Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

New shadow health minister attacks axing of student nurse bursary

  • 4 Comments

Labour’s new shadow health secretary, Diane Abbott, has used one of her first statements to attack government plans to replace student nurse bursaries with a system of loans.

She accused the government of creating a recruitment gap by capping the supply of nurses and then announcing an untested policy that will only increase shortages.

“Placing the burden of the cost of education on nurses themselves is plain wrong”

Diane Abbott

The government announced the controversial plans in November, as part of its comprehensive spending review, following lobbying by some in the education sector.

It claimed the move would create up to 10,000 extra training places for student nurses, midwives and allied health professionals by 2020 by freeing up universities to run as many course places as they wanted without being constrained by government funding.

However, unions and other nursing bodies have largely criticised the proposals, arguing that they will be a disincentive to mature students and people from poorer backgrounds.

The government’s consultation on the plans closed last week, prompting a further round of criticism from nursing organisations.

Ms Abbott said the change would create an “open market” that would remove the health service’s ability to place nurses where there was demand.

She described the shift from grants to loans as “regressive”, adding that poorer students were more likely to rely on loans and would, therefore, be more likely to be saddled with debt.

Ms Abbott, speaking in response to a new report on the UK’s nursing labour market, which was published yesterday, said: “Placing the burden of the cost of education on nurses themselves is plain wrong.

“Nurses are the lifeline of our NHS and they shouldn’t have to be saddled with excessive levels of debt to qualify,” she said.

Referencing the dispute over the new contract for junior doctors, Ms Abbott accused ministers of “imposing more unpopular policies on frontline staff”.

“Nurses spend half of their training working in the wards of our hospitals,” she said. “Making them pay for their own education means that they are in effect paying for the privilege to look after the nation’s sick.”

abbott.jpg

Diane Abbott

She added that the current nurse shortage was a “result of the government’s ideological attachment to austerity and is a problem of its own making”.

“The solution is not to lump our nurses with debt but to lift the cap on recruitment,” she said.

However, the government has consistently argued that the move to loans meant students would be able to access around 25% more financial support for their day-to-day costs.

It has also highlighted that around two thirds of people who apply for nursing courses are not currently accepted for training and said the changes would mean more will be able to become nurses.

Ms Abbott was made shadow health secretary by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn at the end of June, in the wake of the mass resignations following the European Union referendum.

The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington replaced Heidi Alexander in the role as lead spokesperson on Labour health policy.

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • Anthony Johnson

    Finally someone says that we're paying to work

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I know! I've been saying this too, and it's the first time I've seen it be acknowledged. The only argument I've seen so far is that they work on the wards and are therefore unable to get a part time job like other undergrads, not really the main issue when you're paying to do the work of a HCA for 50% of the year. We are so opposed to slavery and working without renumeration, what sort of horrible hell is PAYING to do work for free?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Paying to work indeed, but don't forget to add to that when you register you can look forward to pay falling year on year in real terms - scant comfort that student loan payments don't come due till you hit the trigger level of salary. And any student looking to have a family later (and their own home) will certainly need to have way better career prospects than average. I cannot say I would want to be in your position, and I am sure we will be unable to recruit the nurses we need, especially as the proposed arrangement will effectively exclude mature students with families.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aside from all the other very good reasons why this is a bad idea, the suggestion that we could train many more nurses doesn't take into account the lack of suitable placements for them we currently have. How would we did with a sudden massive increase in the numbers of students? The universities may be building big lecture theatres but placements for nurses need to involve mentors. In community we are already expected to take more students than is ideal. We can hardly his mini buses to take them round on visits can we.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.