Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


Paul Snelling: 'Rounding is an evidence-free idea driven by political whim'


Maintaining the public gaze on superficial initiatives, such as rounding, diverts it from where proper scrutiny should be, says Paul Snelling

No nurse can deny these are difficult times for the profession, and that a robust response is required to restore public confidence.

The government’s response to the Francis report, announced last week, reiterated that all hospitals would be urged to introduce nurse rounding, the practice where all patients are checked hourly according to a standard protocol.

Impressive claims for the effectiveness of rounding have been made and it has been heavily promoted by the prime minister and the Nursing and Care Quality Forum. Robert Francis QC also stated that change would not be achieved by top-down pronouncements, and yet the “urging” of rounding appears to be an example of this. But it was also recommended that professional bodies (note: not the government) work on devising evidence-based standard procedures; perhaps the implementation of rounding can be justified here, supported by robust evidence?

The problem is there is very little evidence for intentional rounding. What evidence there is consists almost exclusively of poor-quality studies from the US, undertaken by hospitals and management consultancies with a financial interest in promoting it to reduce call bell use and increase patient satisfaction. Much healthcare in the US is based on profit and competition between providers that spend nearly three times per person as in the UK. Hospitals in the most influential US study on rounding had over eight hours per person of direct nursing care per day (I’ll leave you to do the sums for your ward). Surely, there must be some good-quality evidence that can be transferred to the UK? I have looked very hard and found none, and no systematic review is available.

“Rounding represents the politicised search for simple solutions to complex problems”

I do not want to be misunderstood. Like every nurse, I am in favour of any intervention that is shown to improve care, part of which is patient satisfaction. I say “part” because, as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recognises, patient satisfaction is widely acknowledged to be a poor indicator of care quality. This hasn’t stopped the implementation of the Friends and Family Test, described as “unsuitable for use in NHS settings” in a study for the Care Quality Commission. As they distribute questionnaires, few nurses will know that the test was designed, again in the US, to help business growth, and that it is ineffective even at that. But, as with undertaking rounding, nurses will administer the test because the government says they must.

Rounding may work, so why I am I so sceptical? First, it is the opposite of individualised care that forms the foundation of good, professional nursing. Second, it has been implemented following evidential claims that are always flimsy and sometimes simply false. Third - most importantly - it represents the politicised search for simple solutions to complex problems. Maintaining the public gaze on superficial initiatives diverts it from where proper scrutiny should be - on resources and political micromanagement.

It is not known whether intentional rounding will improve care, but it is known that, unsurprisingly, higher numbers of better educated nurses will.

I’m heartened by the acknowledgement in Compassion in Practice that evidence-based staffing levels are needed. Let’s hope for progress there but, in the meantime, we do ourselves and our patients no good at all by meekly allowing politically driven and evidence-free interventions to dominate the post-Francis nursing environment.

Paul Snelling is senior lecturer in adult nursing and programme leader, MSc specialist practice, at UWE Gloucester


Readers' comments (17)

  • Surely it is concerned with what is 'interpreted' by the Nurse from each and every patient during so called 'rounding'.
    If a patient is OK at 12 midday but not at 1pm then may be an indication at 12 midday was missed that was relevant to deterioration. Just whizzing round the bays to check people is not enough.
    Patients may want to say if they feel unwell
    but don't always declare it for many reasons
    If nurses don't learn to read the signs and simply use 'rounding' as a ritual then it is a waste of time .
    Ward sisters & senior staff nurse should use these patient checks to support and teach junior staff as well as reassuring the patient and relatives that an experienced
    member of staff is on the team and looking out for them and their staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If a patient becomes unwell and you spend a lot of time with them what will happen to the other 28 who miss out on their intentional rounding tick-box exercise?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "No nurse can deny these are difficult times for the profession, and that a robust response is required to restore public confidence". This is very true, but no matter what nurses do, public opinion will still be led by ill informed and sensationalist reportage in the media, and soundbite politics, neither of which give a meaningful flying fig about real patient's outcomes. My suggestion to nurses? Stop buying the papers and watching the news on TV, and concentrate on what they are best at - treating patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My suggestion to nurses. Get out on strike.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree David; papers like the DM love to portray us in a bad light, and it can get you down.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nurses are feeling very demoralised, I am tired of being put down all the time by people who don't have a clue. I really wish politicians and journalists who claim to be 'health experts' would come and spend a few weeks on the wards.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I remember the time when there was toileting time on the wards. The matron would supervise this. All patient from one end of the ward got to sit on a commode or taken to the toilet whether they wanted or not. Are we going backwards?
    This rounding is bad bad news for common sense and intelligence.
    Why are we sending student nurses to university we might as well sit at the feet of politians to teach us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs