Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NICE finally releases evidence documents for cancelled safe nurse staffing guidance

  • 13 Comments

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence yesterday published four evidence documents on safe nurse staffing levels, which relate to its now cancelled programme of workforce guidance.

The move comes after two NICE non-executive directors decided it was in the public interest for the evidence reviews to be made public – in contrast to a previous decision by NICE chief executive Sir Andrew Dillon.

“The panel considered that the public interest factors were very finely balanced in this case”

NICE non-execs

It is the culmination of a six-month battle by health journalist Shaun Lintern, who regularly contributes to Nursing Times, to get the evidence documents into the public domain.

The documents (see box below) explain assessments of the evidence for safe staffing in accident and emergency, community nursing and inpatient mental health settings. There is also a review of evidence on management approaches to safe staffing.

The reviews would have informed work on developing safe staffing guidelines by NICE, including recommendations by its safe staffing committee for the NHS to follow when setting nurse establishments.

However, as reported by Nursing Times, the committee was disbanded in June last year when NHS England and the government asked NICE to suspend its safe staffing work. The move sparked widespread anger and concern within the nursing profession.

At the time of the suspension, NICE had already published guidance on safe nurse staffing levels in adult general wards and maternity units. It had also completed, but not yet published guidance for A&E units and was in the process of collecting evidence for future guidelines on community services and mental health.

NICE had intended to publish the evidence it had collected for the unpublished guidance in July, but reversed this position after conversations with Kristen McLeod, the health secretary’s principal private secretary.

A subsequent freedom of information request made last year by Nursing Times’ sister title Health Service Journal in order to try and obtain the evidence documents was rejected, along with a request to release the completed A&E guidance itself – which remains unpublished.

At the time, Sir Andrew claimed releasing the evidence reviews would disrupt the “management of the health service” and delay the new regulator NHS Improvement from developing its own safe staffing guidance, which is intended to replace the NICE programme.

But, following an appeal, two NICE non-executives – vice chair Andy McKeon and Professor Finbarr Martin, a consultant at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust – met earlier this month to review the decision.

In his evidence to the non-executives, Sir Andrew said he remained satisfied that publishing the evidence reviews would be likely to “prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs” and lead to “considerable confusion and uncertainty”, which would “impact adversely on those trying to manage NHS services and take decisions about resourcing”.

In their ruling, the two non-executives noted that the ”public interest factors were very finely balanced in this case”.

But overall they said they had “concluded that the public interest in avoiding the likely prejudice identified by Sir Andrew did not outweigh the public interest in disclosure” and ruled, therfore, that ”the materials should now be disclosed”.

The evidence reviews were carried out by NICE as part of its work to develop safe staffing guidelines for the NHS – a key recommendation of the Francis report into failings at the former Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.

The new body NHS Improvement – formed from a merger of Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority – is expected to publish new guidance on safe staffing later this year.

However, it is expected to take a multidisciplinary team approach rather than focus on nursing staff and it will not set a minimum nurses to patients ratio.

  • 13 Comments

Readers' comments (13)

  • michael stone

    Hoorah !!!

    Sanity !!!

    A sign of hope !!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi Shaun I'm very interested in this, could you clarrify when NHS Leaders didn't like the answers, was this at local levels? And when or how long did they know? Yes - I remember June very well and your answer could be very illuminating, but also in respect of certain research papers utilised. Well done Shaun more than you know.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Could genuinely do with this articles links actually working.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please tell me it is coincidence than when I tried to access the evidence documents, I got a 'bad link' message...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Links still not working. Significant development??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, very fishy that the links don't work! Get this fixed & l might take this whole article seriously.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Boys and girls go to Shauns twitter feed and you'll find the links, until NT fixes them on here.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not all of us do Twitter!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Links working perfectly this morning. Thank you for publishing this evidence.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The public interest consideration was "very finely balanced" - really? I dont think current and prospective patients would quite see it like that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.