Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC chair's pay to rise to £78,000 due to expanded remit


The Nursing and Midwifery Council is to increase its chair’s pay to £78,000 next year due to the extra time commitment that will be required by the person in post and wider remit of the role.

From May 2018, when a new chair is appointed, the post holder will be required to work three days a week instead of the current two.

The chair currently receives £48,000 and the regulator’s pay panel said that by boosting this allowance proportionately to account for the extra day – to £72,000 a year – would not be enough to also reflect the wider remit of the role.

The panel also noted the level of pay for the chair had not been altered since 2009, according to NMC council papers that lay out the changes.

Therefore, it proposed a boost in the chair’s allowances, to £78,000 – which represents an 8.5% increase from £72,000.

“The panel was mindful throughout its deliberations of the need to ensure prudent use of registrants’ fees”

NMC council papers

However, the panel had considered whether the payment should be raised up to a maximum of £84,000 – based on the average money provided to similar healthcare regulators’ chairs. But it decided against a larger increase due to the “sensitivity of doing so”.

“The panel was mindful throughout its deliberations of the need to ensure prudent use of registrants’ fees in determining a fair level of allowance,” stated the papers.

After considering the panel’s suggestion of £78,000, the regulator’s remuneration committee noted this was a “no more than a pro rata increase for the three day time commitment” with an “additional, reasonable and not excessive” uplift and agreed to recommend the amount to the NMC council.

The NMC confirmed to Nursing Times that the council had approved the increase to £78,000, which will be introduced from May when a new chair is appointed. The incumbent postholder is Dame Janet Finch, who has been in the role since January 2015.

Earlier this summer, it was revealed that the NMC’s chief executive also received a pay rise in 2016-17.

The regulator’s financial reports, published in July, showed that Jackie Smith’s salary was increased by 10% – equivalent to nearly £20,000 – in order to bring her wages into alignment with leadership roles at other similar organisations.


Readers' comments (6)

  • I think I need to say this in American: are you Kidding me????!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree. This is a joke. Maybe should be performance related in which case 0% pay rise despite extra days. £48k for 2 days??? Seriously????? After the recent bad press questioning the NMCs fitness to regulate, you'd think there would be more sensitivity and discretion shown?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Extended role? Where have i heard that before. Oh yes, it's what we all do and have done for umpty ump years with no pay rise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Utter disgrace.
    We really do need a campaign to start withholding our fees in protest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ikea sell good chairs. I like Ikea.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It appears the NMC needs an exceptional candidate to oversee its functions? A stellar increase in salary to reflect the role this individual will take on to lead an organisation that the profession it seems has no faith in.

    Can we all expect a hike in registration fees very soon , though I expect the reasons given by the NMC will be watered down in other excuses.

    If the profession as a whole feels that the Council is toxic and not fit of purpose then perhaps it is time the Government looks at abolishing it and replacing it with another form of overseers.............................

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.