Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

EDITOR’S COMMENT

'Finance is being put before patient safety'

  • 3 Comments

Once again we find ourselves in a situation where patients are being put after the pound notes.

Reporter Shaun Lintern has this week learnt that 92% of trusts are unable to meet their own targets for the number of hours filled by registered nurses at their hospitals during the day. The story, on page 2 of this issue, indicates a deteriorating picture of staffing levels as the NHS approaches winter.

This is a classic case of reaping what you sow. The last government cut nursing posts at the beginning of its term in office. So we failed to train enough nurses and suddenly we have a nursing shortage that is so dire, trusts are scrambling to recruit nurses from overseas to meet their nurse staffing targets.

It is little wonder then that nursing directors were so concerned earlier this year when migration controls were looking likely to prevent overseas recruitment, and agency caps were introduced to reduce the reliance on agency staff.

I sometimes feel that being a director of nursing must feel like a game of musical chairs. Every time a chief nurse thinks they can just about cope, the government seems to take away another chair. Not enough homegrown nurses? Go abroad. Oh wait, you can’t. Get out your chequebook for the agency staff – er, no that’s off limits too.

Thankfully good sense prevailed over the migration controls, mainly due to smart lobbying by the Royal College of Nursing. But the scrutiny over agency usage will leave many trusts making a choice between breaking the “rules” and safely staffing their wards. No director of nursing wants to rely so heavily on agencies, but their options are running out. Strike that, they’ve run out.

In the acute sector, we have all the ingredients for another winter of discontent – hospitals bulging with the weight of admissions, ambulances queuing up outside A&Es and patients lining the corridors while nurses are rushed off their feet trying to care for them. Things aren’t any better in other care settings – no nurses means poorer care everywhere.

We seem to have learnt nothing from Francis’s report into the care failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust, and once again finance is being put before the safety of patients. And I am left wondering – if Mid Staffs didn’t shake the government into understanding the value of nursing, then what ever will?

 

Jenni Middleton, editor

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • michael stone

    I have only read the headline.

    The problem, which I think is fairly obvious, is that we all know that 'finance is sometimes put ahead of patient-safety, and certainly that restricted finance restricts achievable outcomes': but, you will almost never find the person who is cutting the resources (often a politician) CLEARLY ADMITTING that 'this will reduce patient safety'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How come the language testing of foreign-sourced nurses never mentioned as a contributory factor in the imminent train-wreck? Now extended to include EU nurses, it is substantially reducing the candidate pool from which trusts can select its nurses. The ability to achieve the required grade in the IELTS test is now more important (on the basis of rarity) than their actual nursing qualification. Forget about "values-based recruitment" - trusts will have to take "any nurse who can pass the English exam" rather than being able to select based on values, commitment, experience, etc.

    Nobody ever suggested that nurses shouldn't be tested on their ability to communicate in English but there were many objectors to the IELTS test and, in particular, to the absurdly high score required - all of which were arrogantly ignored by the NMC, so determined were they to force this new ruling into place.

    Add in the agency price-capping, the pay freeze, the new threat of bursary changes plus the determination of NHS management to ignore plummeting morale levels and you have a "perfect storm" brewing. RIP Nursing in the NHS!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Michael stone
    Down vote

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.