Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'Is a call for ex-nurses to return to practice too little, too late?'


The UK is once again facing an acute shortage of qualified nurses, at a time when the public is being promised higher standards and safer patient care.

The staffing crisis comes three years after the old strategic health authorities cut nurse training places across England. Unsurprisingly, the greatly reduced nursing class of 2011 graduated this summer to open arms across the NHS.

There is now overwhelming evidence to suggest that if the number of nurses does not increase within the next two or three years, we can expect a significant impact on standards of patient care. What is missing is any meaningful public debate about the cost of safe, high-quality patient care, and whether the country is prepared to pay it.

Financial restrictions on trusts, under the governance of the NHS Trust Development Authority, makes affordability the most significant indicator in workforce plans, rather than need.

To make the books balance while meeting essential staffing levels, trusts are forced to siphon resources from other areas of care to fund costly overseas recruitment or expensive agency staff.

A national call to encourage “ex-nurses” to return to practice is now under way. The University of Worcester and other universities engaged in nurse training will support this initiative by running intensive update programmes to prepare returning nurses. But is this too little, too late to prevent a care crisis? We do not know how many people will seek to regain their registration or whether they will be in a position to take on the training and the working practices of the NHS.

In the wake of the 2013 Francis report into failings in care at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust, the public were assured that such problems across the health service would be rectified, and a review of staffing levels and a better ratio of nurses to patients was recommended. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has now endorsed the Safer Nursing Care Tool as an acuity-based toolkit to be used alongside the NICE guidelines on safe staffing. The presumption is that fewer than one nurse to eight patients should trigger a possible “red flag cause for concern”.

While this is a step in the right direction, the guidance is not yet mandatory and does not identify where the “extra” nurses to meet the safer staffing levels would come from.

It takes three years and 2,300 hours of patient care to qualify as a nurse, and the government controls the number of training places that universities can offer each year. It is too late to rectify the training place cuts of 2011, 2012 and 2013, but there needs to be an urgent rethink for this year. The 17% cut in training places locally needs to be reversed immediately, at the very least.

There is no shortage of well-qualified applicants - at Worcester we are turning away students with high academic grades who have proved during the interview process that they have the compassion to make excellent nurses.

Since the Francis report was published, the health service has been making huge strides to improve care standards and there are many examples of great practice. But if we do not address the acute crisis in nursing, progress will not be sustained. Too few nurses are being asked to do too much. Without a clear and effective strategy for recruitment and retention, I fear we could be faced with another crisis of care.

Jan Quallington is head of the Institute of Health and Society at the University of Worcester and a member of the steering group for the Centre for Ethical Leadership


Readers' comments (4)

  • Stop reporting nurses to the NMC for spurious dishonest reasons, just because the expressed disquiet about the unethical treatment of patients in their wards units or communities. Then you will have enough senior "hands on" highly skilled nurses. But Management have themselves to blame for the lack of well qualified nurses its they who did their best to get rid of them - for wholly selfish reasons.. If you have never looked at the NMC hearing lists, do so. I have seen so many nurses unfairly picked on for such petty things, sometimes perfectly justified things too - and publicly humiliated by the NMC who pick up the bullying from hospital management, there.

    Quite frankly the current Nursing management only have themselves to blame for the nursing shortage.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with the above, serious offences yes, petty things need to be dealt witjh at at lower level, not long before no one will be not facing a hearing as no one is perfect, be careful don't have a life, get seen out for one quiet glass f wine on your holiday- up before the nmc for , also they can charge for anything they want, oops I bought a mars bar yesterday, bound to be strucdk of for that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • too late gone abroad for a better career and way of life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Think about how one may have left 'Practice'. A bigger stick and a shorter leash is not an incentive to return.
    Nursing is very rewarding. Being a Nurse is not.
    I would encourage everyone to give it a go as a career at some point. You can learn a lot about others and yourself. If you love it, brilliant.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.