Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'Legislative change alone is not a panacea to the critical shortage of donor organs'

Greg Bleakley
  • 1 Comment

England has initiated public consultation to change legislation to an opt-out system for organ donation.

Notionally, this appears a reasonable proposal to increase the number of deceased donor organs for use in transplant operations. However, the move towards an opt-out system for organ donation fails to address profound ethical, moral and professional concerns among some nurses.

“The perception that legislative change alone can ‘fix’ the critical shortage of donated organs is contentious”

While any political decision or discourse which leads to more lives being saved should be encouraged, the perception that legislative change alone can ‘fix’ the critical shortage of donated organs is contentious. Moreover, there is no solid evidence from anywhere in the world that legislative changes dramatically increases donor numbers.

The current system in England observes a soft opt-In system for organ donation. This model relies on individuals to sign up to the Organ Donor Register (ODR) or carry an organ donor card.

Furthermore, the Human Tissue Act 2004 interprets lawful consent to organ donation as a person verbalising organ donation wishes to relatives during life. Critically, the current legal framework allows lawful consent from relatives in situations when wishes are not known.

First, most deceased donor organs originate from patients in critical care areas that lack capacity. Typically, a potential organ donor is a patient who has experienced a neurological insult leading to brain stem ischaemia.

In an attempt to protect the airway, clinicians insert an endo-tracheal tube into the trachea and add sedatory drugs to promote compliance with mechanical ventilation. This generates a situation whereby the patient lacks capacity to consent due to their unconscious state. 

Indeed, some commentators argue that the autonomy of the person has been relinquished, which produces a complex situation as the patient is unable to express personal need, desire or belief.

This stimulates a myriad of emotional and moral dilemmas for nurses. That is to argue if 65% of the population are not on the ODR then the opt-out debate and ‘presumptive’ consent for organ donation is difficult.

Second, the public can elect to opt-out of the proposed organ donation system on inaccurate or limited information. High-profile media cases have proven to disrupt public confidence in organ donation and transplantation.

For example, in 2015 The Telegraph reported that the NHS had endorsed plans to use ‘high-risk’ donor organs. Without contextualising the concept of ‘high-risk’, such articles damage public confidence about the safety of organ transplantation.

“Practitioners need to apply a note of caution”

Finally, practitioners need to apply a note of caution as legislative change alone is not a panacea to the critical shortage of donor organs. Possibly some are attracted to donate organs to help others as ‘altruistic gifting’ and perhaps the obligation attached to an opt-out system is uncomfortable for some.

Wales has moved to an opt-out system for organ donation. However, the Welsh opt-out law changes in 2015 failed to dramatically increase the number of organ donors. Hawes (2017) notes that even with an opt-out system for organ donation ”the agreement of next of kin must still be sought, a condition missed by many.

Dr Greg Bleakley RN is lecturer in adult nursing, University of Manchester

References

Hawes N (2017) Welsh opt-out law fails to increase organ donations. British Medical Journal; 359: j5659 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5659.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Absolutely correct Greg changing the law may help but fundamentally we need to address the continued misunderstanding of a large number of the general public.
    We know that organ donation can help a lot of people with their grief in that other people have benefited from the loss of their loved one, however I believe we should have a sustained campaign throughout the year that highlights donor families. I find it disappointing that the public supported broadcasting corporations cannot feature documentaries telling the donor families stories this would have a massive impact
    All of us who have been involved in organ donation know the powerful impact these individuals have when they present at our conferences and educational days, one would presume from this that the same effect would be had in a TV documentary.
    Let’s hope that the on going rise in the number of organ donors can be sustained to allow us to finally irradiate the statistic of 3 deaths per day on the transplant waiting list.
    Regards
    Jayne Fisher

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs