Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Service takeovers give staff 'nasty surprises'


Nurses have been advised to be “proactive” during takeovers of NHS services or risk seeing jobs lost or downgraded and the quality of services fall.

The warning came from the Royal College of Nursing in the north of England where nurses had experienced “nasty surprises” when transferring to private providers, according to regional officer Jake Turnbull.

Problems had occurred despite transfer of undertakings (protection of employment) (TUPE) rules designed to protect staff in such situations, he said.

The union said staff were hit when an out-of-hours service in North Tees and Hartlepool was taken over in April by the firm Northern Doctors Urgent Care. 

The take-over led to two nurse consultants resigning, claiming they “were downgraded to practice nurse roles” and were no longer allowed to diagnose, triage and prescribe alone, according to the RCN.

“The doctors said they would not work with nurse consultants,” said fellow RCN officer Sandra Bullock. “After [Northern Doctors] won the tender, they said the roles for certain staff would be completely different.”

Elsewhere in the region, Care UK placed around 20 per cent of the workforce in a prison health care service in the north east at risk of redundancy a week after winning a contract. Following pressure from campaigners including the RCN the firm announced there would be no compulsory redundancies.

Mr Turnbull said the union had successfully gained assurances from local primary care trusts that “quality not price” would drive successful bids to run services in future. But he warned nurses had “got to be proactive”, using tools like the Freedom of Information Act and “stern” correspondence with managers to obtain information about contracts.

“Otherwise, you’re at the mercy of how much they are prepared to share with you,” he said.

A spokeswoman for Northern Doctors Urgent Care said the company could not comment on individual cases, but added: “The new contract stated that patients were required to be provided with care by qualified GPs and a full consultation programme was undertaken with all parties under the TUPE.”


Readers' comments (23)

  • welcome to your new tory nhs!
    god help us all!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • there is nothing more demotivating than being downgraded or forced into a role you have not been trained for and have no interest in without being offered a choice, or further training for the new role. what is the point of spending years training and much at one's own expense if these skills and experience can no longer be put to use? Such coercion and manipulation is inhumane and possibly illegal and against the human right of freedom of choice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And this is a surprise to anyone? We shouldn't have to be proactive, the RCN should be getting off their arses and being proactive on our collective behalf to stop this happening in the first place! Put the ballot out for a strike you wasters!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The only surprise Mike, is that it is called a 'surprise'. Privatisation of the NHS has been on the Tory cards for decades, and reading your comments over the weeks on several of the articles published here, I have to stand by all of what you have said.
    I have been emailing my local MP via another proactive group about the NHS Reform bill due to be heard tofay AND the pensions fiasco. The only problem with emailing the local MP is that he is currently encumbent in No 10 :(

    I think the RCN and other bodies need to stop pussy footing around on all of these issues, and demand it stops now for nursing, secure our roles, grades pensions etc, or walk.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I empathise with North Tees and Hartlepool entirely through my own experience. TUPE 'protection' is very limited despite what it was designed to actually do. These new providers are desperate to be in absolute control, desperate to out-compete anyone else and desperate to look good, and act accordingly as desperate people do. This is nothing even in the vicinity of collaboration and the lack of transparency or close inspection means the accountability is arbitrary, despite the commissioning being subject to PCT terms and conditions.
    This is not modern Britain, it is feudal and medieval, and exactly what the tory ethos is based on, inequality on all levels.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Forget pensions, forget increment and pay freezes: this is the single biggest risk to your future! I’ve been warning colleagues for sometime on these boards about what the future holds.

    I actually work in one of the prisons in the north east group and was TUPE’d from the NHS over to Care UK and words cannot describe what an unpleasant and demoralising experience the last five or so months have been. Care UK have absolutely annihilated the service and staff are leaving on a weekly basis.

    How this Jake Turnbull dares to take any credit for there being no compulsory redundancies is beyond me. The RCN and Unison were absolutely useless: I’d attend meetings and only realised that the RCN or Unison had been present once I’d receiving the minutes as they never opened their mouths. When staff had to be interviewed to see if they could keep their job or not our local RCN Rep was too busy to attend as she wasn‘t given enough notice. The one and only time you need your union and they’re not there. Many of us have cancelled our union subs.

    Basically we were ditched by the NHS, with no prospects of being redeployed - sold to the lowest bidder!

    I know what many of you will be thinking this wont affect me, the reality is it might not be this year or next year, but its coming. You have been warned!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This should be no surprise to anyone. Of course when private firms take over a service (or hospital) they will want to do things their way!!!

    However, the biggest surprise is likely to be ones pension. There will be no guarantees that once working for a private company your NHS pension is safe. You might have TUPE initially, but give it a little time and all ones dreams will be unravelled. All this concern about pensions and having to pay more and get less in return might be purely academic in a few years time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 6-Sep-2011 3:19 pm, I would just add that it is not just 'Tory led', as Labour were just as bad, they just weren't as overt about it.

    I have also contacted my local MP, who (for all her faults) has actually replied, stating (and I quote) ''I can assure you I will be voting to scrap or significantly amend this reckless, beauracratic and wasteful reorganisation of the NHS''. I was actually shocked as this was the first time I had agreed with the woman on anything. I have also emailed and supported other proactive groups too.

    It just makes me bloody infuriated that the only people who SHOULD be doing something, the unions, are once again doing absolutely piss all apart from coming out with a lot of hot air.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mike 6-Sep-2011 1:50 pm

    'We shouldn't have to be proactive, the RCN should be getting off their arses and being proactive on our collective behalf.

    I don't agree, we should be proactive' I can't believe you have this view

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 7-Sep-2011 0:26 am you kind of missed my point, but to be fair maybe I didn't express it very well.

    As many of my numerous posts on similar issues will attest, I am a big believer in strong and decisive action. Of course we should be proactive.

    My point was that our unions should be so strong and so proactive on our behalf that we wouldn't HAVE to be. Why are we being proactive whilst are unions are sitting on their arses doing nothing? If we had a half decent union, they would be so proactive that we wouldn't be facing all the problems that we are now!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs