Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hospital warned over ‘lack of kindness’ to patients

  • 6 Comments

A South East London hospital has been criticised by inspectors over “instances of poor care” on medial wards and long waits in its accident and emergency department.

The Care Quality Commission has told the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woolwich that it must make improvements to the emergency department and medical care.

“We observed some instances of poor care on the medical wards”

Mike Richards

The regulator rated both as “requires Improvement” following its latest inspection in June, which was sparked by concerns raised by patients and a high number of safeguarding incidents.

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, which is part of Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, provides hospital services for people living in Greenwich, Bexley and other neighbouring boroughs.

During a full inspection in February 2014, the trust was rated as “requires improvement” overall, with the A&E department being rated as “inadequate” and medical care as “requires improvement”.

In June this year, inspectors found some progress had been made in A&E, including an improved pathway to the urgent care centre, opening a clinical decision unit and a frailty assessment unit.

However, inspectors found some aspects of the service had not improved. Rapid assessment and treatment was not being provided for all patients, and vital signs were not always monitored.

Patients were seen being cared for in chairs – and in public corridors – and were experiencing long waiting times in the emergency department, said the CQC’s latest report on the trust.

“Patients who wanted to wash their hair often had to wait considerable lengths of time”

CQC report

The trust had introduced some initiatives to help improve patient flow, including a discharge lounge. However, on the first two days of the inspection, the CQC found the discharge lounge was being used as overflow area for patients who were unwell rather than those who were ready for discharge.

On the medical wards, inspectors observed “some patients being treated with a lack of kindness”, said the CQC. “We were told by patients and staff of some instances of poor personal care being given and support for patients with dementia was limited,” said the inspectors.

Examples cited in the regulator’s report included patients in some areas without access to regular showers and short staffing in some areas resulting in a ”reduction in the ability of staff to meet the personal needs of patients”.

For example, on ward 18 patients who wanted to wash their hair often had to wait considerable lengths of time because there were not enough staff to help them, said the report.

Meanwhile, in the acute medical unit, some patients who were able to use commodes had to wear incontinence pads instead, because staff were too busy to help them. “This had a significant impact on dignity and personal wellbeing,” stated the CQC report.

The inspectors said they also saw a number of staff speak or interact with people in an “unacceptable manner” and some patients told them of a lack of involvement in their care and poor communication from staff, such as not being told why they needed a test.

Mike Richards CQC chief inspector of hospitals

Mike Richards

Mike Richards

Professor Sir Mike Richards, the CQC’s chief hospital inspector, said: “We witnessed long waiting times in the emergency department. The emergency department was full and patients were being cared for in public corridors and transferred to areas that did not meet their needs.

“We observed some instances of poor care on the medical wards,” he said. “The leadership in medical services was variable. Some of the problems we found were not being adequately managed.

“It is disappointing that these shortfalls remain. The trust needs to come back with a plan which addresses these issues in full,” he added.

Queen Elizabeth Hospital provides a full range of adult, elderly and children’s services across medical and surgical disciplines and has just under 500 beds.

In 2015-16 150,219 patients attended the emergency department and in 2015 medical services treated 30,525 patients.

Claire Champion, the trust’s director of nursing and clinical quality, said: “The examples of poor care which are described in the CQC report are not acceptable and I was extremely disappointed when I learned about them.

Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

Hospital warned over ‘lack of kindness’ to patients

Claire Champion

“Since the CQC visit, our senior nursing team and I have worked with our colleagues to address the concerns highlighted in the report,” she said. “We have also strengthened how we monitor standards of inpatient care through our quality ward rounds.

“I have emphasised that I consider it to be gross misconduct and a failure of nursing care for patients to have to wear incontinence pads as staff say they not have time to take them to the toilet, or for patients to have to wait such a long time to get their hair washed,” she said.

She added: “The few examples of poor care cited in the CQC report do not reflect our overall standards as an organisation, or general performance across the trust. As well as noting many cases of good care the CQC report praises the caring attitude of our emergency department staff.”

  • 6 Comments

Readers' comments (6)

  • Making people use continence aids when they were not incontinent is par for the course in my experience...the nurses are doing "nursy" things and theres not enough care assistants to give dignified care

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Basic nursing care and bedside manner is grossly lacking in university training. More interested in fiddling with machines, computers and form filling.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Was my local hospital, far more problems than this. Long waiting lists, Consultant lists closed, repeated cancelled appointments, unanswered emails as specialist dermatology nurse off on long term sick leave and email account not monitored. Moved to tertiary referral centre and QE treatment criticised as old fashioned! My rating would be Inadequate

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No excuses for unkindness ever. I've experienced years of working short staffed but a good ward leader will be able to take an overall view and fit in proper toileting when needed. Huge step back to use pads, total lack of dignity.
    Of course past records show this hospital beset by financial debt of repaying the shareholders of the PFI building insisted on by Blair and Co, add that to present cuts from Hunt and the first to always be cut are frontline staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 2.28pm
    Fifty percent of nurse education is undertaken in the clinical area - that's 2300 hours that student nurses have direct contact with clinical staff. If they fail to witness basic nursing care or the use of appropriate bedside manner in that time, then it is possible that they might end up "grossly lacking" these abilities when they qualify.

    Universities can and do provide students with the theoretical underpinning for practice - including fundamental nursing care and the skills to communicate with those in their care - but basic kindness is something that students and nursing staff have to possess in themselves!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Low staff or not and I have worked with low staff numbers there is no excuse for poor Nursing care. Basic patient care and dignity. I was told when I first started Nursing "treat everyone how you would expect you and yours to be treated and you wont go far wrong" and after over 35 years it is still a mantra I try to work to at all times. The question I would like to ask is would it be acceptable for you or your relative to be deprived of a toilet and use unnecessary incontinence aids? I am sure I will get pilloried for my attitude, this is only an example I have taken from the report, but god help the senior nurse in charge on the ward that allows one of my relatives to be treated this way, low staff numbers and low pay are never an excuse for bad basic nursing care and if you think otherwise then might I suggest you try another occupation. What scares me most is I might be one of those patients someday. Sorry for those who I have upset with my opinions but its the Nurse in me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.