Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nurses 'anxious' after legal challenge halts social enterprise transfer

  • 4 Comments

More than 1,000 nurses due to be transferred to a social enterprise face a further year of uncertainty after the process was halted following a high court challenge.

Although there is now a possibility staff currently employed by NHS Gloucestershire could remain within the NHS, under an agreement between the primary care trust and service user Michael Lloyd, 75, who launched the legal challenge, services could also be put out to competitive tender.

The transfer of staff and services from NHS Gloucestershire to Gloucester Care Services, a specially created social enterprise, has been on hold since Gloucestershire resident Mr Lloyd launched a legal challenge in September.

Lawyers for Mr Lloyd argued the PCT had acted unlawfully by approving the transfer of the community services to a social enterprise without giving other organisations an opportunity to bid for the services.

Mr Lloyd, supported by campaign group Stroud Against The Cuts, claimed this had removed the opportunity for the services to remain within the NHS.

The case, which Mr Lloyd received legal aid to fight, had been scheduled to last two days. However, before the PCT had made its case it was announced the two parties had reached an agreement to “settle” the case.

Under the terms of the agreement the PCT will now advertise for expressions of interest for the provision of NHS services in Gloucestershire before deciding whether to enter into “arrangements with another NHS body” or whether its preferred option is for the provision of services through a “different arrangement”. This could still include a social enterprise or a private sector organisation. 

Unison regional manager and former nurse Tanya Palmer told Nursing Times this had left staff “anxious” and facing at least another year of uncertainty.

“There is no guarantee under this approach that the services won’t be separated. Staff are anxious upset and worried, not only for themselves but for their patients and services.

“Staff clearly said they wanted to stay in the NHS but they were ignored [by NHS Gloucestershire management].”

The court heard that staff had been told staying in the NHS was not an option and that public consultation had been minimal.

Under the new agreement, the PCT has also committed to ensuring “appropriate” levels of staff and public engagement in future plans. Staff will continue to be employed by the PCT while this process is followed.

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • This sounds a very difficult situation for staff and illustrates the issues we are all facing in the present climate. Whilst I have no problem in maximising the efficiency of the NHS, looking at the organisation of pensions in the future, ensuring good patient care and improving the health of the nation, I am seriously worried by the current uncertainty created by the coalition government. Although we hear that David Cameron is not privatising the NHS and it will remain free at the point of usage, many of these schemes are a way of privatising the work force themselves. Unfortunately, in my opinion, too much is being proposed too soon without proper whole system thinking and so 'U' turns and uncertainty abounds. It is a great shame that so much opposition is around to the new health reforms but the health service workers are being accused of being difficult instead of actually being engaged in the process in a meaningful way. I don't mean a few 'experts' being consulted and sweeping decisions being made which is what seems to happen. The fact that the staff were consulted but Gloucestershire just went ahead is a prime illustration of 'tokenistic consultation'. Now Gloucestershire are stalling. It seems that even if a consultation ballot is sent out, plans are instigated even if there is opposition. If things were planned and implemented properly it might save money, time and resultant disillusionment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This shouldn't be happening. Social enterprise/private practice, it all equates to the same thing - destruction of the NHS! People are either for the NHS or against, there can be no middle ground.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • in our PCT - the staff had to vote for a Social Enterprise scheme to take us over, we said 'no' to this and it could not go ahead.

    We have now been TUPE'd over to an NHS Foundation Trust - we do not have to be asked about that option: but so far so good however, we are still in the 'honeymoon' period - watch this space.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At least you are still in the NHS! And according to the RCN trust status equals more job security for nurses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.