Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What does a nurse do? Can we and should we explain?

  • 3 Comments

So what is nursing? It seems to me that no one can really decide whether nurses should diagnose, prescribe and treat, or observe, provide personal care and assistance to patients and service users.

This week former Royal College of Nursing president Dame June Clark demanded that the college and nurses define nursing urgently.

Her calls for action came in the wake of a court case in Wales, which showed misunderstandings between the local authority and the NHS about the tasks that should be carried out by a nurse.

In order to save money, the NHS health boards were trying to pass some fundamental nursing and personal care duties to cheaper staff, reducing the need for registered nurses.

Dame June, quite rightly, was up in arms. She believes that by allowing others to determine what the profession is and should do, nursing is losing control of its own destiny. I would tend to agree.

She complained that the judge in charge of the case repeatedly asked for a definition of nursing, was told there wasn’t one, and suggested the health boards and local councils sort it out between them.

“Nurses’ more advanced clinical skills and deeper knowledge mean they do far more than task itself.”

Dame June’s belief is that it is the job of the profession, not health boards or local authorities, to define nursing. This has become even more important with the introduction of new roles – such as the nursing associate – which have the potential to confuse the public, and encroach on the domain of the registered nurse.

Concerns have been raised – and compounded by this court case – that such new nursing roles could remove the need for registered nurses to provide fundamental care, such as helping patients with washing, dressing, eating and drinking.

While these may seem ‘easy’or ‘basic’ jobs that could be done by anyone, nurses’ more advanced clinical skills and deeper knowledge mean they do far more than task itself.

These interventions give nurses an opportunity to observe their patients and assess their health and wellbeing. For example, when washing their patients can check the condition of their skin and ensure they are not at risk of pressure damage.

When helping them to dress, they can chat and assess patients’ mental state. And experienced nurses often recognise subtle signs a patient is deteriorating before that patient’s vital signs are altered.

“Washing a patient requires skill and patience… it’s not just giving someone a rub with a flannel.”

The care provided by nurses is not a set of tasks done in isolation, to be ticked off and handed out to any pair of hands. This is a role that takes a holistic view of a complex situation, and nurses can make a huge contribution with every interaction they have with their patients.

I fear that, by trying to make nurses work ‘to the top of licence’, as I have heard many times during the nursing associate debate, we will put patients at risk by denying them access to a crucial set of skills and knowledge.

Nursing care can be provided by a relative or an unregistered healthcare support worker, as well as a nurse.

But what differentiates the care provided by a registered nurse from the care they can provide is the clinical judgement and expertise that will inform decision making about that care. Washing a patient requires skill, patience, an ability to assess, communicate, evaluate and treat – it is not just giving someone a rub with a flannel.

So we should be clear that nursing is a skilled profession, and not a series of tasks that can be offloaded to a cheaper substitute.

 

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • I remember years ago having a long discussion with a social worker about who qualifies for nursing home placement. A very frail patient who had COPD had been accessed as not needing nursing care following completion of assessment form. This lady was dependant on all ADL and the role of the registered nurse in assessment and prevention of the many possible complications was not part of the assessment format being used. When people are assessed as having a list of activities needing completion rather than taking a holistic approach, recognising possible complications and an impact on a persons well being and quality of life we risk frequent readmission to hospital and the increased costs involved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely, by promoting the role of the nurse associate, our own senior nurses are colluding with the above and undermining nurses of band 5 and above.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's the depth and breadth of our knowledge, our intuitiveness (that is based on years of experience), our ability to quickly sum up, analyse information, data, situations and to act quickly in response that we appear to have difficulty in articulating. Our ability to see the breadth of impact on one single episode affecting a patient that comes from knowing our patients deeply and 'intimately' that makes nurses stand out from the crowd.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.