Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Staff shortages spark CQC warning for mental health trust

  • 5 Comments

North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust has been given an official warning about community mental health services for young people, after inspectors found there were not enough staff to provide quality care.

The trust’s child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) community provision was rated “inadequate” by the Care Quality Commission following an inspection of all core services in September last year.

“There was a perception among nurses that they are not valued”

CQC report

Inspectors found staffing levels in community CAMHS were “not safe” because of staffing shortages in various disciplines, including nursing, with “excessively long” waits for treatment.

“There were not enough consultant psychiatrists, nurses, psychologists, or therapists,” said the CQC report. “We found staff on maternity or long-term sick leave were not replaced by temporary staff.”

Inspectors also found risk assessments of young clients were not always completed or safety plans put in place.

Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety were also rated “inadequate” by the CQC, because of concerns about risk management and record-keeping.

Overall, the trust was rated “requires improvement”, with inspectors concluding that it was “good” when it came to caring.

However, the CQC’s report highlighted dissatisfaction among some nursing staff when it came to feeling valued.

“There was a perception among nurses that they are not valued, especially among learning disability nursing staff,” said the report, which highlighted a high turnover rate of 27% in learning disability services.

Even so, learning disability services were rated “good” and inspectors said community learning disability services were “outstanding”.

A key issue flagged up in the report was inconsistency in nursing leadership, with five different nursing directors in the past three years.

“This has had an effect on stability and the trust’s ability to effectively monitor quality and safety,” said the report.

The constant changes in the role prevented nurses having a strong say when it came to planning and redesigning services, the report stated.

North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust

Staff shortages spark warning for mental health trust

Maria Nelligan

Maria Nelligan was appointed director of nursing and quality in October last year.

“Since October 2015, Maria has been in the director of nursing and quality post on a substantive basis and has played an important role in the improvements we have made to our services since the CQC inspection six months ago,” said a trust spokesman.

Inspectors also flagged up areas of good practice at the trust, including a pilot scheme to monitor staff stress levels during shifts.

Staff place a green or red token in a box at the end of a shift to indicate how stressful it was. They are then contacted individually and offered support where needed.

“Staff said that it was useful way to reflect upon how individual shifts impacted on stress levels,” said the CQC report.

Other examples of good practice include a service developed by the hearing loss specialist nurse to ensure patients with hearing difficulties had their needs met.

“They had secured ipads and online apps, which provided instant access to signers,” said the report. “Patients experiencing hearing loss would then have access to this service on admission throughout the trust.”

“We have made good progress since September, in particular in improving our CAHMS community services”

Caroline Donovan

Trust managers said the organisation had made considerable progress since the inspection, which included efforts to address staffing and recruitment issues and improvements in mental health crisis services.

The trust had secured more funding from commissioners to recruit more clinical staff in community CAHMS and a recent external audit of the service gave it a “green” rating, it said in a statement.

“We have made good progress since September, in particular in improving our CAHMS community services, which has been supported by significant investment from the CCG,” said chief executive Caroline Donovan.

“The CQC also recognised our direction of travel is positive. While we are in no way complacent, we are confident that by addressing the recommendations of the inspection team and continuing to work with our commissioners, staff and service users, we will continue to improve,” she said.

  • 5 Comments

Readers' comments (5)

  • These senior managers want to be leaders then get off your backsides and lead from the front - no more time for procastination to what you think it leadership, show your worth as a nurse. What are leaders without staff or staff leaving in high numbers?

    The answer is easy it is delusional.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This could be replicated in many areas of the country.

    I worked for many years in community CAMHS: we never met NSF recommended staffing levels; mat leave was never covered; long term sickness (which was predominantly work-related stress and depression) was never covered; we were always down at least one consultant psychiatrist, which meant we lost junior medics also, and psychologists...

    And then it got worse: in 2011 - oddly just after the coalition started messing around with the money available, y'know "efficiency savings" of up to 20% of clinical budgets - there was a "re-structuring" which removed most of the senior clinical nursing staff, who have not been replaced...

    The red and green button thing mentioned in the article is just laughable: I would not have thanked my trust for contacting me personally to "offer support" as we spent more than enough time telling our managers that there were not enough staff which is why people were stressed. If there is no intention to sort out adequate, let alone good, staffing levels, then this sort of "initiative" is useless, patronising nonsense of the most cynical sort.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh and the supposed inconsistency in nursing leadership and changes in the director of nursing is a red herring: those posts are completely irrelevant to sharp end nurses and IME DoNs just rubber stamp whatever the CE tells them to and trouser the huuuuuuge off scale salaries.

    As a Band 7 I had no contact with an no support from the senior nursing structure in my trust: we would invite the DoN or his minions to come to our nurses' meetings to assist us on contentious professional issues - y'know, what with them being our chain of professional accountability - but we were lucky if we even got an acknowledgment our our - very polite - requests.

    "Nursing leadership" is verging on oxymoronic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But it is a point to point and linguistically smoke these alleged leaders out - these hidden localised puppet masters of a bygone age. Youre right they pocket money for doing very little. Hopefully all these cutting the fat approaches will catch up with them. Now that's a job I would love - send me in with government backing and watch the sparks fly. I would call myself the 'NHS Management Catcher' - yummy

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is the real issue in part too many dodgy chiefs' not supporting the front, with too much money to be dislodged from power easily. The only answer to that is specific legislation preventing those at the top from using legal support to defend against the obvious, where there are myriad cases presenting. We need a CQC whistleblowing guardian that is protected and can put the fear of God into trust management, regulators and government. Without any of this the situation just gets worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.