Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MP criticises privatising blood service


Privatising parts of the National Blood Service could put people off donating as they would see companies profiting from their generosity, an MP said today.

Labour’s Jim Dobbin (Heywood and Middleton) said plans to outsource transportation of blood to companies such as DHL and TNT would compromise the service.

In New Zealand, the number of donations had decreased as a result of privatising its blood service, he said, while hospital infections had jumped in the UK when cleaning contracts were outsourced.

There was also a question mark over whether private companies would be given the right to transport blood in cars using sirens and blue lights.

The service, which takes two million units of blood a year from 1.4 million donors, has already saved by £30 million with the unit cost of blood falling from £140 in 2008/09 to £125 this financial year.

A review into where further savings could be made is about to be published and it is expected to recommend some services are offered to private companies.

During a debate in Westminster Hall today, Health Minister Anne Milton insisted nurses who take blood from the public will continue to work in the public sector.

But Mr Dobbin said there was still a danger people would be put off giving blood if “private companies were allowed to cash in on lucrative government contracts”.

He called on ministers to think again about the plans, adding blood donation was the perfect example of the Big Society in action.

Mr Dobbin said: “In my view privatisation would introduce an element of cost-cutting in order to increase profits. Short-cuts, reduced training and quality reduction would be a strong possibility.

“All I would say really is that the public who donate their services free will be discouraged from taking part if the profit motive is introduced.

“The demand for blood from those who have serious health conditions would not diminish, however the supply of donors is in danger of reduction.”

Have you signed our petition to ensure nurses have a seat on consortia boards? Follow @Aseatontheboard on twitter follow for all the latest campaign news!



Readers' comments (3)

  • Of course quality will suffer. Privatisation changes the primary motivation to one of making money from quality of care and service.
    People matter. How we care for people matters.
    Did anyone see Dispatches re the lie about Big Society actually meaning the transfer of public services not to the people but to the conglomerates such as MERCO and G4S who are mopping up the public sector contracts? Arguing about paying staff the minimum wage whilst awarding themselves millions in wage and bonus!
    It now matters that we speak up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • a very valid point and very risky 'business' for the donors and patients but could be profitable for the companies. what is the value of human lives worth and how it is cared for?

    How will these companies cope in large scale disasters an national emergencies?

    what is the future or organ donation? how will this be managed?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • instead of further fragmenting care by privatisation why can't we improve nationalisation and have a fair and equitable, more cost effective for all. standardisation of quality and service provision seems preferable to privatistion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs