Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'Care practitioner role would reverse nursing staff shortage'


The shortage of qualified nurses means we are facing an unprecedented crisis.

I recently transferred my nursing skills to work in the adult social care sector and have had to think hard about this shortage and what it means for everyone involved.

Christie & Co’s excellent report, published last month, nails the factors underlying the crisis: the UK has 15,000 too few nurses; numbers of training places are not increasing fast enough; many nurses are reaching retirement age; and the government is choking the supply of overseas nurses through ill-targeted immigration curbs. All these factors combine to make far more than the sum of their parts - it’s a perfect storm.

Nursing homes generally attract older nurses who want a better work/life balance. They are interested in nursing that is big on patient contact, and fed up with the relentless pressures of life in the NHS. We offer similar remuneration, ongoing training and career pathways that allow personal development; we want skilled, confident, self-reliant nurses. If they are interested in career progression it’s a bonus - there are many options available.

But it’s still tough to recruit. The shortage is even more problematic in adult social care than in the NHS. Nursing and residential care employs about 8% of the available nursing pool. We have about 9% full-time equivalent posts vacant - it’s 7% in the NHS. Many nurses simply don’t have a career in adult social care on their radar.

There is no prospect of the crisis resolving itself so this sector has had to think about alternatives. Barchester Healthcare has created a role of care practitioner. This is founded on significant extra training for senior care workers, with the expectation that they will take on basic nursing tasks, freeing up registered nurses’ time for higher-level work. Many of our care staff are eager to skill up to take on this role.

Senior politicians have cautiously voiced support, the Royal College of Nursing’s Peter Hodges advocates a comparable approach and there is a general acceptance among care professionals that this may be the best solution if it is well thought through and properly policed.

But here there is the flaw: the Care Quality Commission has not agreed to recognise that care practitioners are able to manage low-level nursing tasks. I feel some sympathy: it must appear to be a near-omnipotent judge, stern enough to keep the political establishment happy while empathising with problems in the health and care sectors.

I understand not wanting to risk a political “Blitz-bombing” if the new role doesn’t catch the popular imagination but it’s a well-managed, exciting approach. It’s also the best hope we have of riding out the recruitment storm - it may even turn the tide. The CQC must take the lead on the issue rather than wait it out and react.

The new role promises some enticing changes. Care practitioners could also work in health environments, helping to replace the much-missed state-enrolled nurse role. The role would open up new career pathways for care home staff and, in time, perhaps community care workers. It undermines agencies that are exploiting the situation and removes the need to employ agency workers who are lazy, incompetent or simply unfamiliar with their environments. By so doing, it would improve residents’ quality of life significantly. The role will give nurses in care environments more time to plan care and work towards outcomes. It would galvanise the sector.

Creating, sustaining and developing this role is not just riding out the recruitment storm - it is reinvigorating the health and care environment.

Trish Morris Thompson is director of quality and clinical governance at Barchester Healthcare


Readers' comments (5)

  • Which aspects of nursing care are "low level"? No wonder nursing isn't valued.

    The answer to the nursing shortage is to train more. Would you accept having the equivalent low level pilot flying your plane just because there were not enough of them?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear. Your frail, elderly patients with multiple pathologies need expert nursing. A 'make-do-and-mend' approach using unqualified staff and redefining nursing work to suit does no-one any favours. Least of all those elderly people.

    This really isn't the answer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this would work well and is a solution to the 'perfect storm' brewing as we type.

    Supervision of a registrant would be key - say 1 RN to 3 care practitioners?
    Working alone would suggest replacement of the RN.

    Well done for thinking of and starting a solution debate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is a dangerous path to go down. Nursing is already extremely under valued, and what kind of low level care are you referring to?

    The answer is simple, a more positive profile of nursing careers in the media, value the work nurses do, celebrate nurses, pay them a realistic salary and pay rises above the insulting 1% set by government and increase university places available.

    Do not create roles that the government will want to role out across the country in a cost saving frenzy....... a Nurse is a Nurse is a the saying goes, if you want our roles and responsibilities then go and train to join our profession and not allow organisations to create back door nursing roles.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Remember the good old days when we had SEN's who supported the SRN? That role should never have been removed, many SEN's went on to qualify as RN's but many were able and happy to stay in the role as SEN, they did not take over the role of the RN but supported them, they had a good clinical knowledge and background and could manage the auxiliary or care assistants. Bring them back and we can all provide a better service to those we are caring for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.