is safe and effective

Sarah Purdy

“If alternatives to acute admission are available for health professionals to refer to they have be confident in these alternative pathways for their patients,” the report noted.

Senior review author Professor Sarah Purdy, associate dean of Bristol’s health sciences faculty, added: “Reducing unnecessary hospital admission and consequent length of stay is one of the biggest challenges currently facing the NHS.

“Our research has helped identify the difficulties of admitting older people appropriately into hospital,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, which itself is funded by the Department of Health in order to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • michael stone

    It would have been troubling, if stroke had not been an exception!

    And re:

    '“In terms of health professionals, making a decision to admit an older patient can be difficult,” it said'

    I bang on - and on, and on, and on - about this. That should say:

    “In terms of health professionals, offering to arrange to admit an older patient can be difficult,” it said.

    It is up to the patient, to decide whether or not to go to hospital - the clinicians offer treatments and options, then the patient [I'm assuming a capacitous patient here - too complex to describe the situation re patients who are lacking mental capacity with any type of brevity] DECIDES WHAT TO ACCEPT. Despite some very clear law, and some very clearly-expressed recent court rulings, it seems this 'clinicians offer and then patients decide' things is taking a while to sink in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.