Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Patient-clinician involvement makes UI research more clinically useful

  • Comment

Staff involved in front-line urinary incontinence care should be able to influence research agendas, say experts.

Research from the James Lind Alliance showed that when research in this area is prioritised in collaboration with those affected, it produces more clinically useful results.

From 2007 until 2009, eight patient and 13 clinician organisations were asked to identify gaps in current evidence.

The researchers found that current evidence does not tend to cover the issues that most affect those working in the field.

Professionals are sometimes required to make decisions about clinical care without the evidence base to support the decision.

The researchers said that they were able to produce more relevant research agendas and subsequent results by highlighting the needs of those working with urinary incontinent patients, as well as the patients themselves.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.