Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

People with learning disabilities ‘less likely to have care errors picked up’

  • Comment

An investigation into the deaths of people with learning disabilities has revealed they were “less likely” to have mistakes in their care “picked up”.

Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group reviewed all the deaths of people with learning disabilities receiving care commissioned by the CCG between April 2011 and March 2015.

“People with a learning disability were often reliant on their families to co-ordinate care”

CCG report

According to Health Service Journal, the CCG review was carried out in response to recommendations in the 2015 Mazars report into Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust.

It said all deaths of people with mental health or learning disabilities should be investigated if they had received care from Southern Health.

The CCG found people with learning disabilities were no more likely to experience “errors or omissions” in their care, but it was “clear that when they did they were less likely to be picked up”.

The CCG’s report also said the “late identification of health needs was clearly identified” by the review and “sometimes people were not being referred to services when they should have been”.

The CCG put this down to a “lack of care coordination” across multiple agencies – meaning people with a learning disability were often reliant on their families to co-ordinate care – and care staff not having the “right level of skill to support” the person being looked after.

In addition, it found it was “much more difficult” for people without family to receive co-ordinated care and a “number of cases [where] no one held a complete picture” of the patient’s care.

The investigators did not find any next of kin details for 60% of the people whose deaths were investigated. While all identified next of kin were informed by letter about the investigation, a “large number did not reply”.

The CCG also raised concerns about the skills of support workers. Recruiting and retaining the right support workers with the skills to spot and respond to health issues was “extremely challenging”, it said.

The review concluded it was “essential that workforce development is undertaken to support the future of the service for people with a learning disability”.

The review also found there was a “theme of families being seen as a problem”, with some families “fearful of complaining” and others “perceived by services as difficult” when they were trying to support a relative.

Meanwhile, people placed out of area “may receive care of a lesser quality” as they appeared to receive less frequent reviews and it was unclear what responsibility the local council had for assuring the quality of care.

The review found 106 deaths of people with a learning disability occurred during the four years and 40 of those needed further investigation. Of these 40, 60% were of people who had died in hospital and 16 of these had pneumonia listed as a cause of death on their death certificate. Four had epilepsy listed.

After the review finished, one death was referred to the adult safeguarding board and a full safeguarding adult review may still be undertaken.

The CCG has committed to developing a workforce plan to develop a high skilled workforce, put in place enhanced scrutiny of out of area placements, and implement full annual health checks for people with a learning disability. It also said a single multiagency care plan was “essential”.

Meanwhile, Oxfordshire has set up a vulnerable adults mortality subgroup of its adult safeguarding board to review all future deaths of people with a learning disability.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.