Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Call for single national emergency services body

  • 1 Comment

A single national body with responsibility for all the emergency services should be set up to ensure effective co-operation in major incidents like the July 7 bombings in London, a report has said.

The report, from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), found that co-ordinated emergency responses by the fire, ambulance and police services are “hampered by the lack of standardised operational procedures”.

Five years on from the 2005 bombings, RUSI found that barriers to joint working exposed during 7/7 had not been removed, despite improvements in the use of technology.

And the report’s author Jennifer Cole identified the complicated structure of the UK’s emergency services as a key issue.

There are 52 regional police services and eight non-geographic forces responsible to the Home Office across the country, while England alone has 46 separate fire and rescue services operating under the Department for Communities and Local Government and 12 NHS ambulance trusts answerable to the Department of Health.

Outside the “blue-light” services, emergencies may require a response from the coastguard - an agency of the Department for Transport, the Environment agency, part of the Department for Food and Rural Affairs, local councils and private utility companies.

“There is a lack of standardisation across geographic and force boundaries, and between different organisations, that affects everything from technology acquisition and operational procedures to budgets, training and exercising, and sharing lessons,” wrote Ms Cole, RUSI’s head of emergency management.

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Not a bad idea, if it is handled correctly. The biggest problem as I see it is that each seperate organisation has vastly different protocols and ways of doing things. This could be solved by a set of protocols covering numerous eventualities (that each service would have anyway) but standardising them so that in the event of an emergency each force would know exactly what to do and what everyone else is doing. The tri service model employed by the military could also be utilised to some extent as a model of how seperate services can integrate well?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.