Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Unpublished regional plans forecast NHS will employ thousands fewer nurses


The NHS’s unpublished proposals for dealing with extreme funding pressure suggest it will employ thousands fewer nurses and other staff in the next few years, and treat tens of thousands fewer emergency patients in hospital.

The findings are based on the detailed finance, workforce and efficiency plans submitted as part of the sustainability and transformation plan (STP) process.

“We know that patient care suffers without the right number of nurses”

Tom Sandford

They have not been published, but Nursing Times’ sister title Health Service Journal has analysed a sample covering a quarter of the 44 STPs, shared on the basis that they are not identified. They include more than one from each of the NHS’s four regions and a mix of rural and urban areas.

The trends they propose would require the health service to buck the established patterns of recent years, in which both emergency activity and the NHS workforce have increased.

National officials have distanced themselves from some of the forecasts, with NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens saying last week: “It is certain that we are going to need more qualified nurses in the National Health Service in five years’ time than now.”

In total, the 11 STPs forecast a 1.6% reduction in whole-time equivalent staff between 2016-17 and 2020-21, with a 2.3% reduction in registered nurse posts. If this is applied across England, it indicates reductions of 17,300 staff overall and 7,300 across nursing, midwifery and health visiting.

However, there is variation between the 11 STPs. Five plan reductions in total staff, while four envisage it remaining more or less static, and two propose growth of more than 5% by 2020-21.

Responding to the findings, NHS England has indicated this might be mitigated by more registered nurses working in GP practices, but this detail is not included in the STP templates. The plans are for whole-time equivalent posts, so account for both substantive and agency staff.

Last year, in response to indications that STPs might include reductions in nursing posts, health secretary Jeremy Hunt said : “I don’t want to be rigid or inflexible about new roles, but if you ask me whether it is likely that local areas are going to be able to reduce the number of trained nurses, I would be very surprised if any actually managed that.”

STPs were developed by local NHS leaders last year. Full plans and templates were submitted to NHS England at the end of October. They are intended to set out how the NHS would manage within historically low funding growth in the next few years, while trying to maintain standards.

The STPs examined by Health Service Journal also envisage small reductions in the number of doctors. The only staff groups that would see significant growth under the plans are GPs and non-GPs working in general practice, referred to as “GP support” (see table below).

The STPs envisage a substantial acceleration of the growth in these groups with thousands of new posts – reflecting the widespread aim of expanding primary care. At present about 15% of ”GP support” posts are nurses, and it is unclear how much this might compensate for nurse reductions elsewhere.

The biggest cut proportionately is to “infrastructure support”, which mainly includes staff working on functions such as personnel, finance, IT and estates, and also includes managers.

In total these STPs envisage this group being cut by 5.2% between 2016-17 and 2020-21 – which would equate to about 9,700 posts across England. This staff group, though it fell at the beginning of the decade, has been rising since 2013-14.

The chart below shows the proportionate change in whole-time equivalent staff in total and in the “registered nursing, midwifery and health visitor” group, which is dominated by nursing, showing both the actual recorded change (from 2010-11 to 2015-16) and the change forecast/planned in the sample of STPs (from 2016-17 onwards):



This chart shows the same for all workforce groups – click on a group line or name to remove or add it:


The table shows the planned percentage change each year in total across the 11 STPs for each workforce group:

 Staff group2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-21Change from 2016-17 to 2020-21
GP support staff 0.7% 4.5% 1.8% 4.6% 3.6% 15.27%
GP 0.8% 3.9% 1.7% 4.6% 3.0% 13.84%
Qualified ambulance service staff 2.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 3.19%
Medical and dental 1.0% -1.1% -0.8% -0.7% 1.8% -0.82%
Support to clinical staff, including healthcare assistants 1.4% -0.7% -0.5% -0.4% -0.1% -1.60%
Registered nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff 1.2% -0.8% -0.6% -0.5% -0.4% -2.30%
Scientific, therapeutic and technical staff 1.6% -2.3% 0.4% -0.8% -0.4% -2.98%
Commissioner administration staff 1.1% -0.2% -1.5% -1.9% -0.4% -3.94%
Infrastructure support 0.9% -1.7% -1.4% -1.3% -0.9% -5.15%
Total 1.2% -0.8% -0.6% -0.2% 0.0% -1.56%

An NHS England spokeswoman said reviewing “all STP returns” showed “the number of qualified nurses in hospitals, community services and primary care” would “go up by 2020-21”.

