Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Parties clash over health issues

  • 1 Comment

The three main political parties all accused each other of “failing the NHS” before last night’s televised debate between the Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat leaders.

Although the evening debate did not discuss health policies, a debate during the day between health secretary Andy Burnham, shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley and Lib Dem health spokesman Norman Lamb covered hospital cuts, job losses, funding and social care.

Mr Burnham had claimed that the “difficult decisions” of closing hospital units saved lives and improved patient care.

The Government has stoked anger with its policy of creating “centres of excellence” which close hospital departments and focus on one facet of healthcare such as stroke treatment.

The Government claims the centres are more efficient and provide “targeted care” to patients, despite some local services being lost in the process.

But Mr Lansley said the “difficult decisions” that were made, which saw maternity units being shut, were not in patients’ best interests and had no support among doctors. He added that he is “not saying there should be a moratorium on change in the NHS” but that planned cuts which fly in the face of clinical evidence should not be made.

And despite a rise in demand, some health services have been shut down, Mr Lansley said.

Mr Lamb said that local bodies - ones which are “democratically accountable to local people” - should be given the power to decide which services are to be cut because such decisions should not come from central government.

Mr Burnham claimed doctors have backed the Government’s cuts and said the Mr Lansley was attempting to straddle “two horses” and was only “saying what people want to hear”.

The Health Secretary said: “The NHS will have to make these kind of decisions in this next decade but I’m afraid both of you are trying to have it both ways.”

Mr Lamb, who mentioned the issue of party funding in the debate, pointed out that Mr Lansley’s “private office is being funded by the wife of the chief executive of a major private health company” (Care UK), which is a “conflict of interest”.

The Government’s NHS contract with Care UK saw the firm make millions of pounds out of healthcare, he added.

Mr Lansley replied: “An individual person provided money to Conservative central office; that happens. Nick Clegg has been supported by individuals who support his office. That’s not a problem, that’s how it works.”

Mr Lamb added later in the debate: “We have had offers of support to my office but I have not taken them because I think it’s potentially distorting the judgements that we make.”

  • 1 Comment

Related videos

Readers' comments (1)

  • What an absolute load of crap these people spew. Anything they say is simple electioneering.

    Here is what is needed.

    Get government and private organisations OUT of the NHS!

    Scrap the beauracracy, get rid of 95% of the trust directors, executives, middle managers, coordinators, idiots with clipboards and no medical training, etc etc etc.

    Make sure 95% of the money gets to infrastructure, Doctors and Nurses, and patient care.

    Although it will be expensive, giving Nurses a fair pay rise and increasing the number of Nurses on the wards with a legal Nurse/patient ratio is ESSENTIAL. (note, scrapping a lot of trust directors will pay for a lot of this!) THIS will ensure a lot of the quality of patient care that all three parties went on about for quite some time.

    The expansion of primary care services as advised in the Darzi report is an excellent idea, but NOT at the cost of hospitals. Hospitals MUST be kept open and beds MUST be increased, not scrapped. Furthermore, PFI must NEVER be used, it is just throwing billions of pounds away to private firms over the next decade just to save a few quid now. It is ridiculous.

    I could go on all night, but I'm tired now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.