Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Plan for premature babies under threat as 2,700 nurse posts remain vacant

  • 2 Comments

Efforts to improve standards of care for premature and sick babies have been thrown into doubt amid concern over funding and a gap in the nursing, it has emerged.

Ministers have refused to allocate the cash needed to plug a shortfall of 2,700 nurses and 300 other specialist staff, such as physiotherapists and dieticians, on England’s neonatal wards.

A Neonatal Taskforce was established last year by the Department of Health in response to the National Audit Office’s criticism of standards of care for sick babies.

Its new guidance, published on Wednesday, recommends gravely ill babies get one-on-one nursing to give them the best chance of survival in the first 28 days of life.

But experts fear that without extra resources to help neonatal units take on more staff the changes will not be implemented.

A spokesman for the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health said: “We urge the government to ensure that the resources and funding needed to implement the recommendations and standards are made available.

“Babies should not be denied access to one-to-one nursing care and other support which is already available to children and adults in intensive care.”

Health Minister Anne Keen said: “To ensure this toolkit makes a real difference to neonatal care I have also asked to have ministerial oversight of its implementation.”

Nearly 70,000 babies a year are treated in neonatal units, with around a third admitted to intensive care. Last year, 2,127 babies born in England died before they reached a month old.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • 1 to 1?

    EEEEh stoppit, I'll wet meself!
    This means tax rises to fund it and some political will from management. 'Twill never happen....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is nothing new. I have worked in an Neonatal Unit since 1986 and there was a shortage of nurses then. One to one nursing for the critical baby would be an ideal situation for all, however where I currently work, one nurse is allocated a seriously ill baby and the rest of the staff manage the remaining babies. 2700 jobs would staff probably around 20 new neonatal units in the UK, I doubt this will ever happen until nurses are treated better within their trust and rewarded for the skills they have gained, once this is done and it is seen to be done, then maybe more people will come into neonatal nursing, however to get an skilled neonatal nurse is going to take 3 - 5 years, so this shortfall will be with us for some years yet.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.