Jane Cummings, Chief Nursing Officer for England

Jane Cummings, Chief Nursing Officer for England

Jane Cummings

This may assume more registered nurse posts in GP practices, which is not detailed in the templates but may be included in the ”GP support staff” line. NHS England has declined to provide its own figures.

“We are confident that a growing NHS will see more qualified nurses employed across England,” the spokeswoman said.

Meanwhile, chief nursing officer for England Jane Cummings used the social media site Twitter to state that both she and NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens “agree more nurses are needed”, adding that a “sample of draft workforce plans aren’t the final position”.

She quoted comments made last week by Mr Stevens to the Commons public accounts committee, in which he said: “I think it is certain that we are going to need more qualified nurses in the national health service in five years’ time than now”.

Tom Sandford

Tom Sandford

Tom Sandford

Tom Sandford, the Royal College of Nursing’s director of England, said: “There are already 24,000 vacant nursing posts across the UK. If these estimates are even close to accurate, the implications for patient safety are truly frightening. We know that patient care suffers without the right number of nurses.

“The nursing workforce has taken one blow after another – under-staffing, impossible caseloads, poor pay and being forced to make life and death decisions in hospital corridors,” he said.

“The importance of having enough skilled nurses cannot be overstated. Nurses are the backbone of the NHS and the future of the health service depends on them,” he added. “We must attract more people into the profession and the government must invest in nursing across all areas.”


Readers' comments (3)

  • I would be interested to know how they arrived at the conclusion they will treat less emergency patients in the future, when we have seen that they have actually been treating more recently. However I might have an insight into how that is going to work, they will prohibit ambulances from transporting anyone over the age of 65 to an A&E department. Why do I think that; look at the way the elderly are blamed for every ill the NHS is suffering. Let us not forget that most have worked all their lives and paid for our NHS, and quite apart from what the press would have us believe, not all elderly people spend their lives going on cruises and counting their savings!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I too would like to know how the conclusion mentioned in the above comment, was reached. Of course it would be nice to think that there will BE less emergency patients in future! Thanks to 'Anonymous' above for acknowledging that the elderly seem to be being 'blamed' for the present state of the NHS. I hope very much that I can stay healthy and well (no cruises though!) and not add to problems in the NHS. (Retired former NHS nurse)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC are doing a very good job at reducing the number of trained nurses in the system. It seems to be at the rate of about 4000 a year. Many of the allegations are unfounded, malicious, vindictive or twisted referrals. NMC dont investigate
    The nurses who go through the NMC torture of the FtP find other jobs, often retraining in another career before their cases are even heard. Some go through repeated suspensions every 6/12 months. One poor nurse has repeated suspensions going back to 2012. Others that I know personally go back 4 - 6 years.
    Some RNs have a great sense of humour This is from D Lost to nursing & is nursing's loss
    Reading through the NMC's Competence and Conduct Committee information leaflet section on "Returning to practice after a striking-off order..134: You can reapply to the register after 5 years, 135: Restoration does not take place automatically, you will have to apply. 136: You will need to demonstrate that you are fit to return to practice. If you apply and repeatedly turned down, the panel may rule that you cannot re-apply. 137: If successful you will need to complete a return to practice course. Then, "Seeking Support" 138: Some people may find it difficult to settle back into their careers after referral. If you are having difficulties regaining your confidence at work you may wish to seek support from your professional organization (the RCN!) or trade union. YOU SHOULD CONSIDER DISCUSSING THE ISSUES WITH YOUR MANAGER. IF YOUR EMPLOYER OFFERS A CONFIDENTIAL COUNSELLING SERVICE, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER USING THIS SOURCE OF SUPPORT (just in case you have any ideas about putting the now ten-year old matter to bed).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.