Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Some trusts 'not doing enough' to tackle agency spending, says regulator

  • 5 Comments

The chief executive of NHS Improvement has issued a stern warning to trusts that “aren’t doing enough” to cut their agency staff spending, as the regulator released new figures on the effect of the agency pay caps.

Jim Mackey made the comments to Nursing Times’ sister title Health Service Journal, ahead of a hearing on the NHS’s finances at the Commons health committee this afternoon.

“There are trusts that simply aren’t doing enough to reduce their spending on agency staff”

Jim Mackey

In a submission to the select committee, NHS Improvement has estimated that the agency spending controls phased in since October 2015 have so far saved the NHS up to £300m.

Prior to the introduction of the agency control measures, the NHS was on course to spend £4bn on agency staff. The new measures means that NHS Improvement now expects the health service to spend a total of £3.7bn on agency staff by the end of the 2015-16 financial year.

The NHS Improvement analysis also said that the adjusted average price paid for a nursing shift has been driven down by 10%.

However, independent analysts have warned that the agency cap policy cannot be properly evaluated without detailed data on areas like staff fill rates, which NHS Improvement has said it does not hold.

The experts argue that this data is necessary to establish whether some trusts are leaving shifts unfilled to avoid breaching agency caps, with corresponding implications for patient safety.

Meanwhile, in recent weeks there have been several cases of trusts complaining that their services have faced staffing shortages because neighbouring providers have been willing to breach the caps.

Jim Mackey

Jim Mackey 25 June 2015 roundtable

Jim Mackey

In a statement issued to HSJ ahead of the committee hearing, Mr Mackey said: “These measures are absolutely crucial. We know this is difficult but there are trusts that simply aren’t doing enough to reduce their spending on agency staff.

“These figures show the significant savings that can be achieved and we have seen many examples of trusts doing really positive things to encourage staff back into full-time or bank roles.

“I want all hospitals to take these measures seriously and to work with us on making meaningful changes to how they approach the issue of agency staffing.”

“This data shows our controls are bearing fruit”

Jeremy Hunt

He added: “We’ve known the scale of the financial challenge facing the NHS for some time and dramatically reducing the amount of money hospitals spend on agency staff is a key part of our plan to balance the books.

“The measures have had a real impact and we are starting to see a significant reduction in the amount of NHS money being paid to these agencies,” he said. “We need to keep up the pressure and make sure the era of overreliance on agency staff comes to an end.”

In a statement, health secretary Jeremy Hunt said: “For too long rip off staffing agencies have been able to charge extortionate rates, but this data shows our controls are bearing fruit.

“This is good news for patients because the savings will be reinvested in frontline patient care and it will also lead to more staff coming back from agencies to permanent roles in the NHS, enabling hospitals to deliver better continuity of care,” he added.

  • 5 Comments

Readers' comments (5)

  • Wonder how much old Jimmy gets paid? So happy to be leaving all this crap

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't think the secretary of state understands. There are no savings. This is a cost avoidance measure rather than a true saving.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am not sure of agency staffing is the solution for staff short wards,Managers need to behave &support the newly joined staff so that the retention of the staff would be the solution for stopping agency staff?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • leaving the wards as they always are vastly understaffed i.e. one hca doing 2 hca jobs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Without the support of appropriate capped agencies (arguably govetnment gone too far with capping) then h&s is effected. This is stupidity by government and NHS Improvement which will result in the NHS having delayed or no staff where relying on very limited bank systems, if any. The agencies aren't the evil ones its NHS Improvement who think it's alright to have no staff after QI initiatives have desimated further permenant numbers. NHS or revitalization won't drive people to work in permanent where management is terrible or it doesn't suit, all it is doing is driving temporary workers towards thriving non cap agencies. There are patterns in history that prove the government approach by lean methodology and pushing staff back to hospitals won't work. NHS malign leaders and government don't want you to know the truth. They are further undermining and dessimating any resource available. The enemy are governments and senior management where existing trying to build dictatorial empires and getting monopolies in their own businesses, based partially on American privitisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.