Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Safeguarding scheme to be 'scaled back'


Home secretary Theresa May has promised to scale back “draconian” plans for vetting people working with children and vulnerable adults to bring in more “common sense”.

She said present plans unveiled by the last Labour government risked alienating volunteers doing valuable work, and they would now be put on hold while a new scheme was worked out.

The announcement comes as a landmark date approaches when all newcomers to regulated posts can register with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA).

From 26 July all new entrants to regulated activity or those changing jobs would have been able to sign up, although it was not due to become mandatory until 1 November.

The ISA scheme was developed in response to the murder of two schoolgirls by caretaker Ian Huntley and launched last October.

It was designed to prevent unsuitable people working with children and vulnerable adults, and employers would face prosecution for breaches.

An independent review of the scheme took place last year following complaints that volunteers were being discouraged.

As a result ministers agreed to only vet adults if they see the same group of children or vulnerable people once a week or more, rather than once a month.

But Ms May told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “It was a draconian measure when it was introduced, that’s why we have halted the process.

“By scaling it back we will be able to introduce a greater element of common sense.”

Last week the Royal College of Nursing said it was seeking a judicial review of the scheme, claiming it could breach the human rights of nurses and undermine their work


Readers' comments (3)

  • I am appealing against a judgement that meant my name was added to the POCA and POVA sections on a CRB check without my knowledge of any complaint or incident. I have had difficulty in gaining Legal Representation as this comes under Public Law and many solicitors do not deal with this and there is no information on Legal Aid.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a manager, I am so pleased to see someone mentioning the words 'common sense', applied to the ISA scheme. I know of staff who would/will loose their jobs and livlihood through it, because of very- in- the- past offences. People do reform and some are innocent, but their label follows them!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi Peter,

    If you were not informed or involved then that is clearly wrong. It also goes against the stated processes of the ISA.

    Then again POCA and POVA predate the ISA and the Vetting & Barring List so maybe that's where the trouble lay.

    Either way - I for one (although I support safeguarding schemes in general) think that that is not only appaling but also contrary to the system that is laid out in law.



    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.