Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Vetting scheme reviewed, but unjust barring stays

  • 3 Comments

A controversial safeguarding scheme has been partly halted by the government following fears it would lead to nurses being unjustly struck off.

The Home Office has postponed all new registrations with the Independent Safeguarding Authority while it carries out a review of the vetting and barring scheme.

The decision to review it came after Nursing Times revealed the Royal College of Nursing announced was launching a judicial review against the scheme.

While welcomed by the RCN, the move will not help nurses already facing being barred from practising with limited right to appeal.

The announcement to review it means plans to register new staff or those changing roles from next month onwards will be postponed.

A Home Office spokesman told Nursing Times the postponement would not prevent new staff working as employers would still be able to check their status with the Criminal Records Bureau.

While the review is underway, the ISA will continue to make decisions about whether nurses are fit to work with children and vulnerable adults and employers will still be obliged to refer any staff who may pose a risk.

The RCN plans to continue with its judicial review. Its chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter said nursing staff gave “paramount protection” to the protection of vulnerable patients but were concerned about the “potential unfairness” of the barring process.

He said: “As it stands there is an apparent duplication with other healthcare regulators and no adequate safeguards against ill-founded allegations, which could leave nursing staff disproportionately barred for 10 years for less serious disciplinary offences, and with no effective right of appeal.”

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • This needs to be sorted out as soon as possible.

    This is essentially a witch hunters charter, with an unseen and unnaccountable body passing down judgement on people without neccessarily understanding the full story.

    It is wrong. It needs to be scrapped.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • yep I agree - another hurdle when recruiting - plus more cost to practitioners to work - and we are being told we will have a pay freeze for 2 years!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does this show how powerful an influence the RCN can sway or is it just common sense on the part of the government. Either way I am now breathing a huge sigh of releif, on both the cost and fairness issues

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs