Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC registration necessary to call yourself a nurse


Only those registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council should be allowed to call themselves nurses according to draft recommendations from the Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery seen by Nursing Times.

Nursing Times understands the Commission will call on the NMC to take “urgent steps” to address public safety concerns and confusion over nurses’ roles.

For the first time, “nurse” would become a protected title, meaning that many of those working in areas such as private sector child or elderly care could no longer continue to call themselves ‘nurses’ if they did not possess NMC registration. This move could be accompanied by the standardisation of nurse job titles.

The commission also recommends advanced and specialist nurses are required to regularly provide evidence of their continuing “advanced” competencies to the NMC. That recommendation appears to hand a clear mandate to the NMC to introduce specific revalidation requirements for advanced nurses.

Additionally the commission says healthcare support workers should be regulated – a move seen as essential as NHS organisations employ more non-registered staff, particularly assistant practitioners at band 4.

However, the commission stops short of saying which regulator should do this – an omission that led to one source close to the commission to fear the question had been “kicked into the long grass”.

The report reiterates the rationale for turning nursing into a graduate-only entry profession by 2013.

Although commissioners have been wary of tacitly devaluing or undermining nurses without degrees, it recommends that a degree should be a requirement for any nurses taking on a clinical leadership or specialist practice role by 2020.

Nursing Times has been told that will include ward sisters and charge nurses, but commissioners have been keen to argue the recommendation merely reflects the current trajectory rather than a punitive “cap” on the career ladder of nurses without degrees.

The Commission’s full report – which is in final drafting stage – is expected to say that rather than being regarded as “subordinate” members of the healthcare team, nurses should assert their status as “interdependent equals” who are complementary, rather than subordinate, to doctors.

A DH spokesperson said: “The independent commission is still considering its report and recommendations on the role of nurses and midwives. It will shortly be publishing its final report.”


The Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery

Main recommendations

  • New pledge for all nurses and midwives stating their commitment and accountability for high quality and continuously improving care
  • Protection for the title “nurse”: only those registered by the NMC should be able to call themselves “nurses”
  • Regulation of specialist and advanced practice nurses by the NMC. Consideration should also be given to requiring the same of specialist midwives.
  • Support workers – including healthcare assistants and assistant practitioners - to be regulated
  • Degree a requirement for all clinical leadership and specialist roles by 2020
  • Boost to ward sister and charge nurse role and upward review of their pay and grades
  • Framework of national nursing indicators to be developed to measure nurse quality and its impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction
  • Nurses to act as “role models” for healthy living – their employers should help them do this
  • Career structures and training that allow nurses and midwives to move between different healthcare settings, such as hospitals, community services and social care
  • Scheme to identify, train and mentor future generation of nurse leaders, ripe for “fast track” into posts
  • High level group to review options for boosting capacity of nurses to understand and influence the design of new technology and informatics
  • Everyone woman to have a named midwife responsible for coordinating her care
  • Scheme and fellowship awards to encourage innovating in nursing services
  • Marketing campaign to “paint an appealing picture” of nurse careers and opportunities and to recruit the highest calibre, diverse candidates

Readers' comments (29)

  • With regard to all and sundry calling themselves nurses its about time this was put straight.Nearly all healthcare workers think and call themselves "Nurses" without any thought that members of the public think they are fully qualified .Of course many I have worked with especially in the community enjoy being someone they are not and openly call themselves "Nurses" to fraudulently be someone they are not.This is dangerous ground and an issue that should have been dealt with long ago. The nursing school I went too may not have been at degree level on qualifying but it was made clear then that to be a Nurse was to be on the register with a valid PIN. That was 25 years ago in Bridgend South Wales!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I qualified in 1972 and it was a clear requirement that to legally use the title Nurse, you had to be registered with the (as it was then), GNC.

    How many more times does the wheel need to be invented?

    Why can we not concentrate on teaching nurses to nurse in the true sense of the word?

    I truly dread old age and hospitalisation now, with the targets, short handedness and all of the other matters we read about on a daily basis.

    Not a good sitaution...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When are they going to stop dressing HCAs in a nurses uniform? To make it look like there are more nurses.

    Can you imagine stopping a HCA and telling him/her to stop using the term "nurse"? There would be war on.

    How can you regulate people without any structured, formal training? There are no standards to uphold. They are working under the nurse's supervision. They can't be called into question by a body. Who wants to bet their regulator will be the NMC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It would be unreasonable of the NMC to highjack a noun that existed long before they did. One might be a 'qualified nurse' without being a 'Registered Nurse'.

