Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Public health 'vision' announced

  • 4 Comments

Andrew Lansley has announced a “whole new approach” to public health in which, he says, the government will shape individuals’ behaviour and choice rather than control supply.

The health secretary, speaking at the UK Faculty of Public Health annual conference today, said: “My vision is for a new public health service which rebalances our approach to health, and draws together a national strategy and leadership, alongside local leadership and delivery and, above-all, a new sense of community and social responsibility.”

He said there would be a “new responsibility deal between government and business built on shared social responsibility and not state regulation”, and a cabinet sub-committee on public health will “tackle the drivers of demand on the NHS”.

Mr Lansley announced a reorganised structure for local public health functions, which are currently based with primary care trusts. He said there would be a ring fenced public health budget and new authority for public heath directors.

Funds will be targeted at areas with the poorest health. Mr Lansley said there would be more detail in a white paper - separate to his proposals for the NHS - later this year.

Notably absent from the announcement was a proposal to rename the Department of Health to the Department of Public Health, as had been proposed by the Conservatives before the election.

It is also unclear whether public health directors will have strengthened links with local authorities.

Mr Lansley said: “For too long our approach to public health has been fragmented, overly complex and sadly ineffective. We want to free the system up – to create a framework which empowers people to make the changes that will really make a difference to the nation’s lives.

“Working with communities and schools to develop young people’s confidence and self-esteem. Seeing diet, exercise and education about drugs, alcohol and smoking not as an end in itself, but as a means to an end, to empower young people to take better decisions when young, so that they enjoy greater health and well-being though life.

“This is why we need genuinely local strategies, based in neighbourhoods and schools. We need to throw off the old ways and start seeing people and families as a whole, using local voluntary and charitable organisations more, cutting across boundaries, encouraging innovation, utilising the power of technology, joining up professions and budgets and putting the people – not the system – at the heart of the strategy.”

He said the system should be “accountable for results, not for processes”.

“We will not be dictating the ‘how’ when it comes to achieving better public health outcomes. But we will be very clear about the ‘what’ – what we want to measure and achieve, such as: increases in life expectancy, decreases in infant mortality and health inequalities, improved immunisation rates, reduced childhood obesity, fewer alcohol related admissions to hospital, and more people taking part in physical activity.”

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • Martin Gray

    The biggest problem to public health iniatives is that many people, especially those on low incomes such as State benefits, do not WANT to change their lifestyles.

    Targets are of no use, as we already know through experience, and measuring true achievement is goung to be extremely difficult if not impossible. Statistics are too easily 'bent' to give the required results!

    Public health should not just be aimed at areas of 'health inequality' as the benefits are supposed to be achievable by everyone, regardless of social standing, colour, race, religeon and sexuality. Most benefit will be gained by middle class Britain as these are the people more likely to actually make the effort needed to change.

    A lot of schools no longer have playing fields as these were sold off. How does the present Government propose to rectify this problem?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Martin Gray

    Alos the work of jamie Oliver to improve school meals was met with such opposition, and abuse in some areas, that I fai to see how these proposed new initiatives will change that attitude. Although Jamie has done some great work and made a big difference in helping many young people achieve their ambition to become chefs he is now being decried for all his work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • George Kuchanny

    Too true Martin,
    Single parent families and others who for many reasons (some admittedly ridiculous) do not feed their children well.

    Questions.
    Is it the child's fault?

    What happens when poor nutrition is the foundation on which a life is built?

    Do we get intensely intelligent motivated productive all round wonderful people or do we get poorly functioning burdensome (to the state and their ill fed mates) misanthropes?

    Regards
    He who Survived on Beans on Toast until He was Seven. Ok so that was a porkie :)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lansley is in dreamland if he thinks that profit-making businesses will act with "social responsibility" without being forced to do so by regulation. They never have and they never will!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.