Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Political parties warned over 'slash and burn' approach to NHS funding

  • Comment

The British Medical Association has launched its general election “manifesto”, which says political parties must not adopt a “slash and burn” approach to NHS finances and services.

The body said the NHS provided better value for money than any comparable healthcare system in the world and ministers should continue to invest in it at a time when demand for services was increasing.

BMA chair Dr Hamish Meldrum said: “Tough questions are being asked about public services.

“But even during a time of financial stringency, continued investment in the NHS is vital.

“A slash and burn response to the need for savings would be dangerous and short sighted, risking long term damage to the infrastructure of the health service.

“Now more than ever we should acknowledge the success of the NHS and recognise the support it gives people when times are hard.

“It would be a disastrous error to resort to measures such as cutting clinical staff at a time when demand for healthcare is increasing.”

The document, Standing up for Doctors - Standing up for Health, says money can be saved by cutting the use of private companies and expensive management consultants.

This includes reducing reliance on independent sector treatment centres and private finance initiatives.

The BMA wants to see the NHS restored to a “publicly provided service”.

Dr Meldrum said: “When the drivers are profits, it has to be asked whether patients’ interests are really being served, and value for money being achieved.

“Creating a market means high transactional costs and bureaucracy, with money that could be spent on patient care going to private companies and shareholders.”

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.