    Currently, you can't be Registered without being Qualified but that might change if 'UNqualified nurses' are also required to be Registered! (and define 'unqualified please).

    M Gough, RGN, BSc(Hons), LLM (Medical Law & Practice).

    Under statutory legislation, the title 'Registered Nurse' is already protected as are other 'titles' eg. Medical doctor (many people may actually have a 'real' PhD and be 'doctors' of something or other but they may not call themselves a 'medical doctor' Yet, to be a 'medical doctor' one need not have a PhD.

    See the case of Rv Richardson (1998) where an unregistered but qualified Dentist (also a protected title) was still able to treat patients legally without committing a 'crime' - though there might have been some issues of valid consent if the patient had taken a civil suit had something gone wrong.

    Basically, the NMC are wading about in a mine-field on this one. I will watch their progress with interest!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'll have to defer to Maria Gough as being more knowledgeable on the legislation, I thought that use of the title "Nurse" whether registered or not is covered by existing legislation, this is from one of my essays :

    The Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act 1997 Chapter 24 [London: HMSO, 1997] in section 13 False claim of professional qualification clearly states that “A person commits an offence if, with intent to deceive (whether by words or in writing or by the assumption of any name or description, or by the wearing of any uniform or badge or by any other kind of conduct) he falsely represents himself to possess qualifications in nursing, midwifery or health visiting”

    It seems like a technicality but maybe the loophole is that a person calling themselves a nurse without possessing qualifications in nursing could claim that they made clear that they did not possess nursing qualifications and this is what the Commission are seeking to put a stop to?

    As Anonymous 16-Feb-2010 10:09 am points out its a case yet again of re-inventing the wheel?

    As Anonymous 16-Feb-2010 12:05 pm alludes to in the eye of the public anyone in a hospital wearing something very similar or the same as a nurses uniform is a nurse!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a healthcare assistant I resent the implication that we go around pretending to be something that we are not.
    If any patient asks I will state that I am a healthcare assistant and explain what that is however I do not correct every patient who calls out nurse asking for a commode or for help finding their glasses as this would take time away from actually helping the patient. Also if they are asking for something outside my scope of practice I will tell them that I can not help them as I am not qualified but that I will find somebody who is.
    We wear different colour uniforms and so patients can see there is a difference however most do not mind who or what you are as long as you are kind and helpful and solve their problem. I even had a patient the other day saying to me ' I know you are not a nurse but I am going to keep calling you that anyway.'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What does the patient call the person caring for them? If they are wearing a uniform similar to that of the qualified staff, they will often call them 'Nurse'. This is regardless of whether the carer is HCA, care assistant, nursing auxiliary.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The title doctor is an academic qualification - real doctors have PHDs. The title that is given to those who hold a medical degree is an honory one.
    If a person engages in what to the public is nursing then don't be surprised if the public feel they are deserving of the honory title Nurse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 16-Feb-2010 5:48 pm you are correct. The 'medical doctor' is a Medical Practitioner, and many forget it is an honour for them to be called doctor,; the honour does not belong to the patient to call them doctor.
    Originally the terms "master" and "doctor" were synonymous, but over time the doctorate came to be regarded as a higher qualification than the master's degree.
    As has been stated previously, the title Nurse is already enshrined in law. I qualified RGN in Scotland in 1978 and it was made clear then that only those on the register were entitled to call themselves nurse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What do highly trained, experienced and qualified nurses call themselves if they are working outside direct patient care and unable to meet the NMC criteria to stay on the register. Many of us trained and qualified as State Registered nurses before the UKCC and NMC and worked extremely hard often at great personal and financial cost to qualify. Many of us, through no choice of our own, are unable to maintain registration. Does this mean we no longer have a profession and can no longer call ourselves nurses. Perhaps there should be a distinction between registered practicing clinical nurses and non-registered, non-clinical practicing nurses who are on a career break, undertaking family duties or working in other areas where all their acquired skills are still being utilised such as research, book authorship, nursing journalism, legal nursing, consulting, etc.

    This also gives rise to another question that if one has to leave the register for any reason and wishes to re-register a training course is required. This may require a clinical placement to undergo this course and the need to find an employer. However, if one requires registration for other posts such as self employment and one of the occupations listed above it seems of little practical value and probably not even possible to undertake such a course. One really does not need to spend time learning how to take blood pressures again and learning about a local NHS trust or other unrelated procedures offered on such a course when one is working towards a PhD for example.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.