Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trust holds back pay rise from lowest band staff

  • 17 Comments

Southend University Hospital Foundation Trust has held back a £250 pay rise for low paid staff in a plan to save over £400,000.

While most NHS staff salaries are frozen, national negotiators had agreed that those earning less than £21,000 a year would receive a £250 pay rise.

But Southend foundation trust is not part of the national Agenda for Change agreement, so is able to negotiate staff pay locally and has opted not to pass on the pay rise for the lowest grades.

It is the only foundation trust to have so far used its right to opt out of Agenda for Change through staff ballot. Previously it has usually followed closely, or even bettered, national pay awards.

However, as part of £9.1m of “non-recurring” savings to be made this year, documents submitted by Southend to the foundation trust regulator Monitor said £412,000 would be saved from “not funding pay award”. It is thought the move will affect more than 1,600 staff including healthcare assistants.

The move appears to confirm fears previously raised by unions about the dangers of allowing trusts to break away from Agenda for Change.

Royal College of Nursing officer for Essex Mike Kavanagh said: “They are refusing to give what is a very small raise to the lowest paid staff. It is asking the lowest paid staff to subsidise the service, that’s completely wrong.”

The trust has acknowledged that its decision could impact on the recruitment and retention of staff.

Trust documents state: “Decisions [about staff pay and conditions] made locally could impact on recruitment and retention if the actions that the trust takes appear to disadvantage staff to a greater extent than national pay settlements”.

A spokeswoman for the trust said: “The year’s pay increments were fully funded and paid to staff. Following extensive consultation with staff and staffside unions the Trust did not pay the inflation increase so as to minimise the need for redundancies arising from financial pressures.  

“Under Southend’s local terms and conditions, staff receive a ‘Gainshare’ annual reward if annual performance and quality targets are met, which is not paid to very senior managers. Staff received this unique payment this year as they did in previous years. 95 per cent of staff voted to be employed under the Trust’s local terms and conditions.”

  • 17 Comments

Readers' comments (17)

  • "The trust has acknowledged that its decision could impact on the recruitment and retention of staff."

    Oh well that's good of it. Here's an idea, just stop paying all of the staff at all, see how long you actually have functioning hospitals?

    Pillocks.

    It is about time the raid on ALL our pay is stopped completely and reversed, so that we all get the pay that we not only deserve, but have EARNED.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • totally agree with mike

    what a bunch of idiots...how about the chief exec and the band 9 and 8's taking a pay cut...no that would mean them having less fancy cars and holidays..we carnt have that can we!!!

    instead its the very lowest paid that get the good old kick in the ******yet again time and time again

    hope the ce and top managers can sleep soundly at night...oh they probably can and dont care a jot!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Disgusting!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The article says:

    "It is the only foundation trust to have so far used its right to opt out of Agenda for Change through staff ballot."

    Does this mean staff were balloted and gave up their right to the payrise?

    If not, why are they not on strike?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely the wrong thing to do. The lower paid are bearing the brunt of the wrongs committed by the better off.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    james wishart | 19-Aug-2011 12:26 pm

    Absolutely, in a nutshell. Shame on them!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NOT FAIR....... Cut or stop pay rises for band 8-9 and above.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I fear it will get a whole lot worse soon ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Read the article..................95% of staff voted to be employed on the Trust's terms and conditions (rather than remain on AfC) and increments have been paid in full. After previously bettering AfC pay rises they are now trimming. How many posters complained when they were being paid more than those on AfC T&Cs? Swings and roundabouts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 19-Aug-2011 4:55 pm

    I have to agree with you. The staff made the choice, and now there are negative consequences. That's life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.