Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'Nursing research must be seen as a priority'


Last week the National Nursing Research Unit celebrated its 35th birthday at a wonderful event at King’s College in London. Over those 35 years, the NNRU has demonstrated just how vital it is for nurses to have an evidence base.

Several nurses - including Sally Brearley from the Nursing Care and Quality Forum and Howard Catton from the Royal College of Nursing - spoke about the importance of this organisation to the profession. And I echo their sentiments.

The unit has been able to remove the emotion from theories about the work nurses do, and really prove what the effects will be of, say, longer shift patterns or staff to patient ratios.

It has diligently gathered data to ensure what people felt would work really will have a positive effect on outcomes. And it has stuck to the statistics to prove how care quality indicators could be enhanced or undermined by certain changes to practice or staffing.

Yet despite undeniably proving its worth during the last three and a half decades, the NNRU has learnt that its government funding is not to be renewed. Instead, if this important work is to be continued, it must seek funding from elsewhere. Those working at the NNRU are confident that this can be achieved, although we must acknowledge it will not be easy. But the NNRU team recognises the value of their work to all those in nursing - and to patients and employers - and are determined to see it continue.

It is understandable that the government is looking to make some savings considering its financial pressures. But to cease to support nurse research seems shortsighted at best. The work of the unit has helped to drive policy around staffing levels, identify best practice as well as support research. It has provided evidence to enable the profession to campaign and lobby for change that will put patients first. Without this work, it would become harder to understand how patient outcomes are affected by issues such as single occupancy rooms, intentional rounding and skill mix.

At a time when reforms and cost-cutting measures are leaning heavily on resources, now, more than ever, nurse leaders need data to show evidence of how any changes will affect their capacity to care for patients. And the Department of Health would do well to remember that this isn’t just information used by nurses to lobby and campaign, but to actually ensure patient safety. With the Mid Staffs report looming on the horizon, what nursing needs is data to support its case for service transformation. This isn’t a “nice to have”. It is a “need to have”. Follow me on Twitter @nursingtimesed


Chat live with the editor and other nurses on Twitter every Wednesday at 1pm at #NTtwitchat


Readers' comments (2)

  • tinkerbell

    this unelected government have shown they don't want researched 'facts' in nursing, they just want 'spin' and propaganda. I'm sure they would or maybe already are funding a research centre somewhere into 'spin' or in other words how to tell a damn good lie, get away with it, win peoples confidence and then give them a good kicking once you have their trust. Wouldn't put it passed them. Why fund evidence when you can just tell downright lies and do what you like anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 20-Sep-2012 7:53 pm

    Watch the blood pressure, Tink - we are both high-risk ! Nice point, though - even if we already knew that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.