Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Peter Carter: 'Trust boards must be obliged to publish their actual staffing levels'

  • 10 Comments

In order to ensure safe care in the NHS, we need to lift the veil of secrecy, says Peter Carter

Last week, the well-respected Sir Bruce Keogh published his review into 14 trusts in England with higher than expected rates of patient mortality. The review attracted nationwide media attention, with 11 of the 14 trusts being put into “special measures” in an attempt to turn things around.

The review is a seminal piece of work, one that should be examined by anyone who is responsible for how we deliver patient care. Sir Bruce sets out what he calls his “ambitions”, which are the recommendations for change that he wants to see “significant progress” on within two years. There are eight in total, ranging from the use of early warning systems to involving patients and families in reviewing and evaluating patient care.

“We need staffing levels that are both flexible enough to reflect what patients require, while at the same time providing a minimum number, which sets in stone what safe staffing looks like”

Two of Sir Bruce’s ambitions struck a real chord with me and I suspect the same will be true of many readers of Nursing Times. Ambition six demands that “nurse staffing levels and skill mix will appropriately reflect the caseload and the severity of illness of the patients they are caring for and be transparently reported by trust boards”.

Sir Bruce rightly identifies that not all patient requirements are the same, and similarly neither are their medical conditions. We need staffing levels that are both flexible enough to reflect what patients require, while at the same time providing a minimum number, which sets in stone what safe staffing looks like.

We must also, as Sir Bruce points out, be completely transparent about nurse staffing levels. Trust boards must be obliged to publish what staffing levels in their services should be, and what they actually are. Patients and their families are then entitled to examine any deficits and ask what has gone awry. One reason why the NHS is suffering from unsafe staffing levels is because trust bosses have been allowed to get away with freezing vacancies and cutting posts. In order to ensure safe care, we need to lift this veil of secrecy.

Secondly, in ambition eight, Sir Bruce demands that “all NHS organisations will understand the positive impact that happy and engaged staff have on patient outcomes, including mortality rates, and will be making this a key part of their quality improvement strategy”. There are few who can deny that happy, empowered and appropriately rewarded staff deliver better care to patients.

The same is true in any environment, not just in health; if you care for the people who deliver the service then everything else starts to fall into place. However, the NHS, and indeed those in government, have a questionable record on looking after the staff who deliver patient care. Nursing staff are being stretched in all directions. They are understaffed, overworked and, with a 1% pay cap until 2015, they are underpaid.

At congress this year, I was struck by just how bruised our members felt at the repeated attacks on their integrity and compassion. We also know that when staff are empowered to lead (and perhaps even change) the services they provide, the quality of care improves. Nurses should be at the heart of constantly challenging the status quo and suggesting new and innovative ways of delivering care to patients. The NHS needs to get better at recognising the vast talents of the staff who work for it, and we must do more to allow nurses to shape change and influence the way things are done.

Sir Bruce has delivered a superb review, one that rightly identifies the journey that the NHS needs to take now. The time has come for those at the top to start the engine and get things moving.

Peter Carter is chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing

  • 10 Comments

Readers' comments (10)

  • michael stone

    I think we've recently established on this 'site, that 'they often fiddle the figures' !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'Trust boards must be obliged to publish their actual staffing levels'

    Or what, Mr Carter? Or what?! Are you going to rally your membership around a unified call for action? Demand decent skill mixes and staff patient ratios?

    Nah. Thought not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think I must have banged my head and woken up in Victorian times given my current working pattern, I am paid for seven and a half hour days but instead work ten hour plus shifts with no breaks and yesterday on the hottest day of the year I realized that I had only had half a cup of tea all day. No wonder I had a headache. I actually wouldn't mindif it was just that it was a frantic spell as happens in nursing but it's because the powers that be in their wisdom decided to ignore the vacancy in my team that they knew about on January even though that leaves us over a third down in hours. Great during the summer when bank staff are at a premium and now we are expected to make extra visits to check how the vulnerable are coping in the heat wave. NHS managers respond only to targets I truly hope they will be measured on staffing numbers because nothing else makes them listen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS Managers do not need to respond to staffing levels, because too many nurses are working for free and completely fail to realise that they are adding to the problem.

    Take your breaks, go home on time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Anonymous | 23-Jul-2013 6:28 pm

    Exactly. Pter, now go and make them a nice 'shut the f*ck up cup of tea'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Carter: shut up!

    You and your poxy organisation with its Stepford-esque 'union' reps sat back and allowed the scandal of Mid-Staffs to happen. You and your gang did nothing, absolutely nothing, to help staff when they approached the RCN with their grave concerns as to the death and suffering going on in the wards and departments; indeed, it is my understanding that the RCN attempted to deny any awareness at all choosing instead to collude with management to help it all 'go away'.

    Your fake enthusiasm for Keogh's ambition eight makes me physically sick. How the leader of the a 'union' who has rubber-stamped government plans to reduce nurses pay and conditions dares speak of nurses being happy and engaged at work is beyond me.

    If you had any decency at all you would have resigned your position a long time ago.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What interesting comments and very telling of current NHS culture., Your staff seem to feel unsupported Mr Carter....what do you plan to do about it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I had an acquaintance who worked there once among the blue hair rinse, pearls, tweeds brogues, liberty bodice, lisle stockings and twinset and afternoon tea and bickies brigade. she said it was quite ghastly and their gossip and bullying was horrendous!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is not this guy part of the problem? Groups like the RCN are self serving & have little interest in the taxpaying patients

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 30-Jul-2013 10:23 am

    Absolutely spot on!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.