Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hospitals to replace nursing posts with lower paid assistants


A number of NHS hospitals are planning to replace an increasing number of trained nurses with cheaper, unregistered ‘nurses’ paid at a lower rate.

Leeds Teaching Hospital and East Kent Hospitals University Foundation are among those trusts known to be making or planning such changes.

The chief executive of another hospital trust, who did not want to be named because staff have not yet been informed, said the nurse “swap” was in response to financial pressures and a shortage of experienced band five nurses.

The increased use of electronic monitoring of patients meant it was now possible to replace registered nurses with healthcare assistants, the source added.

A spokesman for Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust told Nursing Times it uses “band four nurses who have reached a higher level of competence and experience who at times fulfil some of the roles previously carried out by band five registered nurses”.

He said: “In these areas we developed the roles primarily as a response to specific recruitment difficulties and the roles are supported by very specific training programmes.”

Foundation chief nurse Hilary Scholefield added: “We have not used band four posts to replace band five registered nurses in order to make financial savings; in fact it is the absolute contrary.

“Band four posts were introduced in our hospitals more than six years ago and this is now a well embedded formal programme of education and training which has enhanced, not detracted from the 70/30 skill mix of our nursing workforce. It has not impacted on the number of registered nurses we have.”

Unison head of nursing Gail Adams said: “This is not like for like work. You can’t swap band four for band five staff. We have seen the effects of these cuts in Mid Staffordshire and Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells. There has been no discussion of this at a national level.”

A spokesman for Leeds Teaching Hospitals said “a major trust-wide organisational development programme with workforce modernisation at its heart” would include “exploring the potential of new roles to support our registered workforce”.

The trust’s Unison branch secretary Sharon Hamilton – herself a band five nurse – said staff had not been informed of any plans to increase the numbers of band four staff. Asked if she agreed electronic patient monitoring meant there was more scope to use lower qualified staff Ms Hamilton said: “It’s OK having a machine that bleeps but if the patient starts changing colour then it’s only a person who can see that.”

Earlier this month a Nursing Times survey revealed many nurses felt the increased use of patient observation technology made it less likely staff would spot signs of patient deterioration (news, page 1, 13 October).

A review of ward staffing levels and skill mix at East Kent, seen by Nursing Times, states nursing’s transition to being an all graduate entry profession by 2012 could mean fewer nurses, but a greater proportion of leadership roles.

It anticipates a “major expansion in the number of people required to work at assistant and associate practitioner role”, which is paid at band four. It describes this role as delivering “protocol-based clinical care that had previously been within the remit of registered professionals”. Meanwhile, a number of band five nurses at the foundation trust will be moved into band six positions, to take on ward management tasks.

Director of NHS Employers Sian Thomas said such changes were “exactly what Agenda for Change” was for and the knowledge and skills framework could be used to measure the skills appropriate for any new role. “The tools are already there to change the career ladder,” she said. “It’s right where we have qualified registered practitioners to have them doing jobs they are qualified to do”

Ms Thomas said responses to the NHS staff survey indicated that up to one in three nurses felt they were doing jobs that were below their knowledge and skill level, suggesting scope for substitution with lower skilled staff.

Royal College of Nursing head of employment relations Josie Irwin said she feared such changes were “financially driven” but she would not object if they were on the basis of a proper evaluation of clinical needs and staff engagement.

Ultimately, the “test” was whether changes to the nursing profession and skill mix made a positive different to patient care, she added.


Readers' comments (70)

  • Good grief, what's new..........? This has been going on for years!
    Trained staff are already on their knees under the weight of taking responsibility for the actions of HCA's. This is a short term solution which in the end will serve to further compromise patient care and safety, and will ultimately lead to more trained staff burning out.
    The DH and the government demand that we reduce the incidence of HCAI's, but how can they expect this to be achieved against a background of dwindling qualified staff?
    Go ahead....who is going to listen to the likes of us, the workforce?

    CT Specialist Nurse, Infection Prevention

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is nothing bew at all, this has been going on for several years now and it is a constant cycle we had the experienced auxiliary nurses who then went on to become enrolled nurses who then through no fault of their own were forced to under go their RN or be forced to work as hca's in some trusts.

    london has been up grading its hca's to band 4 practitioners since 2003 and this has so far work well as the gap between the RN and the hca has become so wide it needed another level of semi trained personal with generic skills to fix it

    this is an excellent use of experienced hca's some who have worked far more many years in health care than some of the RN that are supposed to be supervising them

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am deeply concerned, worried and disappointed about this proposal. Firstly when are the financial management going to absorb the reality that registered nurses are leaving the professional not by the bucket full, but by the thousand full. Lets consider why this may be? I am a nurse and this comment has heightened my desire further to leave this 'profession'. Nurses are in my opinion taken advantage of at all costs, they are already the least paid profession and already have so much responsibility and accountability such as carrying out many medical exams, nurse led clinic, minor surgery such as suturing, discharge planning, many traditional doctors jobs. The role of the nurse is forever extended beyond nursing such as administrative roles, portering duties, cleaning duties, personal secretary roles, nursing auxillary roles, domestic duties, doctors duties, oh yes and nursing duties. All this and beyond. My question is who will be accountable and responsible for the competency of the nursing auxillarys and the adequacy of the care they give? The registered nurses on the ward i assume? Will the registered nurse's have a case load of patient's and added to this need to overlook and ensure all is well from their nursing auxillary colleagues? Who does the accountability lie with? Who does the the legality lie with? Extending upon the latter my question is who will be fulfilling the legal issues of the nursing auxillarys new roles? Legal issues such as documentaion, medication administration, signing of medications, IV drug/fluid administration, recognition of the ill patient/well patient. The clinical judgement of a professional/registered nurse is one of the most important vital signs one may take, and this certainly does not involve technological devices. I do have utmost faith in nursing auxillary's, and they are so valuable in the health service especially in the UK. I believe nursing auxillary's are as important as any other professional in the helath service, but they are not nurses. Why are registered nurses being taken off the wards? I believe this is a process of saving a penny today and losing a pound tomorrow. The patient's are the ones who will suffer the most because they already do not have enough registered and experienced nurses looking after them as it stands, so if more nurses are being removed from caring for patient's i have grave concerns for the health and well-being of the patient's. Penny saving may look most advantageous today, i just hope the financial management who are coming up with money saving schemes have considered the pound that may be taken from them tomorrow in the court room. Registered nurses are the critical essence of patient care for the patient, why oh why are less nurses walking the floor of our wards? It is deeply distressing as a nurse to read this. When will management accept the realism that even though the work force is the highest expenditure within their budget, a patient and someone's loved one are the one's being neglected because of the evermore reduction of bedside nurses. The answer to financial budging should not be form nursing. Nurses are already not paid enough money for the job they do and now they are wanting nursing auxillary's to do the same job for less. Cutting registered nurse's on the ward will not cut it in terms of fincancial savings. The only thing that is being cut is the care provided to patients, and i just hope that patient satisfaction and health will not be cut.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That's right - nothing new here. Nurses to be devalued even further. Makes me wonder why we bother. When the HCA makes an error in judgement they won't be hauled up in front of the NMC!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I concur with all that has been said, however, two points need to be stressed further:
    1) When the 'band 4' makes the error it will still be the band 5 who is hauled before the NMC on a disciplinary etc.!!!

    2) Just think of these so called adjustments in a financial business manner not as a nurse The Heads of the Foundation or Teaching Trusts can give themselves another pay rise or bonus whether they are in the mire or not - this already happens in some areas of the Country at the expense of patient care!!!

    Good luck!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don't get me wrong I love the guys who do this work in my department, bu I work in the ED of one of the above Trusts who are looking to recruit 5 more tech assistants, the initial number were initially employed to venapuncture from existing support workers, which in it's self creates problems for them as some days they are techs and others support workers and people forget which role they are undertaking, the junior doctors become lazy/de-skilled, also it dose not take the pressure off staff nurses as I have to do that patients meds and treatments as well as my own because the tendency is to have 1 support worker to 1 nurse and who is accountable for their actions because i don't have time to observe everything they do, they get mixed response from wards if they escort a patient on transfer because they don't see the split in role, after nearly 20yrs in the health service I feel that instead of addressing the fundamental causes of poor retention, on going training, support etc and in the case of the A/E environment recruiting people who can handle the pressure. The NHS still looks for the cheap and cheerfull approach and ends up regretting it in the long term, remind me why did i do 3 years training and build up a body of experience and knowledge!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am a second year student nurse, this article has made me feel that all the hard work I have had to put in has been a waste of time. Will I even have a job when I qualify or will it have been replaced with a HCA. Ironic really as that is what I was before I started my training, why did I bother.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What ever name you wish to give this valued group of staff they have been around since I commenced my training years ago. So they are not and will not replace nurses. However the role of the 'Registered Nurse has changed consideably over the years and someone is needed to undertake the bedside care of the patient. Who better than a dedicated HCA with training.
    We as a team of Band 6's and Band 4's work together to train and assess Band2's, 3's and 4's.
    We provide a seven day induction programme followed up with further study days within the first six months of employment, Trust competency packages assessed by our team and the ward nurses. They have the opportunity to undertake an NVQ and sit the literacy and numeracy tests from a recognised awarding body.
    Band 3's and 4's have further indepth training and again the opportunity for undertaking an NVQ or foundation degrees.
    As for being unregistered/unregulated is a government issue that has been dragging on for years. The government needs to stop dragging their feet and sort this issue out for all levels of support staff.
    The HCA is working quite closely with the patient and is able to notice whether a patient's condition is changing and report it to the RN for them to take action using their expertese to decide what treatment is required.
    As for accountability everyone is accountable for their actions if accepting the responsibility to undertake a task. However it is the RN who is accountable for delegation to a HCA with the correct level of training to carry out that task andknow what their support staff are capable of.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, maybe we can understand how some doctors feel about us prescribing!
    We are compensating for the lack of GP's, We are after all a lot cheaper to employ, however I agree it is not ethical to let us take the blame when things go wrong, we as prescribers are responsible and accountable for our actions. Whatever happened to the enrolled nurse! She was trained to look after patients for two years and accountable for the care she provided or omitted!
    I work with many HCA, some are ready for an extended role some are not! Train and register them, , make them responsible for the care they provide and pay them accordingly.It is not fair to pile all the responsiblity on to registered nurses as we are extending our role, does anyone cover what we do?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This has been happening in theatres for ages. Band 4 Support Workers scrubbing, sometimes for quite complex cases. In some places, not even the nationally recognised NVQ PCS (add on scrub) standards have been achieved, in favour of an ‘in house’ scheme. Furthermore the NVQ does not give them the underpinning knowledge of the surgery related A&P the RN or ODP has. Why do our Nursing and ODP Schools train so many when for some there is the prospect of not getting a job at the end because their role has been replaced?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.