Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trust decides against nursing pay freeze


A foundation trust that had proposed freezing increases in nurses’ pay has backed down on the plan.

Nursing Times reported in March that Luton and Dunstable Hospital Foundation Trust had predicted £1.5m could be saved by freezing incremental pay rises for staff. It projected a further £1.4m of savings from decreasing annual leave for staff and treating a bank holiday as a working day.

The plans threatened to move away from the nationally agreed Agenda for Change deal under which which nurses’ pay rises in increments to reflect experience.

But the trust has backed down in the face of opposition from unions, including Unison which said the Adenda for Change agreement should not be watered down.

A progress report on the hospital’s quality, innovation, productivity and prevention (QIPP) plan, released to Nursing Times under the freedom of information act, said it had realised some issues could not be “negotiated in isolation”. It said: “We now have less confidence that incremental and threshold freezes will be accepted by the main unions nationally.”

It said the reversal posed “a significant threat” to the trust’s plan to save £2m from workforce reforms.  The trust’s QIPP team have now “redirected some of their energies to focus on understanding and controlling the medical and nursing agency spend which is on track to exceed £7m for 2010-11”, it said.

A spokesman for the trust said it had been able to make the savings elsewhere and was on target to meet its savings targets.

The change of heart came before the Royal College of Nursing Congress voted in April in favour of a ballot on industrial action if the national pay agreement is challenged.

Foundation Trust Network director Sue Slipman told Nursing Times with trusts having to make large savings, workforce reforms “have to be an option”.

She said: “The less flexible the pay bill is the more that will impact on jobs. Not restricting the pay bill – which accounts for around 60 per cent of trust’s budgets  – will only lead to job losses later on.

“Everybody faces the QIPP challenge to do more with less, this is not a management problem, this is a problem for everybody.”

The trust’s spokesman said staff had been willing to negotiate, but a local Unison representative said the union was not willing to move away from Agenda for Change.


Readers' comments (4)

  • Backed down? Crapped themselves when they realised they couldn't win, you mean.

    It's nice to hear the unions are actually doing something for a change.

    If 'Foundation Trust Network director' Sue Slipman wants to save money on a few jobs, why not ask how much she and the rest of the non jobs like her are on and start there? Don't think they'll be as happy about that idea.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Staff in the NHS still have a raw deal though because we mustn't forget that the unions agreed last year to freezing our pay increases (annual pay increase recommended by the pay review body not incremental pay), meaning that anyone at the top of their increment doesn't get a pay rise for at least 2 years. I, for one, am already feeling the effect of this as the cost of living continues to rise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Exactly Gary! We are already getting crapped on, and they want to make things worse? It's an absolute joke!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • how about sue slipman and the rest of her cronies taking a pay cut, like mike said

    why is it they always target the low paid its a disgrace

    at least this time FOR NOW the unions have told the trust to shuve it!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs