Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Great Ormond St nurses facing ‘disgraceful tide of hostility’


Nurses and doctors at the famous London hospital embroiled in the Charlie Gard case have faced a “shocking and disgraceful tide of hostility and disturbance”, it was revealed over the weekend.

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust issued a statement on 22 July warning that it would do “everything possible to hold to account” those involved in such “deplorable behaviour”.

“Staff have received abuse both in the street and online”

Mary MacLeod

The trust’s chair, Mary MacLeod, said the organisation understood the high level of public interest and emotions linked to the Charlie Gard case.

The 11-month-old, who has a rare genetic condition called encephalomyopathic mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome that has suffered brain damage, is on life support at Great Ormond Street.

Doctors at the trust believe the life support should be turned off but the child’s parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, want to take him to the US for experimental treatment, resulting in a series of High Court hearings.

It has sparked protests outside the London hospital as well as dividing opion on social media, prompting interventions from high profile figures including the Pope and US president Donald Trump – described as unhelpful by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

In her statement, Ms MacLeod highlighted that the hospital cared for “many thousands of seriously unwell children every year, providing outstanding treatment for those who need it most”.

“Charlie Gard’s case is a heart-breaking one,” she said. “We fully understand that there is intense public interest, and that emotions run high.

“We recognise the tireless advocacy of Charlie’s loving parents and the natural sympathy people feel with his situation,” said Ms MacLeod.

But she argued that, in recent weeks, the trust’s community has been subjected to a “shocking and disgraceful tide of hostility and disturbance”.

“Staff have received abuse both in the street and online,” she said. “Thousands of abusive messages have been sent to doctors and nurses whose life’s work is to care for sick children.”

“Many of these messages are menacing, including death threats. Families have been harassed and discomforted while visiting their children, and we have received complaints of unacceptable behaviour even within the hospital itself,” said Ms MacLeod.

“Whatever the strong emotions raised by this case, there can be no excuse for patients and families to have their privacy and peace disturbed as they deal with their own often very stressful situations or for dedicated doctors and nurses to suffer this kind of abuse,” she said.

“Many of these messages are menacing, including death threats”

Mary MacLeod

She added that the trust was in close contact with the Metropolitan Police and would do “everything possible to hold to account anybody who is involved in this kind of deplorable behaviour”.

The parent of Charlie Gard put out their own statement in response, saying they did not condone any “threatening or abusive remarks” made towards any of the trust’s staff.

They added that they too had received “hurtful comments” from the public surrounding the legal challenge.

The case is due back in court today.


Readers' comments (5)

  • What is wrong with people! It makes me feel really old.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Abuse for staff is not right, especially death threats but it is understandable when this baby MIGHT have improved if treatment abroad had been allowed earlier. It should be the parents choice. No parent would ever subject their child to more suffering, but this child couldnt feel anything and DID have a chance. Medical staff are supposed to support life rather than death and this child HAD a chance, with no cost to NHS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All these persons have to do is refer Great Ormond St nurses to the NMC who will then conduct fitness to practice hearings

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The child did not have a chance. As I understand it, the therapy provided by the American doctor was to children with a different genetic component. The treatment had never been provided to a child with CG's specific makeup; any treatment would have been experimental and afforded a 10% improvement, at best. Whilst I understand and completely sympathise with, the parents torment, criticizing the centre of excellence that has provided 24 hour care for your child is counter productive. In this case, it whipped certain members of the public into an ill informed frenzy. Who would have cared for the child had he lived? With the best will in the world, many parents are unable to offer the 24 hour, 7 day a week, 52 weeks a year complex care that children such as this need and CCG's are cash strapped, with care packages at bare minimum. For the public to issue threats and insults against a body of people who have cared for that child for many months was nothing short of disgraceful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunately Nurse57 people (including nurses apparently who are not associated with the case) would rather read the newspapers than the actual facts. As you state Charlie did not have any chance and the so called 'experimental treatment' had not even been tested on mice so was theoretical only. There was no delay, in fact it was in GOS's interest to get whatever help there was available for Charlie, not only for the humane aspect but the intensive care bed he occupied for so long was no doubt needed desperately for many much loved babies and children who did have a chance of recovery!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs