Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Public mental health: global perspectives

  • Comment

Title: Public mental health: global perspectives

Edited by: Lee Knifton and Neil Quinn

Publisher: McGraw Hill, Oxford University Press

Reviewer:  Stuart Sorensen, mental health nurse and trainer at Stuart also edits Care To Share Magazine

What was it like?

This book is “thorough”. From the impressive list of references to the attention to detail within the chapters it reads as though no stone has been left unturned in the pursuit of rational understanding of the topic. It’s as much a manifesto for change as anything else and while there is real value in that, indeed such books are vital to our society’s development, it felt “dry” to read. That’s not a criticism – just a fact. It’s a book largely written by academics and that’s exactly how it reads – like a book written by academics.

What were the highlights? 

However, dry though it can appear, the book is a real Alladin’s cave of wisdom, of innovation and thought provoking policy suggestions. Rusch and Corrigan’s short chapter on stigma, including “self stigma” described perfectly a problem, I’ve found difficult to quantify in the past while Mary O’Hagan’s chapter on Recovery and wellbeing was both informative and refreshing. The mini toolkits accompanying these and other chapters are helpful tools both for clarifying thinking and also, where applicable, providing action points for practice at personal, local and national/international (Macro, Meso, Micro) levels.

Strengths & weaknesses:

There is, of course value in expressing truth for its own sake but there were aspects of this book that had the cynic in me wondering what could be done to change the situation.  Kate Pickett and Richard Wilkinson are undoubtedly correct in linking mental illness and distress to inequality. Income inequality has been linked to high levels of mental distress and substance related problems since the original Black Report. But it’s difficult to see how governments can be persuaded to address the issue meaningfully given the political pressures they face to keep taxes low and electoral support high. In fairness the authors do offer a few suggestions of their own but my inner cynic remains unconvinced.

Who should read it?

Overall though, I liked this book. I found it informative and an extremely useful reference. It’s like a collection of short primers that I expect to return to many times in the future. I have no doubt that this would be a useful addition to any serious student’s library, not least because the relatively short chapters are so succinct in overviewing the topics they cover. Certainly my copy isn’t just going to sit on the shelf and gather dust. I might need to make sure I’ve got plenty of peace and quiet before I next open it though.

Public Mental Health

